Has anyone been successful in ripping Fantastic Mr. Fox. I have tried DVDecrypter and DVDFab 6 with no luck. I'm trying to determine if I have a bad DVD or is this a new anti-copy scheme.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
-
I'm also having problems on a MAC with Mac the ripper. It seems the software thinks the file is bigger than it actually is and gives me the error "won't fit on DVD"
-
I read a similar thing with surrogates, they said when you looked at the dvd in windows explorer it would say it was 49GBs.
-
It appears that the disc was defective. Returned it for a news one. No problems ripping disc.
-
There must be a rash of defective discs that produce huge backup files.
I tried to backup my South Park Season Thirteen(released 03-16-10). The first disc backup was 42GB and the second was 38GB.
BTW-I have never had a disc that I could NOT backup with DVD Decrypter and DVD Shrink(sometimes FixVTS needed).
I was at my wits end, installed a trial version of AnyDVD and CloneDVD, and was able to backup the entire set.
I noticed on the Slysoft forums there are posts about other DVDs with the same problem:
Princess and the Frog
Space Buddies
2012
JMO-I hope these are just flukes and not a sign of state-of-the-art copy protection. I like DVD Decrypter and Shrink, not crazy about AnyDVD; it clashes with Imgburn, plus it's quite pricey.Terror Begins at Home -
What the studios are doing is adding 99 VTS titles with incorrect pointers, when you pop the DVD in a DVD-ROM drive the OS reports a huge file. This type of copy-protection is going to be the standard for the time being because it's effective. DVDFab Passkey or AnyDVD will defeat it, you can also select Main Movie in DVDFab.
-
With as irritating as the newer protections are I cannot help but be impressed with their ingenuity.
-
That has more to do with your taste in films than anything else. If you were a big fan of releases by Disney or Sony, you'd have seen this problem long ago.
No, it's state of the art copy protection. Most studios don't use it due to cost, but some do use it. -
Terror Begins at Home
-
...as irritating as the newer protections are I cannot help but be impressed with their ingenuity.
At this point in time, the "state of the art" in "copy protection" involves (intentional) structural defects, invalid cells, phony title sets, bad sectors, and a filesystem which is so completely screwed up, it can only be described as insanity. The last time I put one of these abominations into a dvd player, I could hear the drive hopping around the disk like a flea on amphetamines...frantically trying to cope with the madness it was confronted with.
While that may be acceptable (or maybe even something to be expected) at a science fair for future-mad-scientist children, the concept of intentionally damaging a product that produces revenue you depend on...is undeniably stupid. Rule #1 of respectable business is "Don't screw your customers".
To be fair, not all studios are guilty of this reprehensible conduct. Some are (apparently) capable of running an honest cost-benefit analysis.
Similar Threads
-
Cable/Fox PC video capture
By frankiecat in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd Dec 2011, 00:24 -
This forum is fantastic
By DVDONE in forum Off topicReplies: 5Last Post: 13th Apr 2010, 15:40 -
Fantastic, runs on Windows 7 64-bit!!!
By RealJB in forum SVCD2DVD & VOB2MPGReplies: 4Last Post: 3rd Jul 2009, 10:34 -
Question about HCEnc's Fox Matrices
By CubDukat in forum Video ConversionReplies: 0Last Post: 31st May 2007, 13:57