Do you tell the difference between the fast (low quality), normal, or slow (high quality) when I encode the .mpg file which was captured at 352x480 from VHS tape? I have lost 14 frames size when capturing at 1 hrs 25 mins. I would like to convert into DVD-720X480. TMPGenc will run much longer if I use the high quality so will normal or low quality hurt the quality of video after encoding?
Would like to hear your input.
Thanks and am looking forward burning my first DVD since I bought the A105 DVD drive. :D
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Yes, there is a noticable difference. High quality is probably what you want to use most of the time.
You also might want to consider leaving your video at 352x480 for DVD, as I recall this is a valid NTSC resolution. Resizing it to 720x480 won't make it look any better and will make the encode take longer. -
Thats correct what sterno posted, just make sure the audio is @ 48 kHz sampled.
Similar Threads
-
Diamond Search for motion estimation
By bijo911 in forum ProgrammingReplies: 2Last Post: 10th May 2011, 18:26 -
best motion search option to increase encoding speed while keeping quality?
By visualhippocracy in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 13th Jan 2011, 10:40 -
Divx Bitrate Adjustment - Low Motion or High Motion? TmpgEnc Xpress 4
By Sliztzan in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 31st Aug 2008, 20:11 -
Philips DVP 5982 Time Search Question
By TufrThanu in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 5Last Post: 18th Oct 2007, 15:05 -
Is it possible to 'Time search' through Divx files on Philips 5960?
By Kibz25 in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 3Last Post: 3rd Aug 2007, 10:15