in terms of quality, on pc and/or tv screen, which is best, svcd or xvcd? or maybe i should say what are the advantages of each format? if you had the choice of an xvcd with higher bitrates, like 3000 or a standard svcd, which would you choose?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
Depends on the quality of the source file.
if it was a dvd rip i would go with the SVCD b/c of the higher resolution.
if it was mid quality capture i woudl look into the xvcd method. -
I think it really is 50/50. SVCD has a higher resolution therefore a sharper, clearer picture, but needs a higher bitrate to avoid macroblocks.
SVCD = 480 * 480 (NTSC) = 230,400
XVCD = 352 * 240 (NTSC) = 84,480
As you can see, XVCD has only 36.6% of the pixels that SVCD has.
So an XVCD at say 1500Kb/sec has the same bits per pixel as a SVCD at 4080Kb/sec! This is purely comparing bits per pixel.
I personally use XVCD for downloaded .avi files and CVD for DVD rips. CVD uses a resolution of 352 * 480. It's kind of half way between VCD and SVCD but gives great quality because the vertical resolution is really what gives the picture it's quality.
Check out http://www.vcdhelp.com/forum/userguides/98177.php for more info on CVD.
If your watching the film on a TV up to about 28-29" then XVCD will do fine. But give CVD a go. Try it with DVD2SVCD for ease of use. You'll be glad you did (IMHO of course).
Cheers.
GGSEat! Drink! Be merry! Tomorrow we snuff it! - (Sid James, from 'Hancock's Half Hour') -
I use a resolution of 720x480 for all my XVCD and XSVCD. Given the same encodeing parameters I doubt anyone could tell the difference between XVCD and XSVCD.
Similar Threads
-
Help with PAL SVCD to NTSC SVCD
By silentmonolith in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 6th Jul 2007, 06:18