VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Search Comp PM
    ATI All-in-Wonder MMC @ 8k Bits/Sec is giving me better quality than a three pass CCE VBP 8k bits/sec. Being a frequent reader of this board, this baffles me... It should be the opposite.

    I just bought my DVD writer and I want to convert all of my Hi-8 recordings to DVD. I first did the following tests:

    ATI All-in-wonder MMC 7.7 Settings:

    MPEG Format
    720x480
    Motion Estimation: 0%
    Sound - mono 48k - 16bit
    Inverse Telecine not checked.

    I did repeated captures using bitrates of 3k, 4k, 6k, and 8k VPR with deinterlaced checked.
    I then repeated the process with deinterlaced unchecked.

    This gave me 8 mpg files with various settings. Now I wanted to compare MMCs quality to CCE.

    Virtual Dub Settings:

    Huffy (used recommeded settings)
    Sound - mono 48k - 16bit
    720x480
    Used no filters

    I then captured the same 2 min 30 second section as before with 0 dropped frames.

    Next, I encoded with CCE using various methods:

    I changed the following defaults:

    Checked box for DVD compliant.
    GOP sequence changed N/m from 5 to 4.

    Using the AVI file from virtualdub, I encoded 5 different rates with CCE

    3k bitrate CBR
    4k bitrate VBR (3k low, 8k high) 3 passes
    6k bitrate VBR (3k low, 8k high) 3 passes
    8k bitrate VBR (3k low, 9.8k high) 3 passes
    8k bitrate CBR

    For each VBR encode I deleted the old .VAF from the previous encode. I wasn't sure if they were unique to the bitrate set. (guess I can do a file comparison to find that out).

    ------------------------------

    Now I have 13 different files, I loaded them into Ulead Workshop and authored a DVD with each file being a new chapter and a description of what it was. Workshop skipped it's own encoding process since they were already DVD compliant. I next burnt the 1.5 gig DVD.

    Viewing and judging the DVD on a 36 inch TV with others, this is our results.

    3K bitrate:
    CCE: interlaced CBR - Low quality but best of the 3k bitrates
    MMC: deinterlaced - low quality. blocky in several places
    MMC: interlaced - Unacceptable. VERY bad blocks. Worst

    4k bitrate:
    MMC: deinterlaced - still low quality - minor blocks here and there, but best of the 4k bitrates
    MMC: interlaced - Same as above, but slight less quality
    CCE: interlaced VBR - hardly any blocks, but motion is jerky compared to fluidness of motion in MMC

    6k bitrate:
    MMC: deinterlaced - high quality. Blocks not visible unless I pause and examine video. Fluid motion [Best of the 6k bitrate]
    MMC: interlaced - Same as above, but a tad bit less quality. Also fluid motion
    CCE: interlaced VBR - Beautiful video, but movement of objects is jerky (flickers like, makes me dizzy)

    8k bitrate:
    MMC: deinterlaced - high quality. hardly distinguishable from 6k bitrate. [Best of all 13 segments]
    MMC: interlaced - Again, tad bit less quality than deinterlaced version
    CCE: interlaced CBR - Still has that damn jerkyness
    CCE: interlaced VBR - Motion jerkyness. Not much different than one above.

    So the 8k MMC deinterlaced was the best. Double shock! I figured viewing it on a TV that interlaced would look better. Guess I was wrong. Their was a point on the MMC interlaced that when I paused the video, I could see the comb interlace lines.

    So anybody have an ideas what I am doing wrong? Any ideas on improving quality. I heard of inverse telecine improving quality. But then I would have to do a pulldown on the avi (to get framerate back to 29.970), and the one time I tried that a while back I got audio sync problems. Anyone have a good link for a guide with virtualdub and IVTC
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!