VideoHelp Forum

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or Try ConvertXtoDVD and convert all your movies to DVD. Free trial ! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread
  1. YouTube is started to remastering old music videos https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2019/6/19/18691481/youtube-...d-remaster-umg
    But as I see quality is crap. Looks like they just just increased quality of old files and put some denoise filters. Aren't they? The really best restoration of music video I ever see that's from Beatles this project https://youtu.be/q-dJAC2tybE
    I'm wondering why record labels is not restoring old school videos, how many music hits in crap quality, what is need is just rescan film reels with modern film reel scanners which was not avialable 10 years ago
    Quote Quote  
  2. Originally Posted by eobardthawne View Post
    I'm wondering why record labels is not restoring old school videos, how many music hits in crap quality, what is need is just rescan film reels with modern film reel scanners which was not avialable 10 years ago
    It costs money for equipment and labour, you need to pay people to fix and restore. They don't scan and fix themselves. Are you going to pay for it ?

    If there was a viable business case it would have been done already.

    Such as if you and your friends are projected to buy "x" copies from Itunes. Or if "z" runs can bring in "$" dollars of ad revenue

    And that's assuming the original assets were in good shape, or not missing, or not roasting in some fire

    Or if someone wants to donate time/money/expertise to do it for free
    Quote Quote  
  3. Many music videos may have been shot on film, but they were virtually NEVER mastered on film. 1" tape or digital betacam were great in their day, but not hi-def. Unless you're the Beatles, there's not a big enough market for going back to the original elements (which may not even exist.)

    (edit: Beatles material of course WAS mastered on film as well.)
    Quote Quote  
  4. Because it doesn't matter all that much when you're watching it on a cr&ppy little mobile phone screen. Besides, most of the young 'uns I know wouldn't recognise quality - either audio or visual - even if it came up and kicked them repeatedly in the nads. As long as there are large numbers involved - it doesn't seem to matter whether it's size or cost - and it's loud and flashy they'll probably be happy.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    YouTube high quality is an oxymoron because of the need to reencode everything to their streaming standards. The comments on the article agree with the OP. The "remastered" videos are HD in name only.

    This is simply a test to see if they can make money from the "remasters". If they do, other studios may follow suit, but hopefully they'll offer them in true HD quality, either on their own streaming platform or Blu-Ray. Not on YouTube.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads