focus is primarly on the new ads av link but compare quality to ADV-100 and Dazzle with Laird Blueflame
http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/articles/adslink.htm
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
-
I wouldn't think these products would have such a difference between them. I'll just stick to using my DV camera as a pass-thru.
-
I am relatively a "newbie" in DVDHelp.
I have a digi8camcorder.
I have no video or audio problems when I capture files in "avi" format. However, when I capture directly as mpeg2, I obtain a metalic noise.
So, my short term solution is to keep capturing in "avi", since the convertion to DVD works just fine.
However, since my digi8 camcorder supports playing my
old analog 8mm tapes, when I "capture" (pass through, or however it does it) videos from
analog tapes, I get distored audio after 1 or 2
minutes of playback, even when I captured them as
"avi" files.
Have you experienced this problem, and what has been
your solution?
Rene -
My Hollywood Bridge by DAZZLE "Transcode from COMPOSITE" fares the worst in your chart- I always wondered why my NTSC pass thru monitor was so colorful ;-(
So, I'm using my TARGA when QUALITY is the ISSUE
When are they (ADS) coming out with USB 2.0 instant DVD ?
The current product is 1.1 only... -
I've been using my Sony DV bridge for a very long time and it works perfect, never any problems. Great device, of course my cousin gets the same thing from his camcorder now...
-
I capture analog thru my bt878 to dv.avi using IUVCR or virtualdub. I get different video attributes using MainConcept, Panasonic or Canopus Codecs and the 'best' (IMHO) using the directshow DV encoder to a type 1 avi. (Although that seemed to improve after installing Vegas Video 4 - does anyone know if the Sonic Foundry dv codec 'takes over' for M$?) Regardless, the resolution, noise and macroblocking all appear about the same. The difference to my eye appears to be the level of saturation, 'color correctness' and a warm or cool look to the capture. Just my 2 cents from experience.
-
the folks at various DV forums say the vegas DV codec is the very best .
the people at SoFo say thier codec mimics the MS dv codec file signiture.. but i dont think externally to Vegas the Vegas codec can be used ..
its not supposed to mater which codec is used for capturing , only for re-compression.
Similar Threads
-
newbee Hi8---analog to digital conversion ..plz help
By coloradocowboy in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 20th Jun 2011, 12:53 -
canopus ADVC-55 conversion analog to digital on MacPro
By morgankia in forum MacReplies: 3Last Post: 27th Oct 2009, 21:56 -
Conversion of .mov to .wmv takes too long w/ analog videos...
By Nintendo Fan in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 23rd Oct 2008, 15:47 -
Analog V8 to Digital conversion problem
By A2DMUG in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 25th Jul 2008, 02:01 -
Analog to digital conversion-no sound
By schiass in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 9th Aug 2007, 12:21