Decryption: The Dungeon of Despair

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Ok, maybe I didn't explain myself well. I'll try again:

So I changed the CDM: renamed the device.wvd to something different and copied another .wvd from inside a zip named REAL-CDM-L3-main.zip, dowloaded from some thread I don't remember now...
Run it again and... TADAAAAA!!!

Best regards.

Two effing hours of my life gone because a CDM is blown?
I've known since it returned from testing that the code worked on the site in question, so if it didn't work you for it must have been down to you.

However, a rejected CDM was off my radar.

If you read the development history of hell3.py you'll see the GUI came last, and all recommendations are now to use the GUI. Why wouldn't you? And indeed the plan is to drop the Terminal version soon. I introduced pyperclip myself here to VH in a number of earlier programs. I ceased to use because I found it could introduce artefacts into the text and its use confused non-technical users. If you find it helps, all well and good. Allow me to quote myself:-

For you and all AllHell3 users: If you go to a tool-shop and buy a chisel you'll find it sharp. And for some it will be good enough. But if you want it even sharper, polish the chisel back to a mirror finish, and then put an edge on the tool. You'll make it your own.

The script you have is tool and it can be tuned to your need.

To be clear, everyone despite assertions, Allhell3Gui works fine on this site in question - if you feed it a REAL i.e. non-virtual CDM - one extracted from a proper Android device - that it.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

I understand that not everyone is willing to learn, but I think that the response of the person I helped says enough

But true to form, your 'help' was to publicise your own material. Mr Puff.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Is that now allowed?

'That' being what? Mr Puff. As far I am aware; that, this, those, them are all perfectly respectable here.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Your sole interest, it seems to me, is your own self-publicity. Isn't it? You jump on my threads, ostensibly to help but in reality to shout 'look at me'.
My reading of you is of a script-kiddie whose life's current, highly-driven, purpose is all about your own inner-self-validation, part of which is building a reputation, and more generally following a path of self-aggrandisement. Hence the Mr. Puff moniker. Maybe you'll find life easier when you leave school. You're not sure who you are yet. Are you?

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

No one is attacking you, silly boy, I'm just pointing up your self interest as a prime motivation. "By their actions shall you know them" is written in a Book somewhere, I recall . And I think you are in denial or maybe just can't recognise yourself yet.
On GitHub for instance you feel the need to preface your handle with Dev. Short for Developer, I suppose. That's exactly what children do. Big themselves up. So we reveal ourselves so readily.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Attacks can only be judged by the recipient, and I see this as one.
Your argument seems to be fading, which resulted in you looking me up on GitHub.
This lead to the assumtion that i chose the 'dev' name because that what kids do... This can also be easily debunked by just looking at my profile for more than a few seconds to see what I've written my README.md: "Hi, I’m @DevLARLEY because LARLEY was already taken."

Self aware enough then to be embarrassed.You still chose Dev - ask yourself why?

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Embarrassed by what?

By puff, tedious child! Learn some netiquette and stop puffing yourself in the threads of other coders. Simple really.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

I've explained already my observations stem from your behaviour. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck ...

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

The perspicuity of my argument is only emphasized by your desire for a 'no i'm not', 'yes you are' dichotomy. Kindly know it leads nowhere.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

I sense a change of style: did you think of all that yourself?

I'm known here for having the occasional tilt at the pompous and puffed-up. You certainly fall into the second category and came to me, if you remember.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Gosh! You miss the point entirely there. I'm not suggesting for one minute you are pompous. I am suggesting you are a bit hung up on seeking glory and you puff yourself in a busy thread, hoping for eyeballs, one assumes. That is the issue. One coder doing that to another is rude: you seem unable or unwilling to understand that. I had considered you quite bright. I'm revising that notion a little in light of your response. I never thought you would misunderstand clear language. Perhaps you should read more fiction.

[larley]

..

[SE14man]

Probably best to avoid engaging with Angela. Her head has disappeared way too far up her own arse. You can't reason with someone like that.

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

I agree that this interlude has been silly to the extreme. I find those that puff themselves, whomsoever they may be, annoying to the extreme. I find I cannot resist the chance to bait them a little. If the Puffs of this World don't like it, they can just stay away from my thread.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

At least now you've understood that my help does not involve "puffing".

??

No exactly the opposite. I think you are the epitome of Mr Puff (See https://dictionary.cambridge.org/thesaurus/puff-oneself-up)

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Then I guess you're the only person on this forum with that thought

Does that matter? Perhaps I perceive what others cannot. And only a puffed person would claim to know what everyone else thinks - so you make my point for me.

[larley]

..

[A_n_g_e_l_a]

Isn't it obvious? There is noone else like you

Again Mr. Puff claims infinite knowledge to assert 'no-one else'.

You should know, in formal logic, it is impossible to prove a negative, sweet-thing. So your statement has no validity... like much of your recent posts.

Unique thinking does not make the thought inherently wrong.