Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 271 to 300 of 351
Thread
-
@DB83,
It took me a while to check the blu ray on my PC.
I had a BD player but the registration expired.
So I set up VLC to play the blu ray.
It is noisy or grainy in the sky on both my PC & my TV.
So the noise is on the blu ray disc.
It's been a long time since I've used avidemux.
Looks like 2.7.4 is the latest version for Windows 32-bit
@ Alwyn,
The clip in my post #35 in this topic is from the original DVD rip.
I checked it on the DVD also & the noise or grain is on it also.
Here is a short clip from the DVD files created with BD Rebuilder from the BD rip.
It also has the grainy sky.Last edited by cholla; 29th Jul 2024 at 14:10.
-
I have been re-reading the reviews for the 2011 BD release. The grain is mentioned but, generally, has not bothered the reviewers.
I have attempted some removal with little or no success. And, typically, removal will soften the image which was stated is already quite soft in places. Better to leave well alone in this respect since not all scenes are affected. -
@Cholla, The larger expanse of sky in your clip in post 259 (from your latest Bluray) hasn't been shown before; that's what piqued my interest. On that original VOB of post 35, there's noise in the sky with the bloke with the pipe but that didn't catch my eye. It's all in the eye of the beholder, of course. I certainly wouldn't class it as "grain".
Originally Posted by DB83 -
From early in this topic I said I was not experienced with Avisynth & I've been too busy with all the other programs to try to learn much more yet.
I did do a search & some quick reading on Temporaldegrain2 in Avisynth. It seems it is very slow.
If you look closer I believe you will find the pipe is a cigar.
For the sky in the scene I agree wit Alwyn just some noise & not real grain.
It did not bother me either but since it was asked about I answered. -
Sure that the avisynth filters are more effective than those included in avidemux. And it does look like that the HQ version has had some noise reduction done to it. The overall issue is if the time involved is worth the final result.
IMO live with the noise and grain and just concentrate on removing the sidebars which is a 'piece of cake' -
This old Virtualdub 32 bit plugin also helps with this, not sure if anybody tried it (denoise.vdf by tHE fISH)
-
Back at my computer...
There are noticeable differences between the 4:3 VOB and the 16:9 bluray:
-the bluray looks to be stretched laterally: the heads are wider;
-the bluray does have more noise (interestingly, the online version, otherwise the same as the bluray, sems to have less noise);
-the bluray brightness levels much darker with almost no detail in the darker areas (blue of coat) and the faces are too dark/well tanned ;
-the colours of the bluray are nicer/more saturated;
-the bluray is sharper (as one would expect at the higher resolution).
-the bluray is the same, structurally-speaking, as the file on m4uhdtv.
[Attachment 81166 - Click to enlarge]
I'd boost the middle level.
Originally Posted by Davexnet -
^^
... the blu-ray has more active picture content on all sides (left/top/right/bottom).
Added:
Taking your (Alwyn's) screenshot above (or inspecting the originals): additional picture content marked yellow in the blu-ray version.Last edited by Sharc; 3rd Aug 2024 at 16:35.
-
And now you have the bluray, you can crop away the side bars. There would be no point in cropping to 1.85:1; you retain more of the picture cropping to 16:9.
16:9 on the left, 1.85:1 on the right:
[Attachment 81191 - Click to enlarge]
It also denoises nicely; I used Neat Video but I'm sure the freebies will do a good job too. The more you notice it, the noise is bad, obvious even on the coats.
PS: Not that I am suggesting you do any cropping!Last edited by Alwyn; 4th Aug 2024 at 05:16.
-
These are what I've been working on.
I have not tried to denoise any of them.
The first one is the clip of the rip of the 2011 1.66:1 bluray.
I believe I have posted this previously but since it is the one that the following conversions are from I'm posting it here also. Horse.m2ts
The next 2 are the forced 1.85:1 from the 1.66:1 that I think DB83 wanted to see. One .m2ts & one to .MP4.
Horse_scale(01).m2ts & Horse_scale(01).mp4 (I just posted the .MP4 since they used the same codec in ffmpeg).
These have small bars top & bottom & no pillars.
The next 2 had the DAR set at 16/9 instead.Otherwise the same code.
They have no bars or pillars.One .m2ts & one to .MP4.
Horse_scale(169).m2ts & Horse_scale(169).mp4 (I just posted the .MP4 since they used the same codec in ffmpeg).
All above done with FFMPEG
The last one was done with avidemux to .MP4 with the crop done as autocrop suggested. Horse(AviD).mp4
On one of my computers it has no bars or pillars on the other computer is has pillars but no top & bottom bars.
I believe the difference is in the video card.
On my 55" Sharp TV playrd from my settop BD player it has no pillars or top & bottom bars but has severe green aftifacting.
Then it clears to normal & back to the green artifacting.(in the longer video but remains artifacted in this short video)Last edited by cholla; 6th Aug 2024 at 09:52. Reason: Making shorter videos
-
The Q. of cropping is down to personal taste. And it was mentioned several pages ago that if you want the 'authentic' feel of 1.85:1 you have no choice but to crop an additional 42 pixels in total compared with a 16:9 variant.
But is it just my poor eyes - I only looked at scale(01).mp4 - but the noise in the blue sky at the start appears less.
And is it just my one half-good ear that I hear no sound ? -
-
Thanks Dave, I can't get it to do much, even on 10:
[Attachment 81226 - Click to enlarge]
@Cholla, I suggest you keep your samples down to ~20mb; you get more interested downloaders then.
And FYI, "MP4" and "MT2S" in this case are basically the same; the underlying video codec is H264/AVC (check with MediaInfo). There's no need to use both. -
@Cholla, you're distorting the video. On the left is the Horse m2ts file you posted from the Bluray (ignore the "frame 1535"); on the right is your latest Horse_scale(169).mp4. Check out John Wayne's head.
[Attachment 81228 - Click to enlarge] -
-
Alwyn, I looked at it again, I agree, it's more subtle than I thought last time, the Vdub filter softens it slightly which
appears to lower the grain slightly. Whether it's worth the trouble is not up to me.
Using Temporaldegrain2 in Avisynth gets rid of all the grain at a default settings; it can be tweaked to
temper the effect but it's so slow (on my old PC anyway)
The other benefit of Avisynth is that it keeps it in the yuv(yv12) color space; no need for the RGB conversion from the vdub filter. -
-
-
The noise looks about the same to me.
I decided to not include any audio to make the clip a bit smaller.
I can make smaller clips & I will do that but the duration will be much shorter.
For the "MP4" and "MT2S" they looked the same to me also & I checked the MediaInfo.
I thought that the "MT2S" might force a square pixel where the "MP4" may not.
To me this is just larger frame equals larger image. So of course John Wayne's head is larger.
John Wayne's head is larger when I go to full screen in a media player.
John Wayne's head is larger when I play it on my TV than on my computer monitor played with a media player.
It would look funny if John Wayne's head stayed the smaller size on larger screens.
The grain does seem to be gone or a lot less.
I need to learn how to do this with Avisynth Right now I do not know how. -
-
-
Originally Posted by Cholla
Originally Posted by Cholla
If you are showing us a piece of video, we only need a few seconds covering the area of interest. -
For that version the default for degranTR is 1, meaning that there is not much analysis of previous and next frames for grain removal (although still effective in denoising).
You may want to experiment degrainTR=2 or 3 for a stronger denoise, potentially to the detriment of more fine details preservation. -
I guess the fatter heads do no bother me.
To me that look larger because the video is larger.
Since I have NO plans to pirate & sell copies & only family & friends will ever see the video.
To myself & them I believe the video will be OK.
I am trying to figure out avisynth but so far I'm not making much progress.
If I do I will see if I can denoise or degrain this video.
@ DB83 ,
Are you able to see the artifacting in Horse(AviD01).mp4 ?
Like I posted I only see it when played with my BD settop player to my TV.
The TV will not play this video strait into it's USB port.
I'm not sure why. -
^^ I did not view/download your original version of AviD01 so can not comment on how that looked compared with your edited version.
Except that your edited version makes no attempt at proper rescaling and just crops the sidebars.
For assistance you might wish to share your ffmpeg script since I would not do it this way and rely on cropping(horizontal) >> scaling >> cropping(vertical) all done in avidemux(or any tool that gives you real control) which should preserve the true aspect ratio of all. (whilst an autocrop to 1804 pixels may be accurate, it is not, in my book, the way to go. When I did my compare I took as my guide the frame from the HQ version which was 1200 pixels wide. That, itself, equates to 1800 pixels i.e. a crop of 60+60 to, potentially, avoid any additional and potential issue on any screen that can not accept 1804 pixels - which really should invoke sidebars already cropped)
Similar Threads
-
MINI DV conversion
By rdm4rbrhntu55001234 in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 4Last Post: 17th Sep 2017, 20:09 -
DV to Lagarith conversion help
By robmausser in forum Video ConversionReplies: 7Last Post: 19th Aug 2017, 22:27 -
colorspace conversion
By hanaluluelle in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 29th Mar 2017, 10:02 -
MP4 conversion help
By jabbo5150 in forum MacReplies: 6Last Post: 17th Feb 2017, 04:20 -
Conversion Software
By Wakenaam in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 8th Jan 2016, 13:32