Do you gain anything by encoding a file with a 352x240 resolution to VCD at 720x480? I would think you would be best to encode at the original resolution but I have heard that it is always better to encode at the higher res if your DVD player will play it....mine will. I always encode to XVCD at bitrate of 2000.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
No, that wouldn't improve anything. This would simply quadruple the number of pixels (and hence macroblocks) that would need to be encoded, yielding a net loss of quality.
If you want to see the result, give it a try!
It is a common suggestion to use a higher resolution if your player will support it, but this assumes you captured at a higher resolution so there's more detail in the source. Stretching a 352x240 file to 720x480 doesn't increase the detail, it just gives you more redundant pixels. -
But if you pump up the bit rate REALLY high to like 3500k/s it might look okay.
Similar Threads
-
Difference/Relationship among encoding, re-encoding & decoding?
By iqbal88 in forum DVD RippingReplies: 12Last Post: 19th Aug 2011, 14:46 -
How to add watermark to VCD without Re-Encoding?
By shebi in forum Authoring (VCD/SVCD)Replies: 25Last Post: 26th Apr 2009, 09:26 -
PAL VCD -> Proper NTSC DVD w/o Re-Encoding?
By SanctimoniousApe in forum Video ConversionReplies: 8Last Post: 4th Apr 2009, 17:59 -
Tool for VCD at 2500 bitrate with No Re-encoding
By whenloverageswild in forum Authoring (VCD/SVCD)Replies: 21Last Post: 6th Mar 2009, 11:34 -
Burning VCD/Svcd mpg files to dvd without encoding
By Morb1ous in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd Aug 2007, 16:56