VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Quality is important to me but not to the point where the encoding process is so slow I grow extra grey hairs while waiting.

    I understand there's usually a trade off between quality and processing time and want to find the right balance between the 2 and which application/solution will solve this quest with your help and input.

    What are the pros and cons of each?

    If you've tried,tested and evaluated several or all of them,what ultimately satisfied you and why was that?

    Is it absolutely a necessity to pay $50-75 (or more) for Procoder or Main Concepts basic encoder?Are these head and shoulders qualitywise above and beyond the rest?

    I'm trying to save on experimentation time and to get on with my projects with the goal of being reasonably happy with the results!

    Love to hear from you.

    Thanks,
    Bruce
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    I use tmpgenc plus 2.5. Have been for years and like the quality and features. I haven't had any need to try anything else.

    I also use Tmpgenc Dvd Author 2.0 for making my dvds.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  3. I'm happy with MainConcept MPEG Encoder.You can tweak its settings to ensure better quality eg Motion Search,bitrate ect.... easily,whilst still getting fast encoding speeds.It's only downside is that its quite expensive and tends to soften the picture a little,but that dont bother me.
    The TMPGEnc series of products are what I'd consider best regarding quality but is a little slower.

    For transcoding,DVDShrink is still the best IMO and even using deep analysis and AEC,I get fast speed on my PC setup.
    ~Luke~
    Quote Quote  
  4. I use Avisynth and CCE. Perhaps as fast as any, and IMO not giving up any quality. You can generate a simple Avisynth script with FitCD, especially useful if any resizing is involved. Then edit the script if you need to apply any filters. The advantages are that there are an astounding number of free filters available, and filtering in Avisynth is quicker generally than using built-in filters.

    So if you're willing to gain a minimal knowledge of Avisynth, you could actually use a free encoder like QuEnc or HCEnc. They're not bad, and in my experience a bit quicker than TMPGEnc.

    Good luck.
    Pull! Bang! Darn!
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member sacajaweeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Would I lie?
    Search Comp PM
    CCE with AviSynth for speed & quality.
    "There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge, and I knew we'd get into that rotten stuff pretty soon." -- Raoul Duke
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Somewhere
    Search Comp PM
    Bruce ,

    Hi. I want to recommend womble MPEG Video Wizard for you. It's contains many features that i like: frame accurate editing, fastest scrubbing of any MPEG editor, fastest frame stepping, and no re-encoding when editing DVD-compliant MPEG captures from the latest hardware boxes.

    Wish to help you.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    QuEnc encoder (as it's free, and not bad in the quality area either).
    DVDShrink for DVD transcoding, ReJig for mpeg transcoding.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member AlanHK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Search Comp PM
    I'm happy with HCEnc (freeware). After playing around with it for a while I can set it up to batch convert files overnight, so the speed doesn't bother me much. Takes about twice the running time to encode an AVI to DVD MPG at best quality on my PC. It runs via Avisyth, so with the right filters you can do just about any kind of file.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member Paul_G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    Avisynth/fit2disc and CCE (with CCEfront) for 352x480(576) and 704/720x480(576) and Tmpgenc for 352x240(288), author with dvdauthorgui.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member gadgetguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    West Mitten, USA
    Search Comp PM
    QuEnc. Free, good quality, reasonable encode time, excellent customizable options, encodes AC3 audio as well as video, and did I mention it's free?
    I wasn't impressed with Tmpgenc, but I only experimented with it for the trial period. Perhaps with more experience with it, I could have gotten better results, but I doubt it would have been any better than the results I get with QuEnc.
    "Shut up Wesley!" -- Captain Jean-Luc Picard
    Buy My Books
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Search Comp PM
    TMPGenc 3.0 xpress .... quality depends on the settings used (ie bitrate and codec etc)
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right here
    Search Comp PM
    I am quite happy with my Tmpgenc 2.524. If I was to change, I would try QuEnc. I'm sort of allergic to CCE, don't know why, really.
    DVDShrink is a "must have" IMO.

    Cheers
    They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety. (Benjamin Franklin).
    Quote Quote  
  13. Originally Posted by NormaJ
    I'm sort of allergic to CCE, don't know why, really.
    Same feelings here about CCE.

    MC Encoder and TMPGEnc Plus for me,I dont need bother looking for a replacement.
    ~Luke~
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!