VideoHelp Forum

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or Try ConvertXtoDVD and convert all your movies to DVD. Free trial ! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread
  1. i just downloaded aimp and i noticed it has an option to convert tracks to flac 5.1 surround.

    i backed up my original cds to flac and i was wondering if there is a point or reason for someone to convert his collection of lossless stereo music to 6ch flac.

    and i also want to know if it remains lossless afterwards.
    Quote Quote  
  2. DECEASED
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Heaven
    Search Comp PM
    1) no point

    2) it's not lossless. Stereo to 5.1 means «adding information that did not exist in the source files».
    Quote Quote  
  3. Originally Posted by El Heggunte View Post
    Stereo to 5.1 means «adding information that did not exist in the source files».
    I think from formal perspective this will be more like interpreting information in a different way...
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by pandy
    I think from formal perspective this will be more like interpreting information in a different way...
    Only theoretically, or going something esoteric like Binaural (or Ambisonic UHJ, or to a much lesser extent Dolby Surround/PL/PLII)->Surround.

    Standard Stereo, as it is predominantly currently practiced, DOES NOT CONTAIN the necessary information to describe a full (or near-full) 3-dimensional space. It uses crude approximations of IAD in its panning modules and barely even uses ITD except in special effects, and forget about HRTFs. This weakness is aggravated by the monolithic procedure of using simple stereo speakers to reproduce the encoded stereo signal.

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by Cornucopia View Post
    Originally Posted by pandy
    I think from formal perspective this will be more like interpreting information in a different way...
    Only theoretically, or going something esoteric like Binaural (or Ambisonic UHJ, or to a much lesser extent Dolby Surround/PL/PLII)->Surround.

    Standard Stereo, as it is predominantly currently practiced, DOES NOT CONTAIN the necessary information to describe a full (or near-full) 3-dimensional space. It uses crude approximations of IAD in its panning modules and barely even uses ITD except in special effects, and forget about HRTFs. This weakness is aggravated by the monolithic procedure of using simple stereo speakers to reproduce the encoded stereo signal.

    Scott
    This depends.
    For stereo recordings all is an audio guy and his mixer (i think about multi microphone/track recording - stereo image is created on mixer console), in case multichannel (i.e. surround which is recorded in simialr way as earlier stereo example but goal is to produce multichannel recording) sound there is downmixing of surround to 2 channel (i doubt that any reasonable movie company will create completely independent stereo signal mixing - usually they use well known downmixing matrix).
    As such before stereo it was real multichannel and it was usually downmixed to stereo.

    I'm not arguing how accurately stereo can be processed to recover/recreate information before downmixing - this will be like coloring grayscale movie or restoration mono recordings from beginning of the previous century to stereo but for sure there are some techniques (audio decomposition algorithms) that may provide particular level of objectivity in audio restoration so not everything is only subjective and this was my general idea.
    Last edited by pandy; 17th Jul 2016 at 03:56.
    Quote Quote  
  6. DECEASED
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Heaven
    Search Comp PM
    Okay, to whom this may interest:

    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=105684

    NOTICE, I haven't changed my mind — but if anyone feels like doing some experiments, why not
    Quote Quote  
  7. I must have been fairly bored, because I followed El Heggunte's link and eventually converted a stereo track to 5.1ch, despite knowing surround sound sucks and blows at the same time. I already have foobar2000 and the VST Adaptor ready to go though, so it only took a few minutes, although there's probably no need to re-encode stereo music files as 5.1ch if you use a PC as a media player anyway, because it can be done on playback.
    Foobar2000 can use the same DSPs for either converting or inserting in it's playback chain, and there's obviously no issue up-converting in real time.

    Ironically.... I guess.... I don't have a 5.1ch sound system, due to surround sound sucking and blowing simultaneously.... so I can't listen to the result in surround myself. Someone else will have to tell me how the attached samples sound.

    Following the link in this post I installed the V.I. Suite VST plugin. The installer doesn't seem to do much other than put some files in whatever location you specify, and then it's just a matter of telling foobar2000 where to find VI.dll.
    I've attached the stereo audio and three 5.1ch "up-conversion" samples. The names of the 5.1ch files are taken from the V.I. Suite presets I used when converting. They're AAC. My internet connection is dog slow and for the purpose of the exercise, AAC should do.

    nixiejames,
    Can aimp convert to 5.1ch on playback too or does it need to do it while re-encoding?
    Image Attached Files
    Last edited by hello_hello; 17th Jul 2016 at 11:26.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads