I just replaced a GTX 1050 (not Ti, 2 gig RAM) with a GTX 1660 with 6 gig RAM. Got it for under $200 shipped as sanity is finally returning to GPU prices.
Why the GTX 1660? It was the most affordable Nvidia GPU I could find with Nvenc that (unlike the GTX 1050) does B frames.
In practice, what does that do for me in terms of HEVC quality and compression VS the GTX 1050?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Turing chips (except TU117) are documented to support B-frames in HEVC encoding. They will certainly enhance efficiency in comparison to HEVC encoding without B frames.
But compared to CPU encoding, GPU encoding will probably remain limited, due to a more limited temporal scope (uploading a lot of uncompressed video frames from RAM to VRAM would be a heavy burden). -
The GTX 1660 does encode faster. A 1920x800 HEVC with 5.1 AAC audio to 1280x532 HEVC with 2.0 AAC audio. Runtime 53:15 encoded in 4:46 minutes with an average FPS of 270.
Also when I set the size to 230 megabytes it slightly undershot the mark VS how the GTX 1050 always went over the desired size.
Similar Threads
-
Using ffmpeg batch file with Nvidia GTX 1650 super
By G4SAQ Russ in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 4th Apr 2021, 11:34 -
Why is the NVIDIA GTX 1660 faster in 8K hevc encoding than the RTX 3070 ?
By Video Grain in forum Video ConversionReplies: 14Last Post: 25th Nov 2020, 17:16 -
I bought a GTX 1080 and I'm disappointed
By gription in forum ComputerReplies: 23Last Post: 1st Mar 2019, 09:45 -
Mini gtx 1070 opinion
By johns0 in forum ComputerReplies: 0Last Post: 19th Apr 2018, 20:22 -
GF GTX 1060 can't efficiently accelerate HEVC & VP9 with software players.
By Stears555 in forum Software PlayingReplies: 32Last Post: 16th Oct 2017, 13:18