hi client has asked me for a pro res file and an mp4 version too from a betacam sp tape
my normal workflow is capture via my advc 100 as an AVI (windows xp). and then convert to mp4 with tmpgenc 7
is there any benefit for the client to have a prores version since i could be wrong but the avi i produce at 12gb an hour plus a decent extra conversion to mp4 sounds quality enough in my humble view.
would appreciate your opinion
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 32
Thread
-
-
Have you told them your view, and your workflow?
Scott -
make video everyday
-
-
Sorry, I'm trying to say this without any judgement or offense, and understanding that I am a professional, but rarely do conversion myself anymore, if I approached you and wanted work, but found you used DV as a digitzation vehicle, and didn't even describe your workflow, or know in detail about the benefits of digital near-lossless intermediates like prores, I would certainly take my business elsewhere.
Would you use a plumber that didn't understand U-joints and still wanted to use lead pipes?
Scott -
Anyway, what's wrong with a DV workflow? It's the one used by Video99UK that everybody here loves (or at least refuses to criticise).
-
-
there are different "flavors" of prores and each supports various pixel formats and bit depth.
prores lt and hq are 10-bit yuv422 but prores 4444xq is a really high quality 10-bit yuva444 variant and more demanding on the system to work with, -
There are a few things quite good about a DV workflow:
1. simple setup, particularly with the computer side of the equipment. with less to need to adjust, there is less to potentially get wrong
2. a quick & straightforward transfer chain (aka convenient)
3. because of quick & straightforward & simple, it is usually quite inexpensive to get hardware
4. codec is easy to accommodate with modern computers, bitrate & complexity-wise
There are also claims that it "fixes" issues with timebase. It doesn't - all it does is move the burden of that task away from the PC and toward the digitizing device. This often has the effect of "locking in" the image, but this could be a good image or a bad image, and it could be in sync or out of sync, depending upon how well the digitizing device handles wild signals. It clearly has a frame buffer on its output, but may not have one on its input. So, once again, we are left with the need - when using anything but rock solid signal timing - of a dedicated true TBC in line in the chain (obviously, upstream of the digitizing).
The downsides of standard DV workflow are already well known (even by Video99UK, I would assume):
1. DCT compression that is visible, noticeable, perhaps even objectionable with artifacts
2. locked in 8 bit color depth, which shows banding on content
3. forced to use 4:2:0 (for PAL) or 4:1:1 (for NTSC) color subsampling
4. locked into an older, less efficient codec format, that is no longer universally playable on devices (if it ever was)
****************
the OP's client has BetacamSP as a source, so luckily it *may* not need TBC assistance (that's another issue), but BetaSP is basically the pinnacle of SD analog quality, and it would be a shame to relegate its content to a middle-of-the-road/mediocre workflow, just because of convenience. And since they specifically asked for ProRes, there is a very good assumption that they intend to do further editing down the road, and that means that DV is by far less optimal quality-wise than ProRes at maintaining the pristine signal provided by BetaSP and expected throughout the workflow.
Scott -
So, this situation doesn't sound as abhorrent as first made out by some.
The OP usually uses DV. Fair enough. There is no suggestion that the OP has been spivving the client by using DV when they expect something else.
The client has asked for Prores for this Betacam SP tape. Fair enough.
The OP is asking for opinions on DV verses Prores. Fair enough.
The OP could/should capture that tape as requested.
Job done.
Where you get/How you install the Prores I have NFI! -
-
2. As was stated by the OP, this isn't vhs material, it is BetacamSP, so it DOES matter.
4. You don't ever want to compound your losses if you can avoid it, so for best practices of master quality video you should record to uncompressed, lossless, or near lossless (which high quality prores IS), and only after editing do a final lossy encode to your distribution codec of choice (e.g. h264, h265). So yes, it DOES matter.
And yes, recorders that record to h264 are, with few exceptions, not master level quality, either, so also to be avoided.
Contrast those with an AtomOS recorder that IS rated for master recording, and usually does record straight to prores.
Scott -
Rightly so. But it's still a noisy (although less so) analog input, so it's still marginal.
4. You don't ever want to compound your losses if you can avoid it, so for best practices of master quality video you should record to uncompressed, lossless, or near lossless (which high quality prores IS), and only after editing do a final lossy encode to your distribution codec of choice (e.g. h264, h265). So yes, it DOES matter.
And yes, recorders that record to h264 are, with few exceptions, not master level quality, either, so also to be avoided.
However, my experience with AverMedia ER330 (H.265 12Mbit/s for 576p) indicates that the quality is OK. Even UGREEN HDMI capture (75Mbit for 576p, mjpeg) gives decent quality, although it sucks for other reasons.
Contrast those with an AtomOS recorder that IS rated for master recording, and usually does record straight to prores. -
Noisy? Nope. BetacamSP's SNR was at wosrt 48-49, but usually 51-53dB. Which means it was better than consumer DV (49 theoretical max), and not quite the level of pro DVCam (55max) or DVCPro (56max).
Just because something is analog doesn't make it noisy, and neither does that argument hold true just because it's SD.
Sounds like you are going off presumptions & internet anecdotes instead of facts & first-hand experience here.
The conclusion is that DV is a consumer-based compromised format, which isn't likely appropriate for a pro source & workflow.
Scott -
Speaking of ProRes, where can the encoder be downloaded from or is it propriety to Apple programs?
-
You can try your luck here (I didn't):
https://www.winxdvd.com/video-transcoder/prores-codec-for-windows.htm
From there:
[Attachment 80960 - Click to enlarge]
or in ffmpeg:
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-codecs.html#ProRes
NLEs based on ffmpeg usually include these codecsLast edited by Sharc; 25th Jul 2024 at 02:33.
-
I have one, but I don't remember where from.
https://imgur.com/KPw4iFr
However, I suspect that this is a plugin for VD. -
Try according post#2 here:
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/367446-Virtualdub-External-Encoder-feature#post2348879
Edit: it works here:
[Attachment 80962 - Click to enlarge]Last edited by Sharc; 25th Jul 2024 at 03:45.
-
-
Last edited by Sharc; 25th Jul 2024 at 03:58.
-
That went well... not. All the FFMPEG entries disappeared (including the ProRes)) and now there's no ProRes at all. And what's with all the DLLs?
Pity the people that put this stuff together don't make a quick Readme about what to do with the files in the package. -
-
-
Originally Posted by rgr
I may have to, given the "new" 44282 version has those DLLs which the "old" 44282 doesn't.
As for ProRes, is that put in via those DLLs because it didn't show up with the new avlib-1 that I could see.
Originally Posted by Sharc
[Attachment 80963 - Click to enlarge]
[Attachment 80964 - Click to enlarge]
WHERE? -
@Alwyn: Your package seems not to be the latest version (if this should matter).
Download the avlib_vdplugin_0.7.093.7z only, keeping your current working Vdub2 as is. Unzip the .7z, and in the plugins64 folder there is the readme.md with the instructions:
# Usage
Copy 'avlib-1.vdplugin' to 'VirtualDub2\plugins64' folder.
Copy FFMpeg DLLs to 'VirtualDub2' folder.
* avcodec-61.dll
* avformat-61.dll
* avutil-59.dll
* swresample-5.dll
* swscale-8.dll
FFMpeg 7.0.1 binaries used: https://www.gyan.dev/ffmpeg/builds/packages/ffmpeg-7.0.1-full_build-shared.7zLast edited by Sharc; 25th Jul 2024 at 11:38.
Similar Threads
-
Need help converting a 16.10 1080p res to 1440p res (1680 x 1080)
By Joakim in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 28th Nov 2022, 12:35 -
pro res
By devdev in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 17th Dec 2021, 08:07 -
Adobe Premier and Apple Pro Res HQ
By Johnnysh in forum Video ConversionReplies: 9Last Post: 4th Sep 2021, 13:06 -
Pot player 4K Pro res MOV audio out of sync
By NickMDal in forum Software PlayingReplies: 1Last Post: 2nd Oct 2020, 09:18 -
Is converting MXF to pro-res worse than recording directly to pro-res
By NickMDal in forum EditingReplies: 4Last Post: 30th Sep 2020, 17:33