I got a Digital8 Camera to digitize a tape I have and I'm copying it directly with Firewire, but it seems like it has some odd scan line type of artifact on some parts. I only have one tape to test it with but It seems to only be on fairly bright/white parts of the screen, and It is more noticeable after adjusting the brightness/contrast.
Check the raw file, look at her face/cheek and you can just barely see it when the lights are bright. It's not interlacing, it's like a darker set of lines just there. Then when adjusting the brightness/contrast afterwards it is also more visible, and it is slightly seen on the equipment on the lower left side of the screen with the light shining on it. It doesn't go away after deinterlacing. And the lines look darker than the surrounding stuff, that's why they are noticeable. Also the S-video out and composite have the same problem when hooked to a TV, actually it is more noticeable.
Also why does the raw file look really blocky? After QTGMC it is almost entirely gone, but on the edges of everything (like her hair) in the raw file it looks very blocky, is that just part of the way it is interlaced?
I just want to make sure that this is "normal" and not something wrong with the camera I bought.. (A Sony DCR-TRV320)
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread
-
-
I just want to make sure that this is "normal" and not something wrong with the camera I bought.. (A Sony DCR-TRV320)
The contrast of the very brightest part of the image alternates every half-field, for some reason.
Single field
Code:AVISource("DV.avi",pixel_type="YUY2") ColorYUV(off_y=-16,gain_y=-4) SeparateFields() Histogram()
[Attachment 51339 - Click to enlarge]
Split into two. If you open the images below in two different tabs in your browser and switch quickly between them you can see how the center of the image flickers from near-white to true white and the brightest part of the histogram jumps up to fully-clipped in the second image.
Code:AVISource("DV.avi",pixel_type="YUY2") ColorYUV(off_y=-16,gain_y=-4) SeparateFields() AssumeFrameBased().SeparateFields() Histogram()
[Attachment 51340 - Click to enlarge]
[Attachment 51341 - Click to enlarge]
I don't know how you might fix it so both halves are exposed the same.
Also why does the raw file look really blocky? After QTGMC it is almost entirely gone, but on the edges of everything (like her hair) in the raw file it looks very blocky, is that just part of the way it is interlaced? -
The interlacing comb artifacts are normal. But that's some really ratty DV video. Far worse than "normal" DV.
-
That must be because of how it was recorded right? Or somehow got worse over time? It's from 2004. I just want to be sure that there is nothing more I can do while I have the tape, because I'm sending the tape back to the person who filmed it.
After QTGMC it looks fine but could be better. I do have DV videos from MiniDV that look better as far as I can remember -
Thanks. It doesn't bother me too much if there is nothing that can be done, it just bothers me that I could be doing something wrong or there could be something wrong with the camera. I have seen those MiniDV cameras and you're right, it's very obvious when something is wrong.
-
Yes.
Deterioration of the tape would look far worse.
I did this:
Code:LWlibavVideoSource("DV.avi", format="YUY2") ColorYUV(gain_y=-10, off_y=-10) ConvertTOYV12(interlaced=true) QTGMC() TurnRight() QTGMC(InputType=2) TurnLeft()
-
One thing that can make things look blocky is if the person filming was zooming in with a digital zoom. Digital8 was a sort of transitional format. High-end cameras at the time would be using miniDV (or DVCAM) instead.
-
That blockiness is not digital zoom if it is it would be applied to the whole frame not just the bright parts, My interpretation is that the digital camcorder's compression chip when the light level shoots up to the roof it doesn't know what to do with the clipped levels so the compression algorithm goes to low resolution mode on those bright spots to save on data bandwidth. Notice that this happens all the time with even high end camcorders when other cameras flash strikes and the bright frames look horrible. That camera shutter suppose to adjust for light level quickly but it didn't, typical problem with low end camcorders back then. But if I was there at the time of that event I would have kicked that guy with the light torch. I've seen this in night events videos all the time and I'm not talking about camera flashes, I'm talking about the idiots with a video light that they keep turning on and off to save on camcorders battery screwing other people's work.
-
-
I realize that having santiag in my QTGMC script is actually why it looks much better after deinterlacing, I have it in there for VHS to smooth the edges a bit bit having it totally salvages this with those blocky edges. I have it twice in the script so it does a pretty good job. It makes a big difference.
Similar Threads
-
Geek fun with VBI, Macrovision, DVD recorders, NTSC scan lines
By Brad in forum CapturingReplies: 11Last Post: 30th May 2022, 17:21 -
Anyone know of a sub program that will break long lines into 3 lines?
By JeremyBrown in forum SubtitleReplies: 19Last Post: 13th Apr 2020, 18:03 -
Hot to move lines to next lines time?
By tevastevas in forum SubtitleReplies: 1Last Post: 23rd Aug 2019, 01:34 -
Streamclip MPEG creates artifacts (blue and multicoloured lines)
By Ed Barnett in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 28th Jul 2017, 16:50 -
DVDR with Lines on Top and Lines on Bottom?
By Disco Makberto in forum MediaReplies: 13Last Post: 14th Feb 2015, 02:34