VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Member turk690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    ON, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    I thought the 4:3 and 16:9 issue was already settled. Why then are some LCD monitors intended for PC use 16:10 as in 1440x900 or 1680x1050?? Try as I might I can't seem to find out where 16:10 originated . Did a committee create it? Why not just stick to 16:9? The difference in 16:9 & 16:10 is obvious when I connect my HDMI equipped DVD player to my 1440x900 monitor; of course there is slight vertical stretching.
    For the nth time, with the possible exception of certain Intel processors, I don't have/ever owned anything whose name starts with "i".
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by turk690
    I thought the 4:3 and 16:9 issue was already settled. Why then are some LCD monitors intended for PC use 16:10 as in 1440x900 or 1680x1050?? Try as I might I can't seem to find out where 16:10 originated . Did a committee create it? Why not just stick to 16:9? The difference in 16:9 & 16:10 is obvious when I connect my HDMI equipped DVD player to my 1440x900 monitor; of course there is slight vertical stretching.
    16:9 resulted for psychological research in Japan and MIT. Binary math didn't enter into the decision since Japan's first system was analog and the American ATSC system assumed a "rubber sheet" scaled display that can handle many resolutions. ATSC referenced the work done for ITU-REC-601 (later MPeg2 and DVD) that led to the 16:9 wide format definition.

    Separately and in isolation the computer display people continue to generate "VESA" resolutions based on H&V binary addressing so frame buffer memory and plasma/LCD/etc. pixel addressing match without scaling at "native resolution".
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    TV and PC use different pixels, non-square vs square and different resolutions

    you can buy a 17" or even 15" monitor with 2048 horiz pixel res

    put you won't find a TV with that rating
    Quote Quote  
  4. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    However there are a number of low budget LCD TVs that do run at 1440 x 900 or 1680 x 1050 16:10 AR. Basically just low end monitors with a cheap digital tuner card thrown in. 500:1 contrast ratio as well. Damned ugly.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Computer monitor engineers and TV display engineers don't talk to each other.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    There were two resolution points where 16:9 was a forced match (not binary beautiful but square pixels) and these were added to the computer spec.

    1366x768
    1920x1080
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!