One more stab (pun intended) at trying to convince consumers to go with DRM-full and Value-less media--One-play-only media from Micro$oft!
See the article here.
Once again we must send a unified, clear message that consumers want to be the ones in control of their viewing habits, not "content providers"!
Scott
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
-
-
When will MS ever learn?
Cant they see previous attempts (Divx, Disposable DVDs etc) failed. -
"The revolutionary product could be on the market as early as next year, with the new DVD players needed to view them."
Oh yeah, I'm gonna go right out and drop $$$ on another player just to watch these 'throw-away'...
"Hollywood’s movie moguls are said to be excited at the prospect of having a piracy-proof means of distribution."
There isn't, nor will there ever be, any such thing..."To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research." - Steven Wright
"Megalomaniacal, and harder than the rest!" -
Exactly. Oh, look at that, its not piracy proof.Originally Posted by Ironballs
Stop wasting your time hollywood. There is no such thing as piracy-proof. Someone, somewhere will find out how. -
This reminds me of the pizza scenario.
Pizza parlor opens up, lasts maybe a year or two, then goes out of business. Then another pizza parlor opens up in the same spot. Then, it too goes out of business, then another opens up. When you ask why they open up a pizza parlor in the exact same spot as two previously failed ones, the reply is "Oh my pizza is better"...
Not the lack of demand, not the amount of competition, not that its a bad locale, it's because the other two owners must not have known what they were doing but I do. Idiots. -
It was kinda funny to read though. There would be no market for these things. It's been proven that consumers do not want or need "throw aways". Hollywood and the industry should be investing money in network based DRM, so they can unobtrusively control their content, keep tabs on our viewing habits, and shut down networked devices known to be playing illegal media.
The best prevention for piracy of entertainment is to force a thief to have to buy new equipment after their previous equipment was shutdown due to their illegal habits. -
I think their money is better spent giving customers what they really want, not what M$ wants them to want.Originally Posted by ROF
#1: I personally will probably NEVER get VOD/PPV/etc. for Movies/Music/Books/Anything with the possible exception of when I'm out-of-town at a hotel. Main reason: Not that suckered into the Pavlovian, Consumerist, Impulse-buying craze. 2nd reason: I don't want anybody "tracking" my habits, except God (and Santa Claus).
#2: Real "pirates" are going to get around this whole "authentication" rigmarole fairly easily. If they are already making money at it, they'll find a way to continue. I can guess at one way right off the bat, but don't want to adversely influence anyone.
Scott -
You will always have to buy your products with cash only, never use a check, bank card, debit card, credit card, or other forms of money. You must also never file your taxes with itemized deductions, plus a myraid of other situations where tracking of consumption is done.Originally Posted by Cornucopia
Sorry, there is no way to bypass a flag that's embedded in a transmission unless you intercept the transmission before the flag is inserted. I just hope the next generation set top devices are networked so pirates are forced to buy new equipment each time they are caught. Too much money is spent prosecuting them when it could be better to have them required to buy new functional equipment after being shut down because of their illegal tactics. That will benefit everyone who obeys these content laws.Originally Posted by Cornucopia -
#1- I very often only buy via cash.Originally Posted by ROF
#2- Checks/BankCards/Debit/Credit Cards have very strict privacy laws already in place to protect the consumer. Laws regarding the BF and other internet processes are tenuous at best.
#3- If it's an actual "flag" (or even series of flags) and not an actual encryption, any smart, parsing packet sniffer can switch that flag off. Just like there are already devices (under litigation) that defeat Macrovision, CGMS, SCMS, etc.
#4- If they stopped throwing money away trying to plug every leak in the swiss cheese levee, and spent time on creating value-added, intelligent, and APPROPRIATELY PRICED content, there wouldn't even be much of a pirate market to begin with.
Scott
>>>>>>>>
edit: I also DON'T itemize, as it's not worth it on my piss-poor salary.
:P
-
Really? And you actually trust them? How many times have you read about networks being hacked and CC or other financial information being stolen? BTW, Do you trust the waiter with your credit card? Debit Card? Wireless technology is a beautiful thing and pocket PCs can attach card scanners. You could pay for a $30 meal and wind up also buying a new surf board and a complete line of swim apparel. It doesn't take much. That waiter could even tack on another customers bill and you wouldn't know until you checked, your bill was delivered to your house, or you are overdrawn. Sorry if I made you a little paranoid with this, but it has and does occur where a scam artist takes a job for a week or so and secretly rings up $1000's of dollars in transactions from his or her tipping customers. Try and prove that you only bought one meal at a restaurant when 8 of them were charged to your CC or DC. You were at the restaurant weren't you? Some people think internet transactions are the only insecure way to charge things. Restaurants have a much higher scamming rate and they've been doing it before the word internet was invented.Originally Posted by Cornucopia
Again, that's a violation of the law and can be punished by several years in jail and thousands of dollars in fines. If you live in the US and you buy such a device outside of your State of Residence it's not the local authorities who will be prosecuting you. You've commited inter-state fraud which is prosecuted in federal court. Is it really worth it to avoid paying a bill?Originally Posted by Cornucopia
I'd try to answer this but you make no sense. If it's unintelligent, no value added entertainment, why are people wasting hundreds of dollars on equipment and blank media to archive such content? Because it has value, it's good enough to copy and keep or sell. The price of DVDs is about $10 or $20 for new releases. You can even find them for only a few dollars if you shop around. The price is more than appropriate considering music CD are rarely below $10 even for used ones. The price of a movie ticket averages $7, while sporting/concert events tickets cost $30 or more. The price to own DVD media is cheap. The price for stealing media can be very costly. The cost to the industry for each thievery can not be calculated, but depending on the thieves intent it could cost the industry billions in lost revenue. Saying you weren't going to buy it to begin with is no excuse to steal it.Originally Posted by Cornucopia -
Credit cards have straightforward ways of redressing mistakes--And most CC companies give their client the benefit of the doubt. Plus, there's always a receipt that you keep that says you only had 1 meal. That doesn't really happen to me because I'm don't waste my credit limit on consumeables like dinner.Originally Posted by ROF
...
It's not a violation of the law to buy a standard electronic device. If there is litigation that says it violates DCMA or similar, once that has been established/proven and judgement given, those devices would be removed from the market. And the courts don't go and trace back past customers.
"Fraud"? what are you talking about?
Originally, I was just commenting that it wasn't "impossible" to break the BF. And I would expect PC software to be the most likely place that would happen, not a hardware device, although that's possible.
...
The whole value-added/piracy arguement has been done to death here before, so I'm not going to continue that line.
I notice that a number of your posts are word-for-word reprints of MPAA/RIAA postings I have seen on other sites. Clearly, you want to give Big Business the benefit of the doubt (even though they have proven many times to not be worthy of such trust), while I give Consumers the benefit of the doubt.
Scott -
MOVE ALONG! NOthing to see here!
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/10/05/2344240&tid=109&tid=188&tid=97
Similar Threads
-
1st Post Hello EVERYONE!
By V12V12 in forum Off topicReplies: 17Last Post: 4th Mar 2009, 05:15 -
A 1st. botched trial of AVStoDVD
By Seeker47 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 25th Dec 2008, 10:23 -
Help with 1st up of Kiss DP-1600
By GJLCAP in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 1Last Post: 4th Aug 2008, 15:52 -
Panasonic DMR-E55-E55S or E55K?1st DVD recorder/1st time posting
By ToeTagged in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 7Last Post: 19th Jan 2008, 15:33 -
my 1st dvd recorder
By M-girl in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 20Last Post: 11th May 2007, 01:15


Quote
