not sure if its called Telecine but i have 55 music videos on my computer i want to compress to x264
they are all ntsc and have lines in them from what i can tell they are all 23.976fps video done to 29.976fps
just wanted to know what would be the best setting i could use in handbreak
i wanted to know because i mostly work with videos that are ether pal or ntsc video that is already 23.976
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
Last edited by jamespoo; 22nd Jun 2016 at 19:21.
-
-
I think Neither one
deinterlace removes Fields
decomb removes misaligned Fields that produce the jaggy 'COMB' effect on moving objects
you want detelecine which changes the frame rate, removing the "frame display duplicate shift count" (best way i can describe it) , used when 23.976 is changed to 29.976 -
None of your definitions are close to accurate.
Handbrake's deinterlace filter doesn't remove any fields. It converts each of the two fields in the frame into its own full-height progressive frame.
Handbrake's decomb filter looks at each pixel of each frame of a video, then only converts the individual fields into separate frames when the frame shows visible amounts of combing. Otherwise, both fields in the frame are used together to create a single progressive frame.
According to Handbrake's documentation, the detelecine filter :looks at every frame of the source video. It visually analyzes the video and looks for fields that can be woven together in ways that form progressive frames. For example, with NTSC hard telecined material, pullup sees that pattern of progressive-progressive-interlaced-interlaced-progressive and that the interlaced frames' fields can be swapped to create frames that show less combing. Each time it encounters that situation, it deinterlaces the frames that need it and makes a guess as to where the "breaks" in the pattern are. This lets it know which frames are the duplicates that should be dropped from a source.Last edited by usually_quiet; 23rd Jun 2016 at 01:29.
-
My guess is the music videos are interlaced and setting the deinterlace filter to "Bob" would be the best bet, to output 59.940fps progressive, or set it to "slower" for 29.970fps progressive, which won't look as smooth, but it's all guesswork. Is this original DVD video (or similar) or something someone else has already re-encoded and potentially made a complete mess of?
If you can't work out the best Handbrake setting, it might pay to upload a sample. -
If the lines come and go in a 2:3 pattern then the source was probably originally "film" and I assume the detelicine filter should give you 23.976fps progressive. If you're seeing the lines in every frame then it's probably interlaced "video" and I'd go with setting the de-interlace filter to Bob instead for 59.940fps progressive.
Handbrake's decomb filter both detelicines and de-interlaces and is designed for DVDs that are a combination of "film" and "video" and will output a variable frame rate.
It's impossible to give specific advice without a sample as it involves a fair degree of crystal ball gazing. -
Unusually quiet
Thank you for the explanation on handbrakes operation
Similar Threads
-
Handbreak - eh hello??
By The.King in forum Video ConversionReplies: 25Last Post: 11th Sep 2015, 06:40 -
Handbreak - Decomb and Detelecine on HD
By rdeffley in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 6Last Post: 18th Jan 2015, 13:30 -
Telecine vs De-Telecine (Handbreak)
By rdeffley in forum DVD RippingReplies: 12Last Post: 5th Jan 2015, 01:58 -
Handbreak Resolution
By TheNewMen in forum Video ConversionReplies: 9Last Post: 28th Feb 2013, 19:53 -
Handbreak/Vidcoder problem
By dfisher052 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 10Last Post: 29th Dec 2012, 00:16