Just got some Inkjet printable Prodisc 8x from Meritline. The problem is when I try to print on the disc. It appears that the ink is not being absorbed by the white surface. Has anyone else had this problem.
My Prodisc 4x has sort of a matte finish, but these 8x have more of a glossy finish.
Whats up?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 27 of 27
-
-
I have heard people letting these discs dry for VERY long periods of time.
-
I would do that but the printing looks terrible, it is essentially a bunch of ink spots on the disc.
-
I ordered the Prodisc 4x inkject printable 102-221-100
This is what they claim they sent me 102-279-100
http://store.yahoo.com/meritline/prodisc-8x-dvd-r-white-inkjet-printable.html
But I think 888888 might be right, these may be thermal printable. -
Originally Posted by dflukeWant my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
My brain farted. . . . I meant thermal printable . . . .
These disc have been a pain. . . . I first had to flash my burner for it to be able to burn them. Now that I got that working . . it appears that I may have gotten the wrong ones after all.
No one every said DVDs were easy . . . . sigh -
The link that you provided do take us to the White Inkjet Printable Prodiscs. I have been using themfor quite some time and have not seen the problem that you are mentioning.
-
aanaravs or anyone who has used these discs before, can you discribe the surface. The 8x ones I recieved has a slightly glossy finish.
The 4x Prodiscs that I have recieved have more of a matte finish. -
These 8X Prodiscs can be any of 4 different media codes. It does not suprise me that you received other than you expected. Supermedia, Rima and Meritline all have trouble getting a straight answer as to what they will get in each shipment. I would avoid them; some of the media codes do not play well with certain burners. Now you have found an additional reason.
Still a few bugs in the system... -
Just a thought -- and you've probably already tried it -- but I used to get these spots when I would forget to select the "best photo quality". ALso, there's usually an option to say that you are printing on cd/dvds rather than paper.
I'm sure you're aware of this, but I figure if I forgot, then anybody can (it helps my self esteem). -
Its definitely a surface problem. Its close to 24 hours since I tried to print on the disc. I can wipe it with a clean cloth and remove any ink on the surface. It looks brand new.
-
Originally Posted by dfluke
-
Now if I could only get Meritline to respond to my e-mails concerning this issue. I should have listened to those who warned me about Meritline.
-
dfluke, you're not alone. My friend did also order 400 of 8x white inkjet printable Prodisc... and they were turned out exactly what you got... I told him better call meritline or email them to have an exchange...
-
Sent my disks back on Saturday. Waiting to see what Meritline is going to do. A lot of people have said that Meritline is an up-and-up company so I'm waiting to see what they are going to do. This could end up being very expensive disks or a very expensive lesson.
Hope things work out for your friend. -
Just recieved my disk from Meritline. 50 MCC ...02 and 50 PRODISC F01
Not sure if I'm a happy camper . . . . -
Originally Posted by dfluke
See here for more info:
https://www.videohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=249602Still a few bugs in the system... -
i've been using the prodisc, because i bought a 100 of them(big mistake), and have never had a printing problem with them. However, I find I better not burn any more than 4 gigs on them, or the picture jumps all over the place at the end.
member since 1843 -
Originally Posted by chas0039
Thanks -
Originally Posted by jackedup
If you can tolerate 4X then Prodisc seems to be either S03 or MCC, both of which are good. S03 burns much better with a 3500 or a 108, but scans from older burners are OK and consistently readable. Rima would be my source here again as they are usually able to tell you what code you will get. Prodisc has problems with printable surfaces but their matte surface is much easier to keep clean compared to shiny. I will be very annoyed when these are gone and 8X is all that is left.
Every time I look for a deal on +R I get stuck with Ritek R03 or worse. These vary all over the place and can change quality in the middle of the stack. Most other good +R are next to impossible to find as they are sold branded and the company changes media codes often so I avoid the +R problems.
I have yet to find a good -RW so I stick to +RW from Ritek. They always seem to be W11 code and I got my last batch for only 32 cents each, delivered. The scan from these is in the low 20s for PI; remarkably good on my Liteon.
Hope this helps.Still a few bugs in the system... -
Also looking for a decent (and consistant) brand of printable media. I was using Prodisc 4X and loved them for the first 48 burns. Now all I get is coasters! Using a Liteon 851S.
-
Originally Posted by chas0039
I use printable disks pretty much all the time. I liked the Prodisk S03 but don't like the S04 and from what I have read here the F01 is not very good nor is the MCC. I can't seem to find S03 disks anymore but wish I could as I had great luck with them.
I notice you recommend Ritek for non-printables but not for printables, is there a reason for that? I was thinking of trying them but if there is problems with their printables don't want to waste the money.
Thanks again -
[quote="jackedup"]
Originally Posted by chas0039Still a few bugs in the system...
Similar Threads
-
Prodisc - One foot in the grave
By SCDVD in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 13th Aug 2008, 22:15 -
Meritline TY Final Sale
By terryj in forum MediaReplies: 2Last Post: 21st May 2008, 11:37 -
8x TYs From Meritline materially changed
By slacker in forum MediaReplies: 5Last Post: 5th Dec 2007, 16:09 -
Meritline - still in business?
By CBC in forum Off topicReplies: 3Last Post: 5th Dec 2007, 08:23 -
Samsung DVD+R 8x $5 per 25 at Meritline
By bevills1 in forum MediaReplies: 2Last Post: 16th Jun 2007, 16:56