VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. 8th Feb 2010 13:12 #1
    catracho2009
    catracho2009 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Honduras
    Search Comp PM
    Hi,

    held needed

    which is better ffdshow or coreAVC to used for h264/mpeg-4 avc?
    Quote Quote  
  2. 8th Feb 2010 13:35 #2
    Khaver
    Khaver is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    coreAVC is better at decoding (easier on CPU) though it's not free. ffdshow uses more CPU but it's free. It also has a bunch of filters built in that you can use.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 8th Feb 2010 13:47 #3
    catracho2009
    catracho2009 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Honduras
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks for your reply.

    CoreAVC don't have nothing to do with encoding process?
    Quote Quote  
  4. 8th Feb 2010 14:00 #4
    Khaver
    Khaver is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    CoreAVC is a decoder only. At one time they were going to produce an encoder but I haven't heard anything more about that.
    Quote Quote  
  5. 9th Feb 2010 11:38 #5
    catracho2009
    catracho2009 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Honduras
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks Khaver for your reply.

    Which Player need to have good performance with coreAVC? nero player don't work with it.
    Quote Quote  
  6. 9th Feb 2010 12:53 #6
    Khaver
    Khaver is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Try Media Player Classic.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!