VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. Can you guys list the best parts to build a computer. For example, what is the best:

    1. Motherboard
    2. CPU
    3. Memory
    4. Hard Drive
    5. Video Card
    6. Sound Card

    List the best hardware in for these categories...
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member The village idiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adrift among the STUPID
    Search Comp PM
    1. four or more 64 bit processors
    2. 64 bit processors
    3. Memory that fits the above board about 8GB worth
    4. 10,000 rpm SCSI LVD320 drives in raid 5+ configuration
    5. not really sure about this, something with several DVI outputs
    6. not sure again

    Via has a 4 processor Optoron board, not sure I would reccommend that one, but maybe someone else's board.
    Hope is the trap the world sets for you every night when you go to sleep and the only reason you have to get up in the morning is the hope that this day, things will get better... But they never do, do they?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member holistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    here & there
    Search Comp PM
    Price range? ... .
    Best today or a week from now.!
    RED ones are BEST.
    Quote Quote  
  4. 15K Scsis would do a better job
    Quote Quote  
  5. 1. four or more 64 bit processors
    2. 64 bit processors
    3. Memory that fits the above board about 8GB worth
    4. 10,000 rpm SCSI LVD320 drives in raid 5+ configuration
    5. not really sure about this, something with several DVI outputs
    6. not sure again
    I dont mean this high tech. I meant for the average person. For example an Intel or Asus motherboard. Western Digital 250 Hard Drive... etc...
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Hawaii
    Search Comp PM
    This is an extremely open ended, highly opinionated subject. I would suggest you set a budget and say what you're going to use the computer for.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member The village idiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adrift among the STUPID
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by nissmo300
    1. four or more 64 bit processors
    2. 64 bit processors
    3. Memory that fits the above board about 8GB worth
    4. 10,000 rpm SCSI LVD320 drives in raid 5+ configuration
    5. not really sure about this, something with several DVI outputs
    6. not sure again
    I dont mean this high tech. I meant for the average person. For example an Intel or Asus motherboard. Western Digital 250 Hard Drive... etc...
    What do you mean? That is only slightly above what I would normally run . If I had the room and money available I would have never built this SS50 that I use, it would have been a dual something or other. And quads are just starting to move into the nearly expensive range. I would still say a dual with either firewire 800 ide raid, or internal ide raid, maybe now SATA raid. I really wish Intel didn't screw everyone with the P4. Notice that only the Xeon is MP capable, not the whole line like it was with the PIII and lower. That was the other thing that divided the Pentiums from the Celerons, celerons would not do SMP.
    Hope is the trap the world sets for you every night when you go to sleep and the only reason you have to get up in the morning is the hope that this day, things will get better... But they never do, do they?
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member The village idiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adrift among the STUPID
    Search Comp PM
    BTW, you did say best
    Hope is the trap the world sets for you every night when you go to sleep and the only reason you have to get up in the morning is the hope that this day, things will get better... But they never do, do they?
    Quote Quote  
  9. I was thinking along the lines of this kind of setup:

    1. Asus P4C800 E-Deluxe P4 875P/FSB800
    2. Intel Pentium 4 3.20 (800FSB & HT)
    3. 1GB Corsair DDR500 Mhz PC4000 64-bit Dual-Channel
    4. Dual 250 GB Western Digital Sata-500 RAID
    5. nVidia GeForce FX5900 Ultra 256MB 850Mhz DDR
    6. SoundBlaster Audigy 2 7.1 Dolby Digital Surround Sound

    7. 8X DVD+/-RW Plextor Dual Format DVD Burner


    How is this system?
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member housepig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    the Plains of Leng
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by nissmo300
    How is this system?
    overpowered for playing Solitaire, yet underpowered for real-time High-Definition 3D animation rendering....

    what do you want to do with it?
    - housepig
    ----------------
    Housepig Records
    out now:
    Various Artists "Six Doors"
    Unicorn "Playing With Light"
    Quote Quote  
  11. Originally Posted by nissmo300
    I was thinking along the lines of this kind of setup:

    4. Dual 250 GB Western Digital Sata-500 RAID
    5. nVidia GeForce FX5900 Ultra 256MB 850Mhz DDR
    6. SoundBlaster Audigy 2 7.1 Dolby Digital Surround Sound

    How is this system?
    just my opinions:

    try to find info on decibel levels for different sata hard drives, some can be quite loud. i have never used any western digital drives so don't know about them (i use seagate).

    the ati 9800 256MB beats the fx5900 on all test runs, so go for ati.

    i use an audigy 2. it's a quality sound card, much better than onboard audio.
    Quote Quote  
  12. contrarian rallynavvie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minnesotan in Texas
    Search Comp PM
    See, you already had something in mind, stop playin' us

    Single processors are for chumps, get at least two of them working for you. Then you can do an encode on one CPU and play Battlefield on the other, or use both to do your encode to make it go twice as fast. Let's see the HT try that

    If you do go dual get the latest Tyan board like the Thunder, or get the MSI K7D Master. Both have some nice onboard options. Then put two Athlon MP2800s on it. Drop about a GB of Mushkin RAM in it and the board is set. For hard drives you may as well start out using SATA since it seems to be here for good. SCSI is great but it gets expensive fast, especially SCSI RAID. Get some WD Raptors or something. The video card isn't very useful for digital video surprisingly, so unless you're doing 3D effects just an average card will do. The GeForce vs Radeon bit is played out, get whatever one you can find a better deal on. Better yet get a hardware MPEG encoder like the Canopus DV Storm 2 so you can save on some of the processor speed for work with MPEG2. For an audio card I use the Hercules cards, I get IRQ conflicts with SB products.

    What am I missing?
    Quote Quote  
  13. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    see my profile
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member The village idiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adrift among the STUPID
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by BJ_M
    see my profile
    I was waiting for that

    That quad must be nice to work with. And it does qualify for supercomputer status at a sustaied greater than 1 Gigaflops per for all tasks, though I think most dual Xeon P4 will also make that mark now as well as new dual Macs.
    Hope is the trap the world sets for you every night when you go to sleep and the only reason you have to get up in the morning is the hope that this day, things will get better... But they never do, do they?
    Quote Quote  
  15. I would buy AMD vs. Intel. They always out perform Intel. Besides that look at the date stamped on the CPU. Brand outta the box Processors usually have a date made stamp from 2 years ago. Which can only mean one thing.... What do they have on the shelves right now... 5gig, 6 gig...10GIG!!! Intel is going down the tubes and will outta business in the next 5 years.

    Just my .02¢
    Quote Quote  
  16. Originally Posted by 808smokey
    I would buy AMD vs. Intel. They always out perform Intel. Besides that look at the date stamped on the CPU. Brand outta the box Processors usually have a date made stamp from 2 years ago. Which can only mean one thing.... What do they have on the shelves right now... 5gig, 6 gig...10GIG!!! Intel is going down the tubes and will outta business in the next 5 years.

    Just my .02¢
    From my experiences I have never met an AMD that outperforms a same spec Intel. All my processors have had a date stamp that is only a month old so I don't know how you have got that info, unless you are buying older processors that don't sell quickly and a re left on the shelves for a long time. Intel will not go down the tubes, they have too much funding to make that happen (corporate contracts, governement contracts etc.), plus they have a new processor round the corner (probably will not be 64bit though which would be pretty dissapointing).

    On your point though, there is now not much difference in processors (the main real difference being the safety function of the Intels), and the new 64bit AMDs with 1MB of L2 cache do look pretty good in comparison to the Intels on the market at the moment. It is all because Intel went slow and decided the P4 could ride it out for a bit longer.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by 808smokey
    I would buy AMD vs. Intel. They always out perform Intel. Besides that look at the date stamped on the CPU. Brand outta the box Processors usually have a date made stamp from 2 years ago. Which can only mean one thing.... What do they have on the shelves right now... 5gig, 6 gig...10GIG!!! Intel is going down the tubes and will outta business in the next 5 years.

    Just my .02¢

    cpus you buy in the box are not made 2 years ago unless you buy a 2 year old one on purpose (where the heck do you shop?) ...

    intel is not going down the tubes anytime soon ... in fact the cpu p4 bussness is only a small part of thier overall company ..
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  18. Originally Posted by 808smokey
    Brand outta the box Processors usually have a date made stamp from 2 years ago.
    Why are you buying 2 year old chips? It does save you money

    Originally Posted by 808smokey
    Which can only mean one thing.... What do they have on the shelves right now... 5gig, 6 gig...10GIG!!! Intel is going down the tubes and will outta business in the next 5 years.
    Just my .02¢
    Hate to hear what you can come up with if you spend 3 cents instead of 2
    tgpo famous MAC commercial, You be the judge?
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    I use the FixEverythingThat'sWrongWithThisVideo() filter. Works perfectly every time.
    Quote Quote  
  19. I'm not saying go and buy 2 year old chips. I'm saying that AMD devleoped the technolgy 2 years ago. Even there new 64 chips are over a year old. Intel can't keep up. As soon as intel put out there best chip, AMD giggles and says OK, wait... BAM!!! here's something better that we've had for 2 years. Look at this chip, the latest and greatest:

    AMD Athlon 64 ADA3200AEP5AP
    1MB L2 Cache, 1600 Mhz Bus, The ONLY 64-bit Windows Compatible PC Processor

    http://www.newegg.com/app/Showimage.asp?image=19-103-413-01.JPG

    See the date on it? 2001
    Quote Quote  
  20. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    thats a copywrite for thier logo date .. not the date the chip was made..

    chips are patented -- not copywrited ..

    AMD devleoped the technolgy 2 years ago
    what technolgy ? I have had 64bit workstations made in 1996 even .. we have many now -- 64bit chips been around a LONG time (ask HP , IBM SGI , and others) ..

    AMD has some really great products - there is no doubt ... but so does intel .. im just glad there are both because we all reap the rewards ..
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  21. I find that hard to believe.
    what technolgy ? I have had 64bit workstations made in 1996 even .. we have many now -- 64bit chips been around a LONG time (ask HP , IBM SGI , and others) ..
    You've had 64 bit processors since 1996. That's impossible.

    AMD launched the first AMD64 processor, the AMD Opteron™ processor for servers and workstations, on April 22, 2003. AMD will launch the next AMD64 processor, the AMD Athlon™ 64 processor – the first and only 64-bit processor for Windows®-based desktop and mobile PCs – on September 23, 2003.
    Quote Quote  
  22. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    i'm sorry to burst your bubble -- but you may have to learn a lot of computers and advertising untruths..

    also -- read CAREFULLY amd's marketing hype (which even then is not 100% correct) , they may also have hired someone from apple's marketing dept. - as apple is also advertising nonsense..

    the first and only 64-bit processor for Windows®-based desktop and mobile PCs
    Windows NT 4 was available for alpha systems several years ago and you can still buy it (it comes on the standard install cd and is still sold for embedded systems .. the alpha chip is/was a 64 bit chip and nt4 ran great on it . So AMD is smoking crack on that point , there were even alpha based laptops built !! ..

    AMD launched the first AMD64 processor
    well yes -- i suppose AMD DID build the first AMD 64 bit proccessor , just like NEC built thier proccessor and MIPS built thier proccessor and IBM built thiers also and so forth ... and so on ..

    Now a little history on some of the systems I use -- which back in 1992 were producing 64bit cpu 's for workstations (and still are)


    MIPS R8000
    Brief Description
    The first superscalar implementation of the MIPS architecture is the R8000 (code name "TFP") that has been introduced in July 1994. It is a 64bit RISC microprocessor with strong emphasis on floating point performance, that is spcifically designed for supercomputing applications.

    Key Features
    Multicomponent chipset consisting of an integer unit (IU), floating-point unit (FPU), tag RAMs, and 4 MB of data-streaming cache
    True 64-bit microprocessor with 64-bit integer and floating-point operations, registers, and virtual addresses
    Funcitonal Units: 2x Load/Store, 2x ALU, 1x Shifter, 1x Integer Multiply/Divide, 2x FPU
    Four-way superscalar architecture, so 4 functional units can operate concurrently (any combination allowed)
    16 KB of instruction cache (I-cache) in IU, 16 KB of dual-ported data cache (D-cache) in IU, 1 K entries of branch prediction cache
    Memory Management Unit (MMU) in IU contains a 384-entry, dual-ported, three-way set associative Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB)
    ANSI/IEEE-754 standard floating-point coprocessor with imprecise interrupts
    32 double-word (64-bit) general-purpose registers in IU and 32 double-word (64-bit) floating-point registers in FPU
    128-bit data bus and a separate 40-bit address bus that can access up to 1 TB of physical memory
    Full compatibility with earlier 32-bit and 64-bit MIPS microprocessors
    Further Information
    SGI - MIPS R8000 (TFP) Microprocessor Chip Set
    R8000 press release
    Systems that use this processor
    POWER Indigo 2 <-- this is a small desktop workstation
    POWER Onyx <-- this is a bit bigger workstation
    POWER Challenge <-- a server



    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    MIPS R4000
    Brief Description
    The R4x00 processors have been available and used in different versions. PC (as in "R4000PC") denotes primary cache only and SC denotes secondary cache. The MC versions contain special support for cache architectures in multiprocessor systems. As all R4x00 series processors the R4000 is a 64bit processor and implements the MIPS III instruction set thus making the processor compatible to its predecessors. They contain 32 64bit integer registers and 32 64bit floating point registers, are superpiplined (8 stages) and approach an execution rate of one instruction per cycle. It also contains an onbaord MMU with a TLB (to provide rapid virtual to physical address translation) and contains an on-chip floating point unit. The R4000 contains an 8KB instruction and 8KB data cache for a total of 16KB of on-chip 1st level cache.

    Further Information
    Download MIPS R4000 Microprocessor User's Guide from techpubs.sgi.com
    Systems that use this processor
    Challenge S
    Challenge M
    Crimson
    Indigo
    Indigo 2
    Indy

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MIPS R10000
    Brief Description
    The MIPS R10000 ("T5"), which has been made avaiable in 1995, is the first 4-issue superscalar processor in the MIPS history. As the R8000, which has been released a year before, the R10000 implements the MIPS IV ISA and is a true 64bit processor, but in contrast to the R8000 the R10000 is a single chip processor. It includes 32 KB 1st level data and 32 KB 1st level instruction cache for a total of 64 KB on chip 1st level cache. The processor has 5 functional units that actually process the instruction: 2 integer units, 2 floating point units and 1 load/store unit. The pipeline length depends on the functional unit an instruction must pass. The pipeline length is 5 stages for integer, 6 for load/store and 7 for floating point instructions.

    Key Features
    ANDES Advanced Superscalar Architecture
    Supports four instructions per cycle
    Two integer and two floating-point execute instructions plus one load/store per cycle
    High-performance design
    3.3 volt technology
    Out-of-order instruction execution
    128-bit dedicated secondary cache data bus
    On-chip integer, FP, and address queues
    Five separate execution units
    MIPS IV instruction set architecture
    High Integration Chip-Set
    32 KB 2-way set associative, 2-way interleaved data cache with LRU replacement algorithm
    32 KB 2-way set associative instruction cache
    64 entry translation lookaside buffer
    Dedicated second level cache support
    Second Level Cache Support
    Dedicated 128-bit Data Bus
    Generation of all necessary SSRAM signals
    3.2 GB per second peak data transfer rate
    Programmable clock rate to SSRAM
    Compatible with Industry Standards
    ANSI/IEEE Standard 754-1985 for binary floating-point arithmetic
    MIPS III instruction set compatible
    Conforms to MESI cache consistency protocol
    IEEE Standard 1149.1/D6 boundary scan architecture
    Avalanche Bus System Interface
    Direct connect to SSRAM
    Split transaction support
    Programmable interface
    Further Information
    Download MIPS IV Instruction Set from techpubs.sgi.com
    Download MIPS R10000 Microprocessor User Guide, Version 2.0 from techpubs.sgi.com
    SGI - MIPS R10000 (T5) Superscalar Microprocessor
    The MIPS R10000 Superscalar Microprocessor
    Byte Magazine Nov/94: T5: Brute Force
    R10000 press release
    Systems that use this processor
    Indigo 2
    O2
    Octane
    Octane 2
    Onyx
    Onyx 2
    Challenge


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MIPS R12000
    Brief Description
    The architecture of the R12000 processor, that has been introduced in 1998, is very similar to the one used in the R10000 processors. Some characteristics of this processor:

    MIPS IV instruction set
    4-way superscalar 64-bit architecture
    Out-of-order instruction execution
    32KB instruction cache
    32KB data cache
    128-bit dedicated secondary cache bus
    5 separate execution units
    Further Information
    Byte Magazine Jan/98: RISC Fights Back with the Mips R12000
    Systems that use this processor
    O2
    O2+
    Octane 2
    Origin 3000


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MIPS R14000
    Brief Description
    Like the R12000 the R14000 CPU is an enhanced version of the R10000 architecture.

    Further Information
    Systems that use this processor
    Fuel
    Octane 2
    Origin 300
    Origin 3000


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MIPS R16000
    Brief Description
    Like the R12000 and R14000 the R16000 CPU is an enhanced version of the R10000 architecture.

    Product Description
    Four-way superscalar, 64-bit architecture
    Out-of-order instruction execution
    Five separate execution units
    MIPS IV instruction set
    32KB two-way set-associative on-chip instruction cache
    Further Information
    Systems that use this processor
    Fuel


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PMC-Sierra RM7000
    Brief Description
    SGI lists the following characteristics for the RM7000A processor in the O2+ product specifications:

    Dual-issue symmetric superscalar microprocessor with instruction prefetch
    MIPS®IV superset instruction set architecture
    Integrated primary and secondary caches
    16KB instruction, 16KB data, and 256KB on-chip secondary cache
    Per-line cache locking in primary and secondary cache
    Further Information
    Systems that use this processor
    O2+


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    General Ressources
    Microprocessor History
    Great Microprocessors of the Past and Present
    Unix and RISC, a New Hope
    RISC Refined: Berkeley RISC, Stanford MIPS . .
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  23. OMFG i am so techie illiterate that i haven't a clue as to the things you people are talking about.

    Don't get me wrong, i'd love to know and learn but just looking at all that makes my head hurt and my eyes bleed.

    Where can i go to get edumacated in this area (besides school, don't have $$$$ to spend in addition to the computer).

    If a man speaks in the middle of a forest and there is no woman around to hear him, is he still wrong?
    Quote Quote  
  24. Member holistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    here & there
    Search Comp PM
    chiapet , start here : http://www.google.com/ ... an excellent resource.

    Simply ask the question , then pick out the BS (this takes a little learning) to find relevent infomation.

    Example : What is mpeg2
    Returns --> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=What+is+mpeg2&btnG=Google+Search
    (this may vary - depending on the filter settings you have chosen in google.)
    From there i selected : http://www.mpeg2.de/ then http://www.mpeg2.de/doc/index.htm

    I got lucky there because I knew what i was looking for. The procedure is valid for most searches.

    ANOTHER ......... What is firewire .... returns : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=what+is+firewire
    Selecting : http://www.dvcentral.org/Firewire.html gives a good answer.

    The "trick" here is to read the supplied answer, THEN goto another site and compare. The problem with the internet ,compared to published works such as Encyclopędia Britannica is that there is no control over the content. My observations have come to the following conclusion : There is an excessive amount of plagiarism (hehe - type that into google) on the net. Couple that with people with no intrest/desire to follow up and confirm what they have copied and you end up with disinformation.

    The internet, local library and a good search engine has taught me volumes. I have learnt (self taught) all I know with those resources.
    Mind you ,as I said "take with a grain of salt" what you read on the web. Once backed up with a published article the content has credability.

    BELIEVE ME ............. OR NOT

    Point of note : There is an abundence af info on this site to confuse and amuse for weeks of reading. Just refer to the "how to - guides" ."other" section for media/player/software info
    Quote Quote  
  25. BJ_M your right
    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (June 7, 1994) -MIPS Technologies, Inc. today announced the world's fastest commercially available supercomputing microprocessor, the 64-bit RISC MIPS R8000 chip set. Specifically optimized for supercomputing
    If your referring to supercomputers... But who the hell has supercomputers on there desk at home or work?

    The Athlon 64 isn't the first 64-bit processor your right but it is the first x86-64 processor, meaning that it is able to run 32-bit and 64-bit code seamlessly. As far as dates go I wasn't talking about the Copyright.. Look at the date code. Also how do they copyright something that doesn't exist? Other than that I'm done argueing with you.
    Quote Quote  
  26. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by 808smokey
    BJ_M your right
    MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (June 7, 1994) -MIPS Technologies, Inc. today announced the world's fastest commercially available supercomputing microprocessor, the 64-bit RISC MIPS R8000 chip set. Specifically optimized for supercomputing
    If your referring to supercomputers... But who the hell has supercomputers on there desk at home or work?

    The Athlon 64 isn't the first 64-bit processor your right but it is the first x86-64 processor, meaning that it is able to run 32-bit and 64-bit code seamlessly. As far as dates go I wasn't talking about the Copyright.. Look at the date code. Also how do they copyright something that doesn't exist? Other than that I'm done argueing with you.
    if you read the info i posted above -- you will notice that they built several (many) desktop workstations with the same chip.. these were small workstations , but very powerfull (at the time) ..

    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  27. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Search Comp PM
    The best CPU?

    According to Tom's Hardware Guide:

    Summary: The P4 3.2 EE wins 32 times, the Athlon 64 FX-51 15 times - an uncertain 64-bit future for AMD
    Take a look http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030923/athlon_64-53.html
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!