Yes . But the source "7-1243).avi" also exhibits the issue
deinterlaced.mp4 has false chroma motion probably from temporal deinterlacer (QTGMC?), but it looks ok given the source quality. So QTGMC "fixes" the problem in a way; QTGMC also fixes it for "(20230717-1246).avi" . yadif / bwdif have the problem because they don't have the temporal characteristics of QTGMC
The only reason I noticed this was the yadif sample had problems, then looked at the source
I'd argue it's better to get a proper capture, assuming the chroma was "normal" in the first place. If not, then QTGMC to the rescue
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 60 of 73
-
-
For OP, display of the problem discovered by master poisondeathray (U and V channels do not "move" as Y channel):
[Attachment 72526 - Click to enlarge]
edit: for a proper interlaced material the capture should be:
[Attachment 72527 - Click to enlarge]Last edited by lollo; 18th Jul 2023 at 12:04.
-
lollo i am using this guide to cqapture my source http://aaproductions.net/amarectv.htm are you saying that during my capture i am somehow missing other channels?
-
You're missing samples over time from the U,V channels (the color information channels) in your 2 AVI videos - They only have 1/2 the color samples over time . Instead of 50 samples / second, there are 25 samples /sec consisting of duplicates to make up "fake" 50 samples/sec . Since the greyscale information has 50 real samples/sec, this causes a misaligment of color during motion - a sort of color flicker
It's not clear what is the underlying cause of the problem - it could be on specific tapes (recorded like that), or maybe some issue with a specific camera, or maybe some issue with the capture setup or process . You'd have to systematically do some tests to figure it out -
[Attachment 72530 - Click to enlarge]
so if i go to the options of Lagarith i get the following screen and in the Mode it says RGBA, RGB, YUY2, YV12 does it matter which one i choose? -
No; lagarith is a special case in that it uses what pixel type is fed into the encoder when you use RGB(default) . e.g. If YUY2 data is sent, lagarith will use YUY2 even if you have RGB(default) selected .
This is not the cause for the U,V channel defect. Even if there was a pixel type conversion issue (e.g. maybe it converts to RGB in a progressive vs. interlaced manner), there would be other types of artifacts - not the ones you are seeing here -
I got the same washed out path on video when i tried AV2HDMI converter paired with hdmi usb capture (garbage setup). It appeard on almost every tape but only when this setup was used. With different capturing equipment it wasnt happening. Have you tried capturing with other devices or maybe tried to play it directly on TV?
-
Ok so i had not tried the dazzle once i had everything working with vidbox but when i went back to Dazzle the weird color banding on the top goes away and the video looks much better but it drops frames like 10 out of a 100 or something where it is noticeable while the same settings with the Vidbox captures with no dropped frames on Amarectv. The kicker is it drops frames when i am not even capturing it just drops frames with black screen
Last edited by MrKool; 19th Jul 2023 at 10:38.
-
So your setup which does not produce the color banding is AmarecTV + Lagarith + Dazzle? Or does your Dazzle convert to mpeg2 or H.264 on the fly?
Upload a short sample of the capture so we can take a look whether the Chroma (U,V) is now handled correctly. -
Last edited by MrKool; 19th Jul 2023 at 15:03.
-
-
The new dazzle capture seems to be basically ok. Interlaced TFF. The former color issues (banding and chroma advancement for both fields) seem to have gone.
The black level is a bit high, but this something for later discussion.
Now you should tackle the reason for the dropped/duplicated frames.
- Stop any other tasks running in the background (virus scanner, downloads, indexers etc)
- Maybe reboot your PC before starting the capturing
- Defragment the HD?
- ......... -
The new dazzle capture seems to be basically ok
-
-
I don't think my computer is the issue i have a Aleinware R13 with 3090 GPU and 24 Core i9 Processor, NVME 1TB HD with read and write speed in access of 2500 MB/s i can run all games at Full resolution and settings at Ultra on a 4k monitor without any issues
here is the task manager with Amarectv running
[Attachment 72544 - Click to enlarge]
Also as i said Dazzle drops frames even if i am not capturing anything which is kinda odd. May be it is a windows 11 issue? i heard they butchered capturing in windows 11 -
-
-
AmarecTV+Hauppauge USB live2 (or I-O Data GV-USB2).
With the Hauppauge USB live2 I would strongly recommend to use one of the recommended DVD recorders in passthrough in order to "convert" the composite signal of your videocam to an S-Video. The DVD recorder acts as a Y/C filter which is poor for the Hauppauge USB live2 composit input. The I-O Data GV-USB2 has a better internal Y/C filter which may avoid the extra DVD recorder.
FWIW here the deinterlaced version of your Dazzle capture - with the dropped frames of course. -
I don't think my computer is the issue i have a Aleinware R13 with 3090 GPU and 24 Core i9 Processor, NVME 1TB HD with read and write speed in access of 2500 MB/s i can run all games at Full resolution and settings at Ultra on a 4k monitor without any issues
As Sharc said, the Dazzle capture apparently does not have the 25 field chroma problem (I did not check everywhere), but is affected by inserted frames and probably by dropped frames. Check the log of the capture
[Attachment 72552 - Click to enlarge]
to see where the inserted/dropped frames occur, eventually capture once more to see if they are exactely at the same time, meaning a tape problem, or not. -
-
You may also capture to an external USB 3.0 HDD or SSD to offload the disk with the OS.
Last edited by lollo; 19th Jul 2023 at 17:38.
-
Besides turning off unneeded services and apps, I suggest turning off the internet. It significantly improved the situation for me.
-
-
ok i think i have it figuerd out mostly the dazzle device drivers for the video card were from 2014 i found a newer set of drivers that i had to manually force install that were from 2020 and now it seems that during normal play back it does not drop frames and the colors and stuff looks decent. i am attaching both the video and the report file please check and let me know if this is the best i am gonna get so i can start capturing.
-
-
You see jumps in the video? I am not seeing them also the report file at the bottom says
Compression : FourCC=LAGS, Description=Lagarith Lossless Codec
Setting : 720*576, 25.00fps
Original Video Size: 867MByte
Compress video Size: 334MByte(38%, 1/2.596), 7658KB/s(61271kbps)
Frame count= 1097f, Drp= 0f, Avg Enc=4.047ms, Avg Cmp= 38%
Doesn’t it mean it has 1097 frames with 0 drops?
Similar Threads
-
Trying to record from MiniDV to my PC...pulling my hair out
By dazzystar in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 3Last Post: 10th Oct 2022, 15:54 -
Intel Tiger Lake Linux AV1 Hardware Video Decoding Support Ready
By Alkl in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 3rd Sep 2020, 11:46 -
Pulling my hair out on deinterlacing from Amarec..
By ugzz in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 30Last Post: 14th Aug 2020, 09:39 -
Tearing my hair out trying to download various HLS video streams in 1080p
By Videoenthusiat in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 20Last Post: 23rd Apr 2020, 06:49 -
Best tape for Panasonic M9000 Camcoder ?
By hayk in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 0Last Post: 6th Jan 2019, 13:20