I thought the 4:3 and 16:9 issue was already settled. Why then are some LCD monitors intended for PC use 16:10 as in 1440x900 or 1680x1050?? Try as I might I can't seem to find out where 16:10 originated . Did a committee create it? Why not just stick to 16:9? The difference in 16:9 & 16:10 is obvious when I connect my HDMI equipped DVD player to my 1440x900 monitor; of course there is slight vertical stretching.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
For the nth time, with the possible exception of certain Intel processors, I don't have/ever owned anything whose name starts with "i".
-
Originally Posted by turk690
Separately and in isolation the computer display people continue to generate "VESA" resolutions based on H&V binary addressing so frame buffer memory and plasma/LCD/etc. pixel addressing match without scaling at "native resolution".Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about -
TV and PC use different pixels, non-square vs square and different resolutions
you can buy a 17" or even 15" monitor with 2048 horiz pixel res
put you won't find a TV with that rating -
There were two resolution points where 16:9 was a forced match (not binary beautiful but square pixels) and these were added to the computer spec.
1366x768
1920x1080Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about
Similar Threads
-
What's a good way to capture online video with good quality?
By newtie in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 19th Feb 2011, 09:41 -
What are good specs for a high-quality MP4 file? (Will look good on my 40&q
By HarlanPepper in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 11th Feb 2009, 03:18 -
Looking for some good instrumental music that would be good for football.
By ingeborgdot in forum AudioReplies: 8Last Post: 26th Nov 2007, 21:18