If retailed DVD's ( in their original packaging, made by the companies) were as cheap as $3, €4 or £2 would you still copy them anyway. It seems that copying DVD's, altough it can be a long process, is fun because you know that you have copied and created it yourself. Or is it just me being an idiot?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
You're assuming everyone who uses this site copies dvd's they don't own.
In answer to your question I imagine people who do copy dvd's wouldn't copy them anymore, but the price drop doesn't have to be that dramatic IMO, £2 is a ridiculous suggestion, there's more cost in that after marketing, shipping, artwork, printing, media etc.
If new releases were under a tenner I'm sure they'd be more sales and mess copying, although people will always copy.
Willtgpo, my real dad, told me to make a maximum of 5,806 posts on vcdhelp.com in one lifetime. So I have. -
Originally Posted by Silky31
I've offten thought that about cd-r's. I feel slighted by music company's. If I can buy a blank CD-R for $.25. They MUST be buying them for $.05. They put music on it then charge me $25.99. If they cost $9.99 out the gate... i'd still be buying them. Haven't bought a CD in years.
On the flip side. I would rather pay $22.99 for a DVD (2 hours of entertainment) than $22.99 for a CD (50 minutes). Makes more sense.
While we are at it. When I used to make Music cd-R's at 2X speed it seemed like forever. Yet when I make backup dvd's at 2X speed I feel ok that it took that long. Wierd.
Ok. I'm done.Don't give in to DVD2ONE, that leads to the dark side. -
yeah cuz its worth it to pay that much for a dvd. cds cost the same as (sometimes more than) dvds. 95% of the time, theres only one or two songs on the whole cd that are good. the rest are just space fillers. a dvd on the other hand has the whole movie plus extras like commentary, other language tracks, making of documentaries and deleted scenes. to me its more worth it to buy a dvd than a cd.