I don't know if the speed of the USB port vs. the parallel port would really matter a whole lot. The ECP parallel spec calls for transmission speed of 2MBytes/sec. If you were transferring 320x240 in YUV format at 30 frames per second your transmission rate would be about 4.6MBytes/second. So, with at least 2.5:1 compression you are within the ECP spec (as long as your cable between the DVC and the computer is 12 feet or less).
As far as the resolution of the device is concerned, I am pretty sure this is set in the hardware. I have been considering building my own MPEG encoding card and from the research I have done it appears that the MPEG-1 compression chips over the last few year pretty much came with 320x240 resolution. The later chips that do MPEG-2 and MPEG-1 seem to come with higher resolutions.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1
Similar Threads
-
Two Quick Questions about Dazzle DVC 100
By Derangedyeti in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 17Last Post: 23rd Dec 2010, 22:46 -
Two Quick Questions about Dazzle DVC 100
By Derangedyeti in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 2nd Dec 2010, 22:04 -
Pinnacle Dazzle 'DVC 170' Woahs...
By synthecypher in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 3rd Jun 2010, 21:02 -
Dazzle DVC 90 Capturing
By LangleyM in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 19th Apr 2009, 09:42 -
Better than Dazzle DVC-170?
By bmbsa in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 5Last Post: 21st Sep 2008, 06:18