VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 28th Mar 2003 09:34 #1
    racer-x
    racer-x is offline
    Member racer-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Search Comp PM
    I do a lot of home video editing and then burn to DVD. I mainly use Premeire and Ulead to capture via 1394. Premiere captures AVI type2, while Ulead captures AVI typ1. I know Type2 has video and audio on seperate tracks, while type1 has them joined. I also know type2 is slightly larger in size (18min. = 4 GIGs) vs. (20mins. = 4 GIGs) for type1. Premeire and Ulead will work and convert to either format, but will only capture to one. I have read the Quality is the same. What I want to know is, Why does Premeire use Type2 and othe video editers use type1? Does one have any advantage over the other? I don't care about file size, just quality.
    Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........
    Quote Quote  
  2. 28th Mar 2003 11:52 #2
    kabanero
    kabanero is offline
    Member kabanero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    HockeyTown
    Search Comp PM
    Hi racer-x,

    Here is the info from Ulead web site, and here is the info from Microsoft web site.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 28th Mar 2003 18:48 #3
    racer-x
    racer-x is offline
    Member racer-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Search Comp PM
    Hey thanks kabanero, that was very useful!
    Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!