Hello,
i have a video file which have 2 different views in different players.
i the screenshot below you can see the view, its like squezed
http://prntscr.com/5lkraz
but in other players or in rendering softwares video comes with fullscreen( No black spaces around no squeze)
http://prntscr.com/5lkshn
Media player detects video as if its 3d but it not.
does anybody have idea how to create that kind of videos?
Thanks
Here is the results of Media info:
General
Complete name :
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media / Version 2
Codec ID : mp42
File size : 1.81 GiB
Duration : 3h 13mn
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Overall bit rate : 1 340 Kbps
Encoded date : UTC 2014-12-20 13:13:55
Tagged date : UTC 2014-12-20 13:13:55
gsst : 0
gstd : 11594116
gssd : B0AFCE1F4HH1419710842348826
gshh : r15---sn-4g57kn7s.googlevideo.com
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L3.1
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 1 frame
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Duration : 3h 13mn
Bit rate : 1 145 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 3 562 Kbps
Width : 1 280 pixels
Height : 720 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.041
Stream size : 1.55 GiB (85%)
Tagged date : UTC 2014-12-20 13:16:16
Audio
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format profile : LC
Codec ID : 40
Duration : 3h 13mn
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 201 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 265 MiB (14%)
Title : IsoMedia File Produced by Google, 5-11-2011
Encoded date : UTC 2014-12-20 13:15:14
Tagged date : UTC 2014-12-20 13:16:16
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
-
pdr is correct, this has nothing to do with 3D as it is. What media player(s) are you using? Nothing about the metadata suggests it's anamorphic either, but that 1st screenshot implies that it is.
Go back to square-one and fix your process.
Scott -
i use latest version of Windows media player. Also tested in different pc's and same result. in windows media player
-
Are you trying to be cute? The 2nd image is in a scaling box, that implies you rescaled the image......
What gives?Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........ -
i did not scaled the image i just tell you differences between 2 players. i am not good with video editing terms. In media player you see the video like in the first screenshot (tested with 3 different pc's). Thats what i call as "3d"
but in other players like mpc you see the video full screen. (Not squezed from left and right) -
Why on earth would you call that 3D?!! If I placed one stereo speaker (say "L") in front of you and the other speaker ("R") behind you, would you think you are hearing in surround? stereo3D is only stereo3D when there are 2 similar-but-not-identical images (where the difference is due to eye perspective). There are plenty of 2D images that are squeezed (anamorphic the most common) and plenty of 3D images that are NOT squeezed. There is only 1 image there, so it cannot be 3D and nothing but YOU is suggesting that it is.
If you have a problem with a certain clip playing properly (re: aspect ratio) in a certain player, explain it that way, upload a short section of the (otherwise unmodified) clip and clearly explain your steps, apps, version#s, etc.
Scott -
if i upload the video in youtube it detects as if the video were 3d. as seen in the screenshots below:
http://prntscr.com/5lmip6 = Flash player
http://prntscr.com/5lmitc = html5 player
There is a hidden trick in the video which causes youtube detects it as 3d, thats what i'm trying to find out
Uploaded file: https://yadi.sk/i/aPVo-EjRdfHpE
Youtube link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujs-9g_noss -
It is not a trick, it is how YT modifies the presentation to accommodate different 3D viewing scenarios. If you don't have 3D footage, you shouldn't use ANY of those scenarios and you shouldn't use the yt3d tagging.
Scott -
i got it, if i render a video with Stereoscopic 3d mode. Youtube detects video as 3d. But in this example. There is no 3d mode but youtube detects the video as 3d.
the uploaded file is rendered version, if you upload the original file yt does not detects it as 3d. -
If you render a video with stereo3D mode, unless it is Dualstream or MVC (or MKV with 3D format metadata), YT cannot detect it as 3D because it is in actuality just a specially-adjusted 2D image. What gets YT viewers able to "view in 3D" does not have anything to do with the video itself (barring those 3 subtype exceptions), but with the yt3d tagging (which can be inserted at upload or after the fact, IIRC).
Your upload is MP4, so even if it WERE 3D. YT would still treat it as 2D until you added the yt3d tagging (because MP4 doesn't have any inherent 3d format metadata).
Scott -
i do not enter any yt3d tags i upload the file and yt detects it as if it were 3d. But i have downloaded the video from youtube using 4k vido downloader.
Maybe the original file was mkv or something else. when i tried to download it asked me if i want to download it as 3d or just 720p. i downloaded both.
720p version is the one which i uploaded. 3d version look like 640*180 -
MVC (or some forms of dual-stream). But that'll do no good if you are uploading to YT, since they re-encode everything.
Scott