Just discovered this, hope it is helpful for someone.
I just installed the free app VirtualBox which allows you to run Windows on a Mac. I was also surprised to see that Windows works even if you don't purchase a license, though some customization features appear to be unavailable.
Both VirtualBox and Windows 10 installed correctly on the first try, and so after 25 years of being exclusively Mac, I now have Windows too. I did this specifically to get access to wider range of video and image editing apps.
If, like me, you've never used Windows before, the following excellent tutorial video series is proving quite useful.
Another reason to learn Windows. While the Mac was once the sole focus of Apple, the iPhone now makes up 2/3 of Apple's profits. If I remember correctly, the Mac makes up something like 15% of profits. Point being, the future of the Mac is unlikely to be the same as it's glorious past. I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple secretly sees the Mac as a legacy product they're tired of having to mess with.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
There are limits to running Windows on Mac effectively, one of them being its a waste if you need to do any serious video work. Prices on used Windows PCs are so ridiculously low, it makes much more sense to just buy one and have a dedicated workstation designed for Windows video software. Having two systems also frees up your Mac for the stuff it does best, like Photoshop or web surfing, while the Windows box is left free to process video files uninterrupted by other tasks.
If I remember correctly, the Mac makes up something like 15% of profits. Point being, the future of the Mac is unlikely to be the same as it's glorious past. I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple secretly sees the Mac as a legacy product they're tired of having to mess with.
There are limits to running Windows on Mac effectively, one of them being its a waste if you need to do any serious video work. Prices on used Windows PCs are so ridiculously low, it makes much more sense to just buy one and have a dedicated workstation designed for Windows video software.
As long as enough buyers feel the OS or design features are worth a price premium, Apple will keep selling Macs.
Photoshop on Mac than any other platform, and still do most of my websurfing and downloading on a Mac because its less worry and hassle. Having two systems also keeps most of my Windows boxes as offline dedicated workstations, esp nice in this era of Win10 telemetry nonsense.
And if you're in the unlucky position of being "technical support" for your extended family and friends, moving them to Macs lowers the burden 90%. Never, not once, in the past 25 years have I had to deal with virus or malware meltdowns for any of my friends/family on Macs. The Windows users, OTOH, drive me up a friggin wall and out of my mind with that crap: no matter how I lock them down, they find some way to get infected. Until and unless the hackers of the world get seriously interested in effectively targeting Mac porn and torrent users, they're a lot easier to support in this one arena (in other ways, not so much: every OSX upgrade is worse than the last).
Since you already own your Mac, adding a separate second-hand Windows PC after you get comfortable with the differences will be very affordable (and give you added flexibility).
http://www.myce.com/news/security-researchers-discover-ransomware-apple-computers-tor-network-82111/ so yes it is recommended that you have antivirus software for mac computers. avast mac security is supposed to be good - https://forum.avast.com/index.php?board=5.0
It often seems that way to those who don't have a long-term professional history of using and/or supporting Macs.
No doubt, at least half the college freshmen proudly sporting a new MacBook Air today are simply buying it based on herd instinct or glamor-advertising.
Never, not once, in the past 25 years have I had to deal with virus or malware meltdowns for any of my friends/family on Macs.
(in other ways, not so much: every OSX upgrade is worse than the last).
I'm really not in a position to compare the Mac to Windows, given that I've been using Windows only about a week. All I can see so far is that Windows isn't as pretty as the Mac interface, which is hardly breaking news. I find it puzzling why a company as rich as Microsoft can't hire more inspiring designers, but who cares really.
Most of my commentary arises from the fact that the Mac is no longer the sole focus of Apple as it once was, but rather now a small fraction of their profits. That, and when any company becomes as successful as Apple there's a natural human tendency to start coasting and adopt a "who cares" kind of attitude towards the user base, ie. Apple as the new Microsoft etc.
The branding machine is trying to keep us in the good old glory days when Steve and Woz were hungry young men determined to conquer the world etc. But the thing is, Apple's no longer young, no longer hungry, and they've already conquered the world. There's only one direction for the story to travel from here.
Nothing lasts for too long in this new Net based world we're creating. You know, Yahoo used to be the king of the world and it felt like that would last forever, and look at them now. Apple, Google, Microsoft, they'll all meet the same fate sooner or later, probably sooner.
Personally I wish Microsoft followed a similar approach to Apple's: kept the existing Windows 7 UI "look and feel" for computers and designed a different UI for mobile devices and gaming consoles.
Last edited by usually_quiet; 13th Aug 2017 at 11:25.Ignore list: hello_hello, tried, TechLord, Snoopy329
On the other hand, Apple can now sell you a desktop AND a phone, so perhaps they will resist the idea of combining the two platforms. Or, perhaps they will combine the devices and use that feature as a way to sell more phones at ever higher prices.
Personally, I have no use for the fancy pants phones and am baffled as to why people want to work on postage stamp size screens, and carry a device that allows people to interrupt them any time of day no matter where they are or what they're doing. But it seems this is an extremely minority position, and the phones are here to stay, and the desktops may be on the way out.
Could this change tomorrow? Absolutely. But since it hasn't changed significantly since OSX debuted in 2002, and desktops/laptops are being rapidly obsoleted as a consumer products anyway, there may not be any Macs left to speak of by the time their malware vulnerability matches Windows in scale. I can train Mac users not to fall for phishing links or fake alert popups, but no amount of training can protect my Windows users from a new automated attack that bypasses even the latest anti-malware systems.
To be fair to developers (I used to be one) the Facebook/phone/texting era does seem to be delivering what many or most Net users want.
Facebook is hugely popular, because it's built around the publication of sentence fragments. Twitter is even worse. Same for texting. Meanwhile, forums are dying because they were designed to facilitate the sharing of entire paragraphs (gasp!).
As example, I recently contacted a local Mac shop I just discovered to inquire about their used Macs. I contacted them via the contact form they installed on their website. The very first thing, the only thing really, they want to talk about is how to get the conversation out of email and on to their phones.
I have this experience all the time, people just can't bear the thought of having to type entire sentences. In fact, even though I expressed very specific interest in a very specific range of used Macs, a product they clearly want to sell, nobody from the Mac shop has followed up on my interest. They'd rather lose what would be a repeat customer than have to type.
In the not too distant future every word typed on the net will be "me". I mean, c'mon, we don't have time for all these pointless details, let's get to the bottom line. But then folks will complain that two characters is so incredibly burdensome, so "me" will be shortened to "I", thus brilliantly reducing the typing burden by 50 per cent!
would you recommend mac users use antivirus software or not ??
Here's a start I learned about on another forum. It's free, and it worked for me one time in removing some browser crap.
Norton itself has always been a rollercoaster: some years its garbage bloatware, other years its surprisingly effective. I have the current Norton running on my most-abused Win7 box, and its been remarkably good at fending off some ugly attacks (even when I intentionally go to a known-awful drive-by site). My less-abused Win laptops run Avira, plus Malwarebytes etc.