This has nothing to do with a specific software or a any type of video. I'm just talking about the placebo preset. I normally use Veryslow as my preset, but if placebo really does make a crazy difference I might start using it, but is it worth the time? Does it make a big difference in picture quality in videos?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
Placebo is just as the name implies, a placebo. It should technically have a slightly better bitrate efficiency over Very Slow, but usually costs 2-3x or more encoding time for a tiny improvement. I personally only ever use it for benchmark purposes and nothing else.
-
just wondering: the 'placebo preset' of what ? If you are not speaking of 'a specific software' what does this preset refer to?
users currently on my ignore list: deadrats, Stears555, marcorocchini -
Not worth it.
Actually it sometimes produces lower quality
The one case where it might be beneficial is ultra low bitrate scenarios, but even then it's been shown to produce lower quality sometimes
Similar Threads
-
Why x264 "placebo" preset produce bigger file than "very slow"?
By aleaksunder in forum Video ConversionReplies: 21Last Post: 2nd Mar 2019, 07:25 -
Good dvd creator with good quality
By Marios Georgiou in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 7Last Post: 22nd Jan 2017, 15:02 -
Why does x265 preset fast get the smallest file size by const. quality?
By Adsmt in forum Video ConversionReplies: 75Last Post: 16th Nov 2016, 18:59 -
Is madvr a placebo?
By manoluv in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 13Last Post: 3rd May 2015, 09:21 -
Handbrake Preset: x264-9898 (Standard Quality)
By adamf9898 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 15Last Post: 15th Apr 2015, 05:46