+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
If someone feels the need to read more than a snarky comment from Selfie, here is an actual news story about Dell's new 8k monitor: http://www.anandtech.com/show/11220/dells-32-inch-8k-up3218k-display-now-for-sale
Ignore list: hello_hello, tried, TechLord, Snoopy329 -
Marsia MarinerGuest
Thanks for the URL. From the comments's section:
xchaotic - Friday, March 24, 2017
I'll take the bait. Not only that, but it's a bit small for 8k. I think 40 -43" is the sweet spot for 4k, so 8k would need to be even larger than that. Why pay for resolution that you can't see?
Finally a nice little g-sync module wouldn't make a huge difference in the BOM and it's especially useful here as you can't hope for a stable 60FPS in any game...
Endda - Friday, March 24, 2017
I was just thinking, people already ragged on me for buying a 27" 4K monitor, a 32" 8K monitor seems to be even worse in that regards.
hansmuff - Friday, March 24, 2017
I bought a 28" 4K for my workplace because I sit at it all day and I consider it too small. I have to use Win7 (work) so the scaling isn't wonderful. It works and is better than some 2 screen hack certainly, but yeah 32" 8K is just not what I consider reasonable. I would be curious to see how awesome you can render fonts on that, though. -
'Do I look absolutely divine and regal, and yet at the same time very pretty and rather accessible?' - Queenie
-
Key to resolution is to not see resolution... if you see pixels then resolution is too low. Sufficiently high DPI remove main issue with digitized signals and sampling itself - spatial aliasing.
-
Ignore list: hello_hello, tried, TechLord, Snoopy329