VideoHelp Forum



Support our site by donate $5 directly to us Thanks!!!

Try StreamFab Downloader and download streaming video from Netflix, Amazon!



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Hey there,

    I wasn't able to find up-to-date information about this issue.

    There was a time, where uploading 1920x1080 clips resulted in quite low quality because 1080 is not able to divide by 16 and that caused quality reduction in the uploaded stuff. People found out that convert videos to 1920x1072 will result way better in quality.

    Many followed the guideline to upload:
    http://premoguild.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6048

    Did youtube fix this issue already, or we should still upload our stuff in 1072 vp?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Voxx View Post
    There was a time, where uploading 1920x1080 clips resulted in quite low quality because 1080 is not able to divide by 16 and that caused quality reduction in the uploaded stuff. People found out that convert videos to 1920x1072 will result way better in quality.
    Don't believe it for a moment.

    Probably one a story spread out by 'mod 16 purists' who are quickly losing their relevance.

    Quote Quote  
  3. For AVC, 1080 is actually mod16 . Internally it's actually encoded as 1088 . There is crop frame flag that is part of the AVC spec.

    Do you have some proof of this "way better quality" , even old examples? I don't believe it for a second
    Quote Quote  
  4. I can't believe you guys don't know this blatant YouTube bug.

    Here's some more info about this issue:

    https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/CYBQQGXMqqg

    some examples (there are some good ones in the topic above aswell):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge5j7dPxpeE vs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkTO1bd8z7Q

    My problem is all I can find on this topic is back in around 2011-12 then it ceased. Still can't find any official confirmation about this was being fixed.
    Last edited by Voxx; 21st Jul 2015 at 01:14.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by Voxx View Post
    I can't believe you guys don't know this blatant YouTube bug.

    Here's some more info about this issue:

    https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/CYBQQGXMqqg

    some examples (there are some good ones in the topic above aswell):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge5j7dPxpeE vs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkTO1bd8z7Q

    My problem is all I can find on this topic is back in around 2011-12 then it ceased. Still can't find any official confirmation about this was being fixed.



    There is no problem now - just test it yourself

    That's a completely different topic you linked to - interlaced handling and deinterlacing quality . That is and still a problem . I suspect the people did not do the testing correctly in some of those tests - they probably uploaded the wrong format to cause YT to deinterlace

    Maybe you linked to the wrong topic and videos, or you should have a closer look, or maybe you're not comparing it correctly . That's NOT what is occurring in the 1080 vs. 1072 example. There is a massive quality difference when it gets deinterlaced - the text would become illegible . Some parts actually look better on the 1080 version, some worse - this is expected. But those differences are minor. There is not a massive quality loss, as you would expect from being deinterlaced
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!