Hey,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me if Progressive video has nateraly better quality than Interlaced? I have the option to leave video as internaced for playback on my SVCD player, and in comparison, I could make the source progressive at the same framerate for playback.
So, without using 3:2 Pulldown (to keep framerates and bitrates even), should I expect nateraly better looking video from interlaced or Progressive encodes?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
if your viewing your footage on a normal tv, keep it interlaced you won't see the diff but you'll save some encoding time...
Similar Threads
-
Advice for simple, free video-editing software for a newbie
By belltown in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 4th Sep 2011, 22:25 -
Simple task, not so simple (rip/quicksync)
By Trife in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 10Last Post: 12th Aug 2011, 19:57 -
Adding extra material to the end of a simple 1 movie dvd (with simple menu)
By ColinKe in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 4Last Post: 24th Jul 2009, 22:38 -
AviAddXSubs simple question (hopefully!)
By vladman2nd in forum SubtitleReplies: 1Last Post: 8th Jul 2008, 01:01 -
Simple Mplayer Question
By Maikeru-sama in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 29th May 2008, 21:10