The first quote is from Cornucopia, the second from veresov
He is not refusing to allow DGMVC to be used by your GUI, he doesn't want you distributing it directly, understandable considering you insulting his software.
As far as polluting threads, get your head out of your ASS, and stop trying to rewrite history, guess the methane is affecting your braincells.
I guess we are up to Christmas now
Results 61 to 82 of 82
How is your mental illness these days?
Groucho2004 (prior to your meltdown), Groucho, Zeppo
Split personality issue?
When are you going to call yourself Larry, Curly or Moe?
That is about your level.
Still haven't gotten over the fact that DG tossed your useless ass out of his forum, have you?
Hell, even Baldrick tossed you to the curb once
By the way
Are you, Atak and rolz joined at the hip facing each other, or are you three just having fun together
Are we up to 2020 yet?
Way to go Grouchy
DG deleted my account because I dared to make a little fun of his hero Donald Trump. Why would I want to continue being part of that bizzare community hosted by a psycho?
As for Baldrick deleting my account here - I asked for it but got no response. Therefore I tried a different approach which yielded an instant result:
So, once again you have proven what a pathetic little loser you are. Now, be good boy and climb back into DG's bunghole.
Originally Posted by LICENSE
And, why don't you post the quote with my supposed insults against him or his software? Of course, it's because there is none. On the other hand, I can prove that I tried to fix things, and all I got was a bunch of insults from him and his bulldogs like you.
And, of course, I'm rewriting history!
I am sorry that the community can no longer use his program, but I am not responsible for it, and it will not be solved by barking at me. Use FRIM, which works just as well, and stop insulting everyone around you for facts beyond their control.
As for Baldrick, he only tries to keep his forum safe from unnecessary, insulting and vulgar posts like yours. You and DG are attacking him in exactly the same way that Donald Trump is attacking the press. Anyone who has the audacity to disagree with him is called an idiot writing fake news. Nice mentality. I am surprised by Baldrick's clemency. Personally, I would have fired you a long time ago.
Did you even try it?
Did you not call DGMVCSource useless because you have FRIM?
And you still refuse to not distribute it
Did you go to Grouchy's school of rewriting history or are you getting prematurely senile
Are we up to 2021 yet?
the original thread, the post that triggered DG's incomprehensible reaction contains this:
Originally Posted by r0lZ
And immediately, DG lost it and forbade me to use his programs. Then, to calm the game, I explained that a program in alpha phase is potentially unstable. It was intentionally that I did not mention his programs, and that I only referred to the very definition of alpha release: potentially unstable. But he wouldn't listen. Is it my fault?
I'm not going to quote the rest of your message, or answer it, because it's just gratuitous insults. Instead, I'm going to do what I should have done from the beginning: stop trying to convince you. He is only as deaf as the one who does not want to hear.
The easiest way to shut up that gonca kid is just grab source code from here
, implement cosmetic changes and release compiled pluging under different name. Problem solved!
Thanks, Atak_Snajpera, but honestly I prefer to use FRIM only. Videofan3D is a good guy, and I prefer to use his decoder anyway.
Of course, if someone else want to continue the development of DGMVCSource, I have no reason to object to it. But it's probably useless, since FRIM is good and alive.
If the subject I have one more question about bd3d2mk3d. I encode this days an iso in 3D TAB with crf 15, preset very slow, and profile forced 4.1. I got a 29gb mkv. The original track was 32gb. And an 25.6gb overall bitrate. I try to do the best quality I dont mind about the size. Now I am confused about the bitrate if is low,high or is ok? As I read some forums saying is to high is not going to be playable on all devices. Other saying higher the better. Is playing in all my devices I try,tv,tv box,xbox,projector. So is this bitrate ok?
Thanks for bringing this thread back to the right direction, Scarredjoker.
Yes, it is true that a too high bitrate may be incompatible with some old, slow or cheap hardware players. But if you encode in h264 with level 4.1, you should be safe, as it's the level of the BD format (not UHD). Unfortunately, x264 uses the --level argument only to tag the file with that level, but it doesn't enforce the limitations necessary to respect that level. So, specifying the level is not sufficient, and that's probably the cause of the problems reported by many internet sites. But don't worry. BD3D2MK3D adds automatically the --vbv-bufsize and --vbv-maxrate arguments so that the specified level is really respected by the encoder. The bitrate will never exceed the legal bitrate of the specified level, even in its higher peaks. So, if you have specified the 4.1 level in the GUI, your encodes are certainly compatible with all modern hardware players.
However, I have noticed that the playback is sometimes jerky when a too slow preset is specified, notably on my Samsung TV, and other users have reported similar issues. I don't know the exact reason, but I suppose that the slowest presets use sophisticated compression methods or settings, difficult to decode in real time by a slow equipment. It's why I use only the slow preset.
If you want to be absolutely sure that your encodes will be played perfectly on all hardware players sold after the born of the blu-ray, you can enforce additional constraints to produce a truely BD compatible file, by ticking the "BD Compatible" option in the last tab. The price to pay will be a slightly larger file.
On the LG 4k 2016 I can see the difference from sitting 3m away. between preset slow and very slow. Very slow is superior quality. For my eyes I think crf 15 and preset very slow is the sweet spot for quality. I didnt notice the "jerky". I will watch the hole movie and I will confirm that if is any. I use to have some jerky when I use my external HDD to the tv but I swap to an SSD and I haven't notice anything from then. Ticking the 'BD compatible' it will affect in any way the quality too?
I am not trolling, just pointing out that you, Grouchy and r0lZ are engaging in copyright infrigment
So, unless you are being a hypocrite, the new license for DGMVCSource takes precedent and the old licenses are null and void
You and Groucho are the only TROLLS around here
our quote from D9 in which Adobe states that the license for old versions is no longer valid, and you don't question this.
Ps. I wonder why are you so aggressive at videohelp but at forum.doom9.org you are so polite. Let me guess! Is this because admins at doom9.org do not tolerate that kind of behaviour and immediately delete toxic posts and user? Posts/thread made by videoh aka versov aka neuron2 aka donald graft were also deleted. Think about my angry white knight...
Ps. I wonder why are you so aggressive at videohelp but at forum.doom9.org you are so polite
But you are right, the D9 mods do protect their pet donkeys well.
learn how to spell
I am not going to deal with either of you two dcks that think encouraging copyright infringement is acceptable
Maybe that is because neither one of you has any software worth stealing
Last edited by gonca; 30th Nov 2019 at 07:47.