Hey there,
I wasn't able to find up-to-date information about this issue.
There was a time, where uploading 1920x1080 clips resulted in quite low quality because 1080 is not able to divide by 16 and that caused quality reduction in the uploaded stuff. People found out that convert videos to 1920x1072 will result way better in quality.
Many followed the guideline to upload:
http://premoguild.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6048
Did youtube fix this issue already, or we should still upload our stuff in 1072 vp?
Support our site by donate $5 directly to us Thanks!!!
Try StreamFab Downloader and download streaming video from Netflix, Amazon!
Try StreamFab Downloader and download streaming video from Netflix, Amazon!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
-
For AVC, 1080 is actually mod16 . Internally it's actually encoded as 1088 . There is crop frame flag that is part of the AVC spec.
Do you have some proof of this "way better quality" , even old examples? I don't believe it for a second -
I can't believe you guys don't know this blatant YouTube bug.
Here's some more info about this issue:
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/CYBQQGXMqqg
some examples (there are some good ones in the topic above aswell):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge5j7dPxpeE vs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkTO1bd8z7Q
My problem is all I can find on this topic is back in around 2011-12 then it ceased. Still can't find any official confirmation about this was being fixed.Last edited by Voxx; 21st Jul 2015 at 01:14.
-
There is no problem now - just test it yourself
That's a completely different topic you linked to - interlaced handling and deinterlacing quality . That is and still a problem . I suspect the people did not do the testing correctly in some of those tests - they probably uploaded the wrong format to cause YT to deinterlace
Maybe you linked to the wrong topic and videos, or you should have a closer look, or maybe you're not comparing it correctly . That's NOT what is occurring in the 1080 vs. 1072 example. There is a massive quality difference when it gets deinterlaced - the text would become illegible . Some parts actually look better on the 1080 version, some worse - this is expected. But those differences are minor. There is not a massive quality loss, as you would expect from being deinterlaced
Similar Threads
-
Resolution : 1080 vs 1072 for Youtube
By prosaplayer1 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 29th Mar 2015, 13:16 -
Youtube supporting 60fps uploads starting today
By roma_turok in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 20Last Post: 5th Nov 2014, 12:10 -
Youtube uploads are choppy :(
By CrystalMethod in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 13Last Post: 7th Mar 2014, 11:12 -
YouTube Playback Issue on Uploads
By Database Ranger in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 10Last Post: 6th Nov 2012, 15:16 -
How to combine more than one video files when uploads them?
By coody in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 2Last Post: 2nd Nov 2010, 12:30