There's nothing clever about the harsh sharpening that you've done, and resulted in unnatural halos. That's just a basic/generic "sharpen" filter cranked up to 11. It's not actually nuanced, and does not take bad side effects into consideration in its algorithm.Clever sharpening
What does "post sharpening of video camera records" mean? That's a nonsense phase.I know it from experience from post sharpening of video camera records
That's humorous. I started in the 90s, when it was still was not feasible at home. I was using SGI MediaBase for MPEG and LAN streaming. Trying to do anything digital was painful in those days, and I had to wait about 5 more years before digital was actually doable outside of a broadcast/studio/IT facility. I had to suffice with analog setups bolstered by digital techniques.long before you started to notice the simple existence of digital videos.
You've entered the site making asinine claims, and attacking respected when your claims are shown to be BS.
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or try DVDFab and copy, convert or make Blu-rays and DVDs! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 32 of 32
The last time I tested NVEnc it was v3.27 and sadly H265 encoding was completely unusable.
The image quality in black/darker areas was so poor with blocky graphical glitches everywhere.
I'm happy to report things have much improved with NVEnc v4.09 regarding H265 encoding.
The overall image quality looks a little softer and less sharp compared to a H265 software encode. (I've not played around with VPP filters yet).
But the black/darker area image quality has been fixed and now looks much better.
It's far from perfect, but the results are now what I call 'acceptable'.
Encoded 1h36m58s 1080p/24 in 12 minutes @ 200fps.
i7 6700k @4Ghz / 16Gb DDR4 / GTX1080ti (Driver 398.36)