VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Member lumis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the remnants of pangea
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  
  2. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    If you're going to do it, do it right.



    Here's one for yoda as well.


    Can you tell that I have too much time on my hands?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member lumis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the remnants of pangea
    Search Comp PM
    thanks shadowmistress,

    i'm not very leet, so i dont know how to make the background transparent.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jimmalenko
    I dont think lumis sig falls into this category. Its not against the forum rules and neither is it danasoft (it does not have the danasoft website displayed)
    Quote Quote  
  5. VH Veteran jimmalenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Down under
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by waheed
    Originally Posted by jimmalenko
    I dont think lumis sig falls into this category. Its not against the forum rules and neither is it danasoft (it does not have the danasoft website displayed)
    Not to be rude, but you can think what you like. It is in fact the Moderators' decision, and Lordsmurf seems to think that it does in fact fall into this category, hence his inclusion here:

    https://www.videohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1339894#1339894
    Originally Posted by Lordsmurf
    If in doubt, Google it.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    I took it as if Lordsmurf was just taking a tongue in cheek poke at that sig since the subject was brought up. I can't see that breaking any rules as who would it annoy enough to complain about it?

    LS? Care to weigh in on this one?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member waheed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Search Comp PM
    Shadowmistress is right.

    jimmalenko, I think lordsmurf included that as a joke, not to be taken seriously. You can PM him if you wish to confirm this. Theres nothing wrong with the sig, theres no hyperlink, advertisement, spam or any of that kind within lumis sig which breaks the rules.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member lumis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the remnants of pangea
    Search Comp PM
    not taking in to consideration that it is my signature, i have to agree with shadowmistress & waheed.. its not an advertisement, not hyperlinked, it doesnt display your computer information. and not spam as waheed said.. when it all comes down to it, its just a gif of a cartoon holding a sign..

    if someone used a picture similar to the one below (maybe with a different message, like "i like video") would it be against the rules? i think not.

    Quote Quote  
  9. VH Veteran jimmalenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Down under
    Search PM


    I can't believe anyone really gives a shit
    If in doubt, Google it.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!