VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Just out of curiosity, is there an advantage to using the earlier version for encoding? Just wondering as this is the version suggested by mizah in his menus tutorials. (Plus the Quicktime encoding plugin - QTReader.vfp - doesn't work for me in the earlier version. It does with 2.0.) Thanks.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Search PM
    What version gives you the best quality?
    Quote Quote  
  3. I'm going to find that out tonight!
    Quote Quote  
  4. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    I tested all, and my conclusions are:
    Beta 12: Small files, smoothness
    Beta 12H: Faster, with Sharpness,and great colours
    Blocks are the same on those 2 versions.

    Between 12 - 12H, quality is not that good. With versions 12i, 12j and 2.0, my templates give bad results. But 12J and 2.0 are faster
    Quote Quote  
  5. This is an interesting subject. Maybe some TMPEnc expert can clarify which version has best quality, which is fastest etc?


    "The answer's maybe and that's definite"

    Well Done - New Media Design
    Quote Quote  
  6. I'm more concerned with quality than speed. I know this much:
    TMPGEnc in either version is better than letting Nero do it or using AVI2VCD.
    I encoded some clips last night using 2.0 and am happy with the results.
    Quote Quote  
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!