Has anybody tried this out yet? I tried using it on CRF20 and other than producing large files and having noticeably lower quality than using x264; I thought it was a pretty good balance of time spent encoding and resulting quality. What are your thoughts on this? Is NVENC H265 worth using if I am looking to do quick encodes? The disk space used doesn't bother me. I can always buy a larger HDD when one comes out for a reasonable price. I mainly want to produce these files to watch on my laptop or phone when I'm not at home. I'd prefer not to peg out my Ryzen 7 1800X for an hour at a time encoding with x264 if I can run an encode with NVENC in a fraction of the time and be okay with the resulting file.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
Last edited by stonesfan99; 30th Apr 2020 at 10:24.
-
Found it better to do an average bitrate encode instead of CQ. Around 2500 kbps to 3500 kbps for 1080p encodes quite well. 1500 kbps for animation.
Similar Threads
-
Vidcoder vs HandBrake
By Hippie_forever in forum Video ConversionReplies: 8Last Post: 4th Mar 2020, 16:41 -
About Handbrake, Intel QSV and nvidia NVenc
By BlurayHD in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 9th Feb 2020, 04:34 -
VidCoder h.264 QSV vs. NVENC
By Allan74 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 5Last Post: 4th Mar 2019, 20:25 -
How accurate are preview encodes with Vidcoder, Handbrake, etc?
By strawberryshortcake in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 13th Feb 2018, 20:24 -
Will Handbrake and VidCoder ever get NVenc support?
By bizzybody in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 5th Feb 2018, 01:55