Hi all, so I知 currently working on a project for myself I知 working with multiple mp4 files that are 1280x720 with a 4,500 mb/s rate and a 29.97 frame rate and I知 encoding them so they池e blu ray compliant. I知 currently using tmpgenc authoring works 7. Obviously the goal is to lose the least amount of quality possible so I have my encoding settings at high profile 4.1, 59.97 fps, max bitrate at 23,000, avg bitrate at 10,300 and 2 pass vbr on the very slow option.
Am I wasting time with these settings? Will the higher bitrate offset the loss in quality due to encoding? Will the 2 pass help with the quality? Would these settings be good enough with a 1 pass vbr?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
Last edited by Littlebase631; 2nd Jan 2024 at 02:31. Reason: Title
-
Maybe you could try use the "Auto" for the fps! Im not sure about the program you are using, but in for example Avidemux you can just click an box "BluRay compability", seem to me the "High" profile fail to play in some video players while the "Main" got things going!
Edit: If you would decide to try Avidemux i think selecting "Average bitrate" is same or similar to VBR.. i tested with settings around 700-900 kbit/s, it seem to do allright to me, could probably boost it some to be sure! -
Those are the settings it picked by default I just enabled 2 pass and very slow option to ensure the best quality and upped the bitrate by 300 mbbs to max out the file sizes on disc without going over the disc capacity.
-
Yeah the very slow encoding options seem to work out real good, i use it as often as i can, it take pretty long time sometimes to encode but it seem to be worth it!
Edit: If using a lil bit lower bitrate (ie. 700-800) and slightly lower fps (ie 25-30) they seem to function with video players that can crash/lagg with 60 fps mp4's and higher bitrates, maybe same with blu ray players? to much bit rates and fps maybe some cant handle the video? the lower fps and bitrate videos seem to require less performance allso and play a lil bit easier on the pc atleast, i think the VBR choice would help prevent such issues compared to CBR!Last edited by Swedaniel; 2nd Jan 2024 at 06:42.
-
1280 ラ 720 29.97p, 16:9 is already Blu-ray compliant.
So if you want the maximum quality, take the videos as they are.
Any further encoding will degrade the quality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray#Video -
That wikipedia reference is wrong .
For 1280x720 29.97p to be BD compliant , you need a frame repeat flag, or 59.94 with actual duplicates.
(There are other considerations, such as buffer, GOP size, references to make it fully compatible - but an authoring tool that re-encodes should get it right) -
So after a comparison I made with 2 pass video and 1 pass video I see no change in quality at all so I知 going to stick with the 1 pass vbr at very slow settings
Last edited by Littlebase631; 2nd Jan 2024 at 13:06.
Similar Threads
-
Encoding SD NTSC to Blu-Ray compliant format
By bigass in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 22nd Jul 2021, 12:41 -
Blu Ray/DVD/HDD Purchase Advice
By Moody2blue in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 5Last Post: 4th Mar 2021, 07:03 -
Blu-ray and DVD to Video File
By Cptkirk363 in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd May 2020, 09:18 -
Blu-ray compliant with ffmpeg 2-pass vs mp4
By Squeeto in forum Video ConversionReplies: 7Last Post: 14th Feb 2019, 22:04 -
Can a Blu-ray player play Blu-ray video burned on a DVD?
By digicube in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 2Last Post: 16th Jan 2019, 01:11