Anyone tried DVD2ONE?

[Bstansbury]

When I played the disk in PowerDVD I got no sound. My APEX1500 supports DTS audio, still no sound. I also tried it in Win XP Media Player, and no sound.

IF you've had success with DVD2one and DTS, what did you use to play it on your PC. Also, what do you use to burn and are there any special settings.

I erased my disk and tried it again just to verify I had not made any mistakes. No luck, it was still the same.

I really need to fine out what went wrong since I really need to burn these with DTS support.

[ninja_pimp]

just a lil feedback on this monster of a thread..
i use dvd2one since the 2nd day it was release in january and i've copied every sinlge movie so far.
not one single movie has passed me, 1.5hr tunraround for a copy. and every single copy has played perfect on several stand alone dvd players.

I swear by it.
my tools:
dvd dycrpter 3.14
dvd2one
record now max v4.12

with these 3 apps my dvd collection has grown 10 fold. with these 3 the movie hording industry is merciless. period.

[boss]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one? i did and it came out awful. the background always seems to be breaking up. sometimes it looks worse than a vcd! i don't know why it came out so bad. sure, it's a horror film with a lot of dark scenes, but it's only 1hr 40minutes long! woodstock was 2 hours longer and came out much better!

[Will Hay]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one...

No, but the dvd2one forum (www.dvd2one.com) now has a sticky for problem movies, might be worth you posting over there
Will

moved to its own thread ... see DVDBot

[Bstansbury]

Sorry for being so dumb about my post up above. I burned "peacemaker" using DTS audio and could not get the audio to play. Pretty stupid of me,.... I have Players that are DTS compatilble,... but,... DAhhhhhhhh,..... I don't have a Digital DTS amplifier,... and of course my "Digital Output" from my DVD players is not connected to anything,.... so I guess It would be really hard to hear the output.

I assume my disk is OK until I find someone that has a DTS amp and try it there. Sorry for posting such a dumb question,... but at least I learned something.

[defense]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one? i did and it came out awful. the background always seems to be breaking up. sometimes it looks worse than a vcd! i don't know why it came out so bad. sure, it's a horror film with a lot of dark scenes, but it's only 1hr 40minutes long! woodstock was 2 hours longer and came out much better!

Yep, just another dissatisfied customer! That's why I don't use this proggy to begin with..it's too unpredictable. The couple of tests I did on some full movies had studdering and pausing. I am POSITIVE there are other posters who have also experienced similar negative experiences, except they are too ashamed to report them because they were on the jock of this program like Deion Sanders on a shit receiver. They were quick to test one movie and say it was the greatest thing since the microwave, now they have disappeared with their heads up their arses and have realized this program needs MUCH improvement. If and when there are releases which will make this program work "CONSISTENTLY" with ALL movies, then that will be the time that this program will cost mo' $$$ mo' $$$ and mo' $$$$. Until that day comes, more people are going to be feeling like this " " while the others that start to actually watch their movies instead of trying to HOARD all their copies, will soon find out how many poor results they have and they will do this
" " and as far as i'm concerned, without that consistency, here's what I've done with this program " " and I can't wait for those turkeys to come back and report all of their negative experiences so I can do this " :biglaugha: " DVD2DVDR is THE most Consistent and THE BEST program for QUALITY for copies each and EVERY time. This is to DVD2DVDR " :tdown: " And this is to DVD2ONE " "

[john_630]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one? i did and it came out awful. the background always seems to be breaking up. sometimes it looks worse than a vcd! i don't know why it came out so bad. sure, it's a horror film with a lot of dark scenes, but it's only 1hr 40minutes long! woodstock was 2 hours longer and came out much better!

Yep, just another dissatisfied customer! That's why I don't use this proggy to begin with..it's too unpredictable. The couple of tests I did on some full movies had studdering and pausing. I am POSITIVE there are other posters who have also experienced similar negative experiences, except they are too ashamed to report them because they were on the jock of this program like Deion Sanders on a shit receiver. They were quick to test one movie and say it was the greatest thing since the microwave, now they have disappeared with their heads up their arses and have realized this program needs MUCH improvement. If and when there are releases which will make this program work "CONSISTENTLY" with ALL movies, then that will be the time that this program will cost mo' $$$ mo' $$$ and mo' $$$$. Until that day comes, more people are going to be feeling like this " " while the others that start to actually watch their movies instead of trying to HOARD all their copies, will soon find out how many poor results they have and they will do this
" " and as far as i'm concerned, without that consistency, here's what I've done with this program " " and I can't wait for those turkeys to come back and report all of their negative experiences so I can do this " :biglaugha: " DVD2DVDR is THE most Consistent and THE BEST program for QUALITY for copies each and EVERY time. This is to DVD2DVDR " :tdown: " And this is to DVD2ONE " "

Sorry defense,
but it does work.
Backed up Back To The Future 1-3 and it worked great.
Backed up ET and it was great.
I'll try "Tina Turner In Amsterdam" tomorrow.
It's only 113 min. But it's a very high bit rate 9000+.

[GandyMan]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one? i did and it came out awful. the background always seems to be breaking up. sometimes it looks worse than a vcd! i don't know why it came out so bad. sure, it's a horror film with a lot of dark scenes, but it's only 1hr 40minutes long! woodstock was 2 hours longer and came out much better!

Yep, just another dissatisfied customer! That's why I don't use this proggy to begin with..it's too unpredictable. The couple of tests I did on some full movies had studdering and pausing. I am POSITIVE there are other posters who have also experienced similar negative experiences, except they are too ashamed to report them because they were on the jock of this program like Deion Sanders on a shit receiver. They were quick to test one movie and say it was the greatest thing since the microwave, now they have disappeared with their heads up their arses and have realized this program needs MUCH improvement. If and when there are releases which will make this program work "CONSISTENTLY" with ALL movies, then that will be the time that this program will cost mo' $$$ mo' $$$ and mo' $$$$. Until that day comes, more people are going to be feeling like this " " while the others that start to actually watch their movies instead of trying to HOARD all their copies, will soon find out how many poor results they have and they will do this
" " and as far as i'm concerned, without that consistency, here's what I've done with this program " " and I can't wait for those turkeys to come back and report all of their negative experiences so I can do this " :biglaugha: " DVD2DVDR is THE most Consistent and THE BEST program for QUALITY for copies each and EVERY time. This is to DVD2DVDR " :tdown: " And this is to DVD2ONE " "

Yep and once again we Have to try the Movie and see for ourself what went wrong. So I did and what did I find out. Well do not know if he used NTSC or PAL, But Used the NTSC version and the Movie is only 3.7 Gig so it does nothing when u run it through DVD2ONE, it is already small enough to fit on one disk, So all DVD2ONE is going to do is Strip out onwanted crap. Went from 3.7 to 3.31 Gig no change in bitrate. So mabey it was pal he used or something. So anyway I would try it again and see if u did something wrong because if u have the NTSC does not change bitrate at all.

[Will Hay]

has anyone tried "dog soldiers" with dvd2one? i did and it came out awful. the background always seems to be breaking up. sometimes it looks worse than a vcd! i don't know why it came out so bad. sure, it's a horror film with a lot of dark scenes, but it's only 1hr 40minutes long! woodstock was 2 hours longer and came out much better!

Yep, just another dissatisfied customer! That's why I don't use this proggy to begin with..it's too unpredictable. The couple of tests I did on some full movies had studdering and pausing.....

Defense, don't ever stop posting man, everyone should read your posts first thing in a morning
I'm gonna' nominate you as a moderator, but that might be the end of my account!
I've never had a problem with dvd2one, but in addition to the freaks who love it after one successful attempt and then hide when it won't work anymore there's also the arses that post and post and post how crap it is, and *these* ar*sholes have only used it the once!
I have gone down the dvd2dvdr route and yes, it's superb and produces better results that dvd2one but some people have a 'balance', I can a forgoe a little quality to speed up the encoding time by so much, but that's just me.
Will

[aaron10]

What convoluted logic! Let's see, it goes like this..."If no one is posting DVD2ONE related problems here it's because they've encountered a ton of problems and are too ashamed to admit it". I doubt it! This is where folks would be posting problems and asking for advice.

Could it be that, by and large, the program does what it is intended to do. I have backed up 14 movies and haven't encountered any skips or pauses. Furthermore, I have backed up a 3 hour movie and the final product is more than acceptable. DVD2ONE may not work for every movie or for everyone but it has worked for many movies and for many people.

[defense]

Defense, don't ever stop posting man, everyone should read your posts first thing in a morning
I'm gonna' nominate you as a moderator, but that might be the end of my account!

lol...funny stuff. I'm glad you never had a problem, this is not bashing DVD2ONE, it is stating the facts. Do you think I wouldn't want a program that worked as fast and had the best possible quality? C'mon, of course I would. Hopefully Pinnacle Instant Copy 7 is the answer. Only time will tell.


aaron10 said:

What convoluted logic! Let's see, it goes like this..."If no one is posting DVD2ONE related problems here it's because they've encountered a ton of problems and are too ashamed to admit it". I doubt it! This is where folks would be posting problems and asking for advice.

Could it be that, by and large, the program does what it is intended to do. I have backed up 14 movies and haven't encountered any skips or pauses. Furthermore, I have backed up a 3 hour movie and the final product is more than acceptable. DVD2ONE may not work for every movie or for everyone but it has worked for many movies and for many people.

Convoluted Logic? Tell me your cat typed that. I don't see where there is logic when COUNTLESS people have posted about QUALITY AND PIXELATION issues when using this program. There is NO logic there buddy. Also, check out EVERY page of this thread, read ALL the results, then check out EVERY page of the DVD2DVDR thread and read those results. Find out how many people have used DVD2DVDR and had "PIXELATION" or "Quality" issues after making a copy, then come back and report what you've read.

The problem is that the majority of the people don't have the desire to want to learn, or just can't learn, and are looking for the easiest way to make copies. Unfortunately, there isn't ALWAYS an easy way to do things. I never said this program DOES NOT work, read my posts. I have even tested it out. I said the program is NOT consistent, and there are KNOWN issues with it.

Hopefully they will be resolved with further releases, and hopefully this DVD BOT will help as well.

And as far as having other posters who would come back to ask questions after jockin' the product without even testing it, well, that is just not the case. I'm man enough to admit when i'm wrong, but A LOT of people aren't. I remember on the DVD2DVDR thread, when people couldn't figure out how to install the program because it's in German, and it was very simple to get it to install, once you figured out you had to click on the computer icon, and not a button.


Well, after all the people figured out what the problem was, not ONE of them came back and said how they got it to install, because they were ashamed to admit how easy it was and that they only had to click the computer icon. There are many other examples, but that is just one. Maybe those other posters in hiding will come back under new nics and post their problems.

As far as Quality goes, actually, I'm hoping Instant Copy 7 is all what it appears to be, because if that is the case, it will take about the same time as DVD2DVDR, but the Quality will be the same EACH TIME, and people could have subtitles, extra audio tracks, AND MENU's, which would put this product to rest for most.

[ghoster]

wow i cin't believe poeple couldn't get dvd2dvr install. i guess i give people to much credit. thats some funny stuff. why do they own a computer then if they can't figure out how to install that program, lol. come on folks...

[defense]

wow i cin't believe poeple couldn't get dvd2dvr install. i guess i give people to much credit. thats some funny stuff. why do they own a computer then if they can't figure out how to install that program, lol. come on folks...

Ghoster, in all seriousness, that wasn't a really intelligent comment. If you read the thread, then of course it would be easy to install the program, because people like myself, eventually figured out what the problem was and actually "posted" the reason for having problems trying to get it to install.

The program's installation was all in German, because Chat Walker, the program's author, is German. Therefore, if you didn't speak German, you had NO CLUE what it was saying when you tried to install it. You eventually got to a screen with two buttons, from most people's experience with previous program's it would seem obvious that you would hit one of the two buttons to continue the installation, and the other button to exit. However, that logic was NOT valid for this program, as BOTH of the buttons would cause errors with the installation.

What needed to be done was to simply click on the big computer icon at the top of the screen. But it wasn't as obvious as it seemed, because it didn't appear that clicking on that icon would do anything, and again, using logic, what were those two buttons for anyway. Bottom line is that if you are trying to do something, run something, install something, and the application is in a foreign language, it's very easy to get perplexed. As I said, it would be "easy" for ANYONE to install the program, AFTER reading the thread, because it tells you right there what needs to be done.

And one last thing, as far as giving people too much credit, if you still can't understand after reading this, why it would be confusing to install that app, then I'd be glad to scroll through some of those 385 posts of yours, and see where people gave you too much credit for something that was brain dead simple.

[musher70]

well, ok, im sure people have issues with this little proggie
again, some cant help but to bomb folks who only paid $40
For 94kbs, but hey whatever, ive done 20-30 discs now,and
some problems arise, just like re-encoding, but whatever,
here's an issue i've never encountered before, while using
dvd workshop, it created a folder that came out to 4.4g but
didnt recode it for some reason, so i used dvd2one, and it
made it to 4.36g made me happy i ddint have to re-capture,
just a thought...

[madrockr]

Well, I bought this program and tried my first movie. It looked really great and I was very suprised at the quality, until the last few chapters of the movie. The movies starting freezing with a lot of artifacts. I do have to say that this movies was 180 minutes, maybe it was just to long a movie to work well with this program. I am going to try another movies and see what happens. I was satisfied until the last 20 minutes of the movie.

[GandyMan]

Well, I bought this program and tried my first movie. It looked really great and I was very suprised at the quality, until the last few chapters of the movie. The movies starting freezing with a lot of artifacts. I do have to say that this movies was 180 minutes, maybe it was just to long a movie to work well with this program. I am going to try another movies and see what happens. I was satisfied until the last 20 minutes of the movie.

It is not the program, it is something with your disk or software, if u play it on your computer i am sure it will work. I am not talking about the Burnt DVD just try playing the outputted files and see if they mess up if not the out putted files are good. But with all software thier are bugs, and I could be wrong. Alot of people are having problems with the last few chapters of movies and it has turned out to be something else. Hope this helps if not, I'd give the new InstantCopy a try, so far turning out to be a great program, better quality and adds about an hour to your time that is it. I love DVD2ONE but with no updates comming, goto be on the look out for the next best thing.

[aaron10]

Convoluted Logic? Tell me your cat typed that. I don't see where there is logic when COUNTLESS people have posted about QUALITY AND PIXELATION issues when using this program.

My cat is smart enough to notice the convoluted logic...yes.

Countless people? I thought we were talking facts here! A search for pixelation on this forum produced 37 hits. Countless? Of those 37, only 4 of them were people saying they actually had pixelation ISSUES. Some said they noticed a bit of pixelation in dark areas if the screen was scrutinized -- but they were happy with the overall quality. Most of the posts were of a jocular nature, suggesting "if I stand within an inch of the television and watch the dark areas intently I notice a random pixel or two". Your post was the longest winded diatribe bemoaning the horrible quality of DVD2ONE.

You are correct when you say...

I don't see where there is logic when COUNTLESS people have posted about QUALITY AND PIXELATION issues when using this program. There is NO logic there buddy.

There is no logic there because COUNTLESS people have NOT created posts suggesting they are disatisfied with the results due to pixelation.

I think GandyMan has hit it on the head. There are several variables at issue when DVD2ONE is used. The ripping software, the media, the DVD player, the burning software/process, and the operator. If you burn using UDF 1.5 (as some burning software now has set as the default), you're going to get jerky output with a lot of scrambling or the output won't play at all. If you use something as simple (and free) as Imgtools Ver 0.99.9 (enabling UDF and ISO 9600 in the settings--and that's all--and "Reallocate VIDEO_TS Structure" and "Enable DVD R+/-R/RW Compatibility Mode" on the interface) you will get almost universally compatible output. I successfully tested the material on 2 Samsungs, 2 JVC's, 3 Panasonics, 2 Apex's, 2 Sony's, 1 Imiation (spelling?), and a Magnavox. The material did not work on either of 2 Zenith's that I tested. The literature did not suggest that they could play DVD-R's, however.

DVD2ONE isn't sliced bread but it does okay...

[defense]

@ Aaron10, two things. One, I found seven people that have complained about pixelation. I don't see it as a jocular nature, when the took the time to complain about it. Second, you are taking what I've said out of context, like many others.

I have this program, and have had it since the first day. I don't use it, because I personally am skeptikal from my tests, as well as all the posts i've read. People want an INSTANT, EASY backup method to be perfect, and all I've said is that this method is FAR from perfect, but I HAVE

ALWAYS said that it appears to be ACCEPTIBLE. AT least for many. As far as the other methods and variables you mentioned. I won't even go into those, because on ALL of my backups with DVD2DVDR and CCE, the majority have been all the same program, and the burns have mainly been with RecordNow Max. I have NOT had ANY of the issues with the 50 or so burns I've done with those methods due to the programs. However, using DVD2ONE I got a little bit of studdering and instantaneous freezing every ten minutes or so on a couple of movies, but the quality was good.

The studdering was rapid, but noticeable. Other people have noticed THAT problem as well. I backed the same movies up using DVD2DVDR and CCE, and guess what? No problems as usual. One last thing to mention is that I asked you to also check out the DVD2DVDR LONG thread and report how many people have complained even in a "JOCULAR" nature about pixelation or quality issues with DVD2DVDR, but I didn't hear your response. So I will answer that question for you. ZERO! That must mean something. But one thing I will agree with you on and that I have said all along:

DVD2ONE isn't sliced bread but it does okay...

Okay being the key word there.

[alenhard]

Okay so I guess SEVEN people complaining can now be considered as being COUNTLESS.

Funny that your name is DEFENSE when all you really do is OFFEND people.

As if there haven't been lots of other problems with DVD2DVDR?

Congratulations Defense! You have successfully hijacked another forum topic and ruined it with your senseless arguments!

[aaron10]

This will be my last post in this vein, since it's obvious that you're now obfuscating and backtracking, Defense...

First, I'm not sure how you came up with your count of 7, but (irregardless) 7 hardly deserves the moniker "countless".

Second, I took nothing out of context. If you read your pompous, first message on page 16, you'll see you didn't say anything even remotely close to DVD2ONE is "okay," as you now intimate that you did.

Third, you seem to be suggesting (no, more like saying it outright) that everyone who has had success with DVD2ONE is either too cognitively challenged to understand quality or too stupid to realize that all of their movies are unplayable. I doubt either of these possibilities is the case.

I didn't bother going to the DVD2DVDR forum because I have no argument with DVD2DVDR. My line of argumentation rests solely on your arrogant, illogical assessment of DVD2ONE. If you can't get it to work but a boat load of folks can...maybe the brunt of the problem lies with you (as operator or as uncompromising bastion of the asthetic) and not DVD2ONE.

[JasonK]

Defense,

Yep, just another dissatisfied customer! That's why I don't use this proggy to begin with..it's too unpredictable. The couple of tests I did on some full movies had studdering and pausing. I am POSITIVE there are other posters who have also experienced similar negative experiences, except they are too ashamed to report them because they were on the jock of this program like Deion Sanders on a shit receiver. They were quick to test one movie and say it was the greatest thing since the microwave, now they have disappeared with their heads up their arses and have realized this program needs MUCH improvement. If and when there are releases which will make this program work "CONSISTENTLY" with ALL movies, then that will be the time that this program will cost mo' $$$ mo' $$$ and mo' $$$$. Until that day comes, more people are going to be feeling like this " " while the others that start to actually watch their movies instead of trying to HOARD all their copies, will soon find out how many poor results they have and they will do this
" " and as far as i'm concerned, without that consistency, here's what I've done with this program " " and I can't wait for those turkeys to come back and report all of their negative experiences so I can do this " :biglaugha: " DVD2DVDR is THE most Consistent and THE BEST program for QUALITY for copies each and EVERY time. This is to DVD2DVDR " :tdown: " And this is to DVD2ONE " "

LOL! That's the funniest thing I've seen posted recently, yet so true.

I am POSITIVE there are other posters who have also experienced similar negative experiences, except they are too ashamed to report them because they were on the jock of this program like Deion Sanders on a shit receiver. They were quick to test one movie and say it was the greatest thing since the microwave, now they have disappeared with their heads up their arses and have realized this program needs MUCH improvement

LOL! I couldn't agree more!!! Many of those same users were giving me shit when I was trying to bring awareness to the sacrifices in quality that the DVD2ONE users were making several weeks ago. Of course, I knew it was only a matter of time before they would see the light of day... or should I say the pixelization and artifacting? Have a good time making new backups of all your movies!

And for all those early DVD2ONE adopters who were giving me shit, this one's for you:

And this:

[aaron10]

I love the schoolgirl nature of your posts, guys. The profusion of icons smacks of the intellectually gifted.

Now, I note that you, JasonK, have not posted in this forum, relating your keen observations about DVD2ONE. Your words of wisdom were penned in different forums, right?

I see your advice, such as this very recent post....

WRONG! I've never said anyone was an idiot for using DVD2one. In fact, if you had read most of my posts lately, you will see I said it was a good idea for newbies, lazy people, people who don't have good quality equipment, people who aren't as particular about quality, or people who have difficulty understanding the more technical methods such as with CCE.

Or in this recent post...

Now wake up out of your dream world regarding how you would hope my life is and come back to reality. Like I said, you can do it YOUR way, but it's been proven time and time again to be lower quality. If you're satisfied with it, then be my guest. But us videophiles rather put in a little extra effort to produce an indistinguishable copy.

And, yes, I see you and Defense high-fivin' each other in various forums, offering your grammatically challeneged, self-serving ego boosts...

Instant Copy...it sounds like a fair alternative to CCE in some situations as defense has pointed out.

But to the heart of the matter... No one here said the results of all of their DVD2ONE work is terrible, as you have just stated.

Of course, I knew it was only a matter of time before they would see the light of day... or should I say the pixelization and artifacting? Have a good time making new backups of all your movies!

Instead, someone had a problem and Defense replied to the problem by suggesting everyone who uses DVD2ONE is either too simple to realize that all of their backups are bad or is too ashamed to admit it. And now, out of the blue, you show up to agree with him about something that never transpired.

This reminds me of a movie I successfully backed up with DVD2ONE. Ah yes, Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels were the main characters. Hmmm...Now what was the name of that movie...?

[bbeiler]

Wow, "DVD2ONE". Is this program awesome or what? I just found out about it 2 days ago. (I have been away from the forums for awhile). Boy, have I missed a lot. Judging by what I have read so far, as long as DVD Decrypter is used (file mode), then DVD2ONE, and burnt with RecordNow max; all is good. Yes, I am one of the people who have only done one movie and am ready to make a conclusion. So my conclusion comes with a reserve. If this program works on other movies the way it did for my first one, then I would have to say that it IS the best thing since sliced bread. . My one movie was Godzilla (2 hrs. 13) and it looked every bit as good, if not better, then my CCE version. I watched the entire movie from start to finish.

I really don't think we should be comparing the use of this program with the original DVD, but rather with other conventional methods of fitting a DVD-9 disc onto ONE DVD-5. ANY method will "loose quality" I have been using DVD2SVCD (CCE) then using DVDMaestro to put it together.

I am really hoping DVD2ONE does work as well on my future movies. Judging by what I have read, using DVD Decrypter (file mode), and burning with RecordNow should ensure success. I also use Ritek media, which I have heard also produces positive results.

I have one more thing to add, before the stones begin to be thrown , because of my VIRGIN experience with this program. History has lead me to believe that people are very likely to defend ANYTHING in which they have greatly invested their money and their time. I am NO exception. I have spent quite a bit of time educating myself (along with many others), by the use of this forum, to have the means to successfully backup a movie with correctly synced sound and subs. It is no easy task, and it involves quite a bit of time. To have all those efforts quickly trounced by a program that any idiot can quickly learn to use; is quite difficult to swallow.

I think those of you who have found errors with this program, need to revisit what this program is for, and how these errors came about. Was it used in file mode and then burnt with Recordnow? If it was and problems are still there. Then I think the only intelligent thing to do, is to wish for future upgrades to fix any problem it has. Rather than bash the program because it has humbled all of our conventional methods, and has put our pride to the test. If this program does give me a problem with a movie, then I will just use my old method for that movie and try again for the next one.

I know I will be ridiculed for posting this, because of only doing one movie. And I should be . However, I believe in the saying,"A million people can't be wrong" In this case, 90% of the people on this forum, and I'm one for one.

I will keep you all posted on my success. I don't plan on batting a thousand on my next 30 attempts, but I would be willing to bet 25 out of 30 is a safe bet.

Cheers

[alenhard]

I propose a new poll to see who everyone thinks is the biggest blowhard in these forums.

But how will they break the tie between Defense and JasonK?

P.S. JasonK where've you been? We used to have such sweet things to say to each other!

[defense]

aaron 10 said:

First, I'm not sure how you came up with your count of 7, but (irregardless) 7 hardly deserves the moniker "countless".

It was very difficult, I counted.

Second, I took nothing out of context. If you read your pompous, first message on page 16

This is page 16, and my first post on this topic was on the first few pages. Actually TRY and read posts in their entirety one day, instead of referring to your dictionary next to your hoarded DVD2ONE artifacting collection for "grammatical assistance." Speaking of which Grammer Genius, it is of poor articulation to use the word "IRRegardless." Most dictionaries don't even have that word listed, and the ones that do will tell you that it is NOT accpeted and you should use "REGARDLESS" instead.

Next time you try and articulate yourself, I suggest using "irrespetive" instead. IRRespective, IS in all dictionaries, unless of course you want to "monicker" it.


People like you and "alanhard" who consider this "bashing" live in a place called la' la' land.

You don't want to hear the truth about DVD2ONE because you got suckered into buying software that produces pixelation and artifacts. Now, within a week or so later, Instant Copy 7 is released, and it's going to put this program to sleep for good. You don't want to hear that either. Get out of la' la' land, and realize that I've ONLY stated merely the facts on this thread. Taking what I said out of context again, regarding people that are incompetent is pretty sad on your pard. I said that there are CLEARLY people here who want an easy alternative in making copies, and they will state opinions, and NOT FACTS, to help them justify their decision.

alanhard said:

Okay so I guess SEVEN people complaining can now be considered as being COUNTLESS.

Funny that your name is DEFENSE when all you really do is OFFEND people.

As if there haven't been lots of other problems with DVD2DVDR?

Congratulations Defense! You have successfully hijacked another forum topic and ruined it with your senseless arguments!

I OFFENDED people? I was the one that got jumped on for stating the facts. I didn't say ONE thing that should be taken to OFFEND anyone. If I offended you Alan, i'm sorry you are mentally weak. I've hijacked this post huh? lol..what other posts have I hijacked Alan, since you said "another" in your statement. The only ones that got "jacked" were you and the others who purchased this program and are now starting to realize the Facts, "ARTIFACTS" that is.

[alenhard]

Oh boy that was great! But hurry and edit your last post and fix all of your spelling mistakes!

And you called ME mentally weak? Hey guys, it's spelling bee time!

By the way, how do you "articulate yourself"? It isn't a reflexive verb- but nice effort.

And you may want to reconsider some of your sentence structures- you've got a few run-ons going on there.

Your defense is scattered at best. Better call a time out and get your game plan together. Knocking someone else's grammar obviously isn't scoring you any points!

Good luck!

[defense]

Alensoft, this isn't a grammar forum, and I don't spend time worrying about run-on sentences or correct spelling when I type. I see that "grammer" I spelled with an "e" and I happened to notice that after I sent it, but it wasn't important enough for me to edit. Only a real loser would look up every word in question in order to make themselves seem a Harvard English Professor. You waste your time with infinitesimal things as this, which just shows your character.

The bottom line is that aaron10 feels the need to make an ATTEMPT to articulate himself, but uses words which aren't even in the dictionary. You, on the other hand, use very simple words, because you don't know any others. By the way Alan, since you are so scrutinizing, here is one of your lasts posts.

Okay so I guess SEVEN people complaining can now be considered as being COUNTLESS.

Funny that your name is DEFENSE when all you really do is OFFEND people.

As if there haven't been lots of other problems with DVD2DVDR?

Congratulations Defense! You have successfully hijacked another forum topic and ruined it with your senseless arguments!

First, it isn't appropriate to start a sentence with "OKAY." Next, if you are going to write a sentence beginning with the word "OKAY", do so with an indentation. Lastly, this is a "STATEMENT"

As if there haven't been lots of other problems with DVD2DVDR?

Let me help you put that into question form. Haven't there been many other problems with DVD2DVDR? You make yourself look worse every post Alan. Try to stick to the topic alansoft, and I wonder how many dictionaries your buddy aaron10 is looking through right now.

[alenhard]

Another good effort, but you dropped the ball again. Let's remember- it was you who turned this into a grammar forum in the first place. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.

I guess you are right:

"Only a real loser would look up every word in question in order to make themselves seem a Harvard English Professor. You waste your time with infinitesimal things as this, which just shows your character."

You've now made multiple posts in which you have criticized someone's grammar. So what does that make you, then? Remember- you said it, not me!

And since you mentioned it, yes, I do speak clearly and simply. Guess it isn't me that's trying to sound like a Harvard English professor! (But just so you know- "professor" in this case is not capitalized- only when used as a title.)

I'd have to say you're still scoreless buddy!

By the way- DVD2ONE rocks! HA!

[JasonK]

Now, I note that you, JasonK, have not posted in this forum, relating your keen observations about DVD2ONE. Your words of wisdom were penned in different forums, right?

And specifically, THIS forum. As a matter of fact, even in this thread. Go back to the first pages of this thread where I was posting my negative opinions about DVD2ONE within a couple days after it was first discussed here.

But to the heart of the matter... No one here said the results of all of their DVD2ONE work is terrible, as you have just stated

For the reasons already stated. They are too ashamed to admit it after having already invested their money, or they aren't that particular about quality, or they don't have good quality equipment for viewing the video, etc... as I was saying weeks ago. But I have noticed more people admitting to the quality loss and looking for alternatives such as InstantCopy.

And now, out of the blue, you show up to agree with him about something that never transpired.

Out of the blue??! LOL!!! I've been posting to this thread since the second page, and have been making these comments about DVD2ONE all along... in this thread and some others. Sorry, I'm not going to link to all of them, but you can feel free to do searches all day long since you seem to enjoy that.

P.S. JasonK where've you been? We used to have such sweet things to say to each other!

I have better things to do than hang out on here every day. And I'm certainly not going to waste my time doing searches for other people's posts, playing English teacher, and complaining about people using emoticons.