Who is going to win the 2006 World Cup? (NWS)

Well done Australia, just did enough. Plenty of controversy in that game. 3 red cards, and one after the player got 3 yellows And Australias equaliser was off side. Great game to watch though.

Originally Posted by G)-(OST

And Australias equaliser was off side. Great game to watch though.

and the first game that a player (babic) got 3 yellow cards???

I did mention that. English ref too

GO SOCCEROOS!!!

I like Australia's team, they are fierce like the White sharks that swim in their waters

Cheers for the brits, as we face each other on the next round.

May the best lads win!

See you on sunday!!!

GO ECUADOR!!!

Originally Posted by canadateck

Nobody Wants to say it..

jimmalenko you are A ******* *******............ I know I will Get a Card for IT. Or Worse.
Why dont you try Helping people and stop...Ratting on People.

Even your Avatar Looks like an *******.
You Offer Nothing...Other then your way (RAT) The Do Gooder).Get a ******* Life.


You are a LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh puh-lease ..... nothing to work with here

Originally Posted by G)-(OST

WHY IS MY IMAGE SHOWING AS A LINK??? MOD???

you need tou use the img tags, I fixed it for you

I voted for "I Don't Care", since I can't get behind a sport that even I can play (probably pro). By the same token, I'd rather play sports than watch.


Why the hate for jim? Seems like too many soccer hooligans in this thread. I thought we got rid of the non-work-safe stuff a while ago. While words aren't easily visible as swearing, naked women are easily noticable if someone walks by.

Why is someone berating jim's avatar when their own avatar looks like a child eating (drinking?) a bowl of urine?

Originally Posted by Supreme2k

Why the hate for jim?

It all seems to have stemmed from my comments that I don't "dig" soccer.

Originally Posted by Supreme2k

I thought we got rid of the non-work-safe stuff a while ago.

Me too. Here I was thinking this was a video forum

Originally Posted by Jeremiah58

It is obvious that jimmalenko has found out that reporting to the mods is better than sex:
https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1535967#1535967

He was just waiting, like a buzzard, for the opportunity.

Nah .... I treat all violations of Forum Rules equally

Originally Posted by Jeremiah58

Sure.
Specially those which you provoke.

You're entitled to your opinion.


I gave my opinion, which is just an opinion - grain of salt and all that - and is the 2nd most popular poll option, BTW, only to be told that I'm despised for my beliefs from the get-go. Some friendly banter ensued, and 'twas all quiet on my front for a few pages. Then came the topless pic. That violates my work's acceptable use of internet policy, and also the policy in regards to sexually-orientated material at this site. Not to mention that the first mod who saw the report joked about getting fired for viewing the pic at work.

Then I'm told I'm disrespecting my country because I couldn't give a bat's clacker about a particular sports event my country is represented in ? All I'll say is just remember about disrespecting your country when you're flicking thw TV and you come across a sports program showing your countrymen doing extreme ironing or some other "far-out" sport that you have no interest in. Now don't change the channel ! You're disrespecting your countrymen ! and me !

Sound ridiculous ? EXACTLY


Also, please allow me to give you a history lesson:

Let's not forget it's videohelp.com after all, and let's not forget a time before you were a regular here, when far more risque pics than that were in abundance. The mods & Baldrick could see things getting out of hand as people pushed and pushed the barriers of what's acceptable and what's not. At one point it was taboo in any other forum outside off-topic, and then off-topic became locked down behind a login policy due to the content and nature of both text and graphics. There were even two "prettiest woman" threads (one went 889 posts and the other was around 500 IIRC).

So please keep in mind that it was reported three times because the first mod said he'd take care of it when he got home from work. A day and a half later, no action, and hence a 2nd report. Then the 2nd mod didn't know what the report was referring to. Hence the 3rd report, and finally something as simple as a Not Work Safe warning was placed in the title. Again, back before your time this was considered etiquette for those who chose to browse at work.

So please don't railroad me for not getting "into" the World Cup, or for bringing something to the attention of the mods. There is method and reasoning.

Originally Posted by Jeremiah58

I will not give you the chance for another report.

Why do people care so much about who reports whom and for what ? There's rules here. Rules designed to give people guidelines on what is acceptable and what is not. Rules to prevent this site from getting shut down by places like the MPAA and/or RIAA. Rules that are in line with most common workplaces in regards to what is acceptable content. And so on. Mods enforce those rules. Mods can't be everywhere. There is a thread for bringing things to the attention of the mods. Most items are violations; some items are fine and need no action taken. Pardon me, but that one post I report may just prevent someone from getting fired at work, or from the site being taken down altogether.

Of course, should the cretins WHO BROKE THE RULES IN THE FIRST PLACE stick to the rules, then there's no need for reporting anything !

Originally Posted by canadateck

Topic not OK for Work? Then why are you here?? Day Off? Nice way to Spend it.

I can understand why you couldn't reach this conclusion all on your own , but just think about where in the world I am and what time it is for me now

I think you'll find it is after work for me and I'm doing some recreational browsing from the comfort of my own home, but thanks for your judgement and (lack of) input to the topic of the thread, anyhow