VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    What can I do to speed up my encoding speed?
    Quote Quote  
  2. faster processor or less filters

    Hope this helps
    VCD4ME
    We were all NEWBIES once and the only stupid question is the one that's not asked?
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member holistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    here & there
    Search Comp PM
    Yup what vcd4me said ... faster CPU ... maybe more RAM

    and only POSTING ONCE helps .
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    Where can I buy extra RAM, holistic? Would buying FlashMemory and Memory Sticks help? Can you tell me all the hardware (memory, etc.) that I would need to buy in order to make my encoding speed much faster?

    Thanks holistic and vcd4me!!!
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member holistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    here & there
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by puertorican138
    Would buying FlashMemory and Memory Sticks help? Can you tell me all the hardware (memory, etc.) that I would need to buy in order to make my encoding speed much faster?
    You are joking right ?! I was almost ready to say buy 128Mb Flash Memory and get you to load it through your CD rom drive but i will give you a freebee.

    The following info is required : Motherboard manufacturer / model

    From that i can tell what type of memory you will require : EDO, PC100, PC133, DDR, Rambus ......
    Quote Quote  
  6. Get the Tmpgenc 2.54a and enable "Saving result from first pass" under Env. setting--CPU (If you are using Tmpgenc and doing 2-pass VBR). It will be 30% faster.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Hate to say this, but the rest of the people are right. The faster the cpu, the faster the encoding times.

    John

    http://www.vcdhelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=93901&highlight=
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    Motherboard: Intel(R) Celeron Processor
    Model: Intel(R) 810
    Windows Version: Windows 98 Second Edition
    Quote Quote  
  9. Pentium Celerons are not good for video get a P4 or Athlon XP.
    Quote Quote  
  10. get your PC hooked on crack or crystal meth.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member holistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    here & there
    Search Comp PM
    The 810 chipset takes either PC66 or PC100 SDRAM

    Goodluck finding these at a good price. Suggest 256Mb of PC133 (it will only run at 100 though - or whatever your board supports)

    The is the option to overclock but i doubt you will have any success with a $ihtty generic board.

    CELERONS ARE OK for video if you are patient and don't expect instant encodes.

    Ideally a dual CPU setup is optimal, but for a hobby, lets be reallistic here a celeron will do the job.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Originally Posted by holistic
    The 810 chipset takes either PC66 or PC100 SDRAM

    Goodluck finding these at a good price. Suggest 256Mb of PC133 (it will only run at 100 though - or whatever your board supports)

    The is the option to overclock but i doubt you will have any success with a $ihtty generic board.

    CELERONS ARE OK for video if you are patient and don't expect instant encodes.

    Ideally a dual CPU setup is optimal, but for a hobby, lets be reallistic here a celeron will do the job.

    For what it's worth Puertorican, I have an intel 810 chipset too. It's actually an 810e that can (allegedly) run at 133 MHZ FSB. Trying this will have DISASTEROUS effects though. If anyone has done this, let me know. Mine is running well at 100MHZ but I had to disable the L2 cache. It's faster this way. As far as captures go, just try with what you have dude. There's folks here that report caps with no frame drops with "SLOW" computers like ours. Just remember, it may take you forever to convertn though.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    Yeah, it does take a long time to convert. It took me 24 hours and 13 minutes just to convert a 70 minute movie!!!
    Quote Quote  
  14. Originally Posted by puertorican138
    Yeah, it does take a long time to convert. It took me 24 hours and 13 minutes just to convert a 70 minute movie!!!
    Wow, did you overclock your motherboard? Do you have any trouble capturing with the integrated audio and video? I am very interested in hearing other folks using i810 to cap.
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    Good thing you have an Intel 810!!! What does overclocking your motherboard mean? I don't have a capture card.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by puertorican138
    Motherboard: Intel(R) Celeron Processor
    Model: Intel(R) 810
    Windows Version: Windows 98 Second Edition
    What is the speed of your processor? This is very important. BUT reading that it takes 24 hrs to encode a movie means you got something less then a 500 .. cause I had a P3 500 with 256 MB RAM and it took 14 hrs. My solution was buy a new CPU (processor and motherboard) .. now I have an Athlon 1800 XP and it takes me 45 min or so.. huge difference. Hope this makes sense to you.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    United States of America
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks man.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    45 min???!!??

    I have an XP 1800, 1GB DDR RAM, 7200 RPM drive, and it takes me 7 hours to encode a regular movie at the highest motion search quality.

    Is there something wrong here?

    Andy
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Hello all,

    Yeah, he didn't say:
    * length of movie he was basing that on
    * what resolution he encoded to ie, 352x240, 480x480, etc.
    * used any filters, etc.
    * anything else I left off, just add to this list

    my guess, is he was talking about makde standard VCDs not SVCDs.
    I have an XP 1700 and XP 1800, but Never got that on ANY kind of
    encode, be it 60min to 90 minutes!

    So, take those statements w/ a grain of sand

    -vhelp
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    thanks, here I was remembering all the late nights thinking I had a setting wrong.

    Andy
    Quote Quote  
  21. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Sorry I wasnt more specific ..

    Im encoding a 1hr:20 min avi movie to mpg format at a 352x240 resolution standard VCD. It takes me 45 min to 1hr to do this.. I dont use any filters or anything cause I dont know how, thats why Im here in the Newbie Conversion forum
    Quote Quote  
  22. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    yeah, when I do an MPEG-2 720x480 2 hours long CBR, it takes between 7-12 hours at the highest motion quality.

    Andy
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    Ah, now we're talking straight, he, he...

    Thanks for clearing that up for the others here, wingfan.

    I'll have to post my encoding times too, when I get things straighten
    out w/ my VCR. I'm in the middle of figuring out an issue at the moment,
    and I don't want to start, unless I have to.

    anyways, for what't it's worth, in reference to the originator of this thread,
    my encoding speeds for an 1 hour capture of Star Trek Voyager on my
    old 900Mhz T-Brd was:
    * 352x480 xSVCD
    * minus commercials via vdub
    * minor filtering (sharp/deinterlace w/ blend)
    * 29fps
    * encoding multi segmented clips (used as chapters)
    * 3 hours or less.

    As far as increasing encoding times, that all depends on your source and
    what your goal is, in quality:
    * don't use any filtering, but if you must, use defaults, and not high values.
    * minimise the use of too many frameserving mechanism's, ie, using
    AVS scrips, and feeding it into vdub, then feedng into tmpg
    * try your hand at CQ vs. 2pass, and save 1/2 the encoding right their.

    Good luck.
    -vhelp
    Quote Quote  
  24. Guest
    Motherboard - FIC VA503+
    CPU - AMD K6-2 500mhz
    Memory - 320 meg
    HD #1 - Westerndigital 7200rpm 40gig
    HD #2 - Westerndigital 5400rpm 6.4gig

    Encoding times: 1 hour 40 minute movie = 7.5 hours.
    Template - Standard VCD 352x240 TMPGEnc.

    HOWEVER:
    While using one of Kwags templates, I believe it was the 704x480
    1CD template it took me 31 hours to encode. Needless to say I really
    did not like that (Wear and tear on the system) so I just encode with
    one of his smaller templates and change the fps to match what my
    DVD player can handle, 29.97 fps. I did this to one of his templates
    and it only took 6.5 hours.

    Good Luck.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!