VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 37
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    My 5 year old LG TV is starting to give out. Plus, it plays less and less of the files I throw at it lately.

    So, I was hoping some folks that have bought TV's in the past year that have a good track record of playing these files could post in this thread (with model number).
    Last edited by micallen; 10th Jun 2016 at 12:16.
    _____________________
    Micallen
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search PM
    I am also in the market. Steer clear of new LG models, they don't last long. They don't make them like they use to. I never did switch over to LED, even though it's a dead tech now lol
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member hech54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Yank in Europe
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Ally68 View Post
    Steer clear of new LG models, they don't last long.
    Obviously you have zero experience in this since you:
    Originally Posted by Ally68 View Post
    never did switch over to LED
    Correct?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Some of the TV manufactures have started spying on you and listening to your conversations (via the voice command function) and selling information about what you are watching and discussing to third parties.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/security/2015/11/own-a-vizio-smart-tv-its-watching-you/

    Get a standalone media player and connect it to your TV. Or better yet, put together your own media player with a Raspberry Pi media center kit.

    https://www.amazon.com/Vilros-Raspberry-Complete-Starter-Kit--Black/dp/B00MV6TAJI/
    https://learn.adafruit.com/raspberry-pi-as-a-media-center/overview
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    Some of the TV manufactures have started spying on you and listening to your conversations (via the voice command function) and selling information about what you are watching and discussing to third parties.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/security/2015/11/own-a-vizio-smart-tv-its-watching-you/

    Get a standalone media player and connect it to your TV. Or better yet, put together your own media player with a Raspberry Pi media center kit.
    While I'm new at it, my RasPI with Kodi also won't play a lot of the files I get. It may need an updated codec or something.
    _____________________
    Micallen
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by micallen View Post
    Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    Some of the TV manufactures have started spying on you and listening to your conversations (via the voice command function) and selling information about what you are watching and discussing to third parties.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/security/2015/11/own-a-vizio-smart-tv-its-watching-you/

    Get a standalone media player and connect it to your TV. Or better yet, put together your own media player with a Raspberry Pi media center kit.
    While I'm new at it, my RasPI with Kodi also won't play a lot of the files I get. It may need an updated codec or something.
    You need to buy a license to hardware decode MPEG-2 and VC-1. An H.264 license for hardware decoding is included with the Pi. Software decoding is used for everything else, but the Pi's CPU may struggle with some formats.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    You need to buy a license to hardware decode MPEG-2 and VC-1.
    Kind of ridiculous that VC-1 ($2) decoding is half the price of MPEG2 ($4). While I don't use VC-1 much, it's certainly better.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by KarMa View Post
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    You need to buy a license to hardware decode MPEG-2 and VC-1.
    Kind of ridiculous that VC-1 ($2) decoding is half the price of MPEG2 ($4). While I don't use VC-1 much, it's certainly better.
    ..but MPEG-2 content (DVD and a large amount of TV) is probably more common than than VC-1 content (some Blu-ray releases), so there is more need for an MPEG-2 decoder. The licensing authority sets the price. Demand may or may not play a big role in pricing.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    ..but MPEG-2 content (DVD and a large amount of TV) is probably more common than than VC-1 content (some Blu-ray releases), so there is more need for an MPEG-2 decoder. The licensing authority sets the price. Demand may or may not play a big role in pricing.
    Agreed, there's not much VC-1 content vs MPEG2. Mostly just earlier Bluray releases, before professional bluray encoders moved more toward H.264. Also a certain segment of internet videos before H.264 dominated.

    Just pointing out that more expensive does not always mean better.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by KarMa View Post
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    ..but MPEG-2 content (DVD and a large amount of TV) is probably more common than than VC-1 content (some Blu-ray releases), so there is more need for an MPEG-2 decoder. The licensing authority sets the price. Demand may or may not play a big role in pricing.
    Agreed, there's not much VC-1 content vs MPEG2. Mostly just earlier Bluray releases, before professional bluray encoders moved more toward H.264. Also a certain segment of internet videos before H.264 dominated.

    Just pointing out that more expensive does not always mean better.
    So what. If someone has MPEG-2 content and wants to watch it using their Pi without re-encoding it first, neither an H.264 decoder or a VC-1 decoder is of any use them. Have you been intellectually contaminated by spending time in a Stears555 thread? LOL
    Quote Quote  
  11. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    So what. If someone has MPEG-2 content and wants to watch it using their Pi without re-encoding it first, neither an H.264 decoder or a VC-1 decoder is of any use them. Have you been intellectually contaminated by spending time in a Stears555 thread? LOL
    There seems to be a misunderstanding. If I had lots MPEG2 content to watch, I'd just pay the fee and keep it as is. Re-encoding it to H.264 or VC-1 would just cause a loss and take CPU time to encode. No real benefit.

    Just find it crazy that MPEG can still charge what they do to decode an ancient standard. Nearly all of MPEG2s patents have run out but they still charge the same. But they can and the market seems to accept it. A more extreme example would be the prices for TI calculators.

    https://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instruments-TI-83-Graphing-Calculator/dp/B00001N2QU

    I payed the same price for the above calculator 15 years ago.
    Quote Quote  
  12. As I understand it, the RPi 3 can play MPEG 2 video up to 1080p with software decoding just fine. And it supports h.265/HEVC up to 1080p30. You might need recent beta software though.

    In any case, whatever the OP gets, it won't play everything. Nothing plays everything. And if you somehow found a player that plays everything today, tomorrow a new video or audio codec will come out and it will no longer play everything.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by KarMa View Post
    There seems to be a misunderstanding. If I had lots MPEG2 content to watch, I'd just pay the fee and keep it as is. Re-encoding it to H.264 or VC-1 would just cause a loss and take CPU time to encode. No real benefit.

    Just find it crazy that MPEG can still charge what they do to decode an ancient standard. Nearly all of MPEG2s patents have run out but they still charge the same. But they can and the market seems to accept it. A more extreme example would be the prices for TI calculators.

    https://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instruments-TI-83-Graphing-Calculator/dp/B00001N2QU

    I payed the same price for the above calculator 15 years ago.
    Things cost what they cost. We can either pay or do without. It is up to the OP to decide if $4 is a fair price to pay for better MPEG-2 playback, assuming he has an older Pi that needs to decode with hardware.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Looked up the royalties for decoding MPEG2, and it seems like it recently dropped.

    On January 1, 2002 it dropped from $4 to $2.50, and then on January 1, 2010 it dropped to $2. January 1, 2016 says it should be $0.50, and after January 1, 2018 it can be $0.35.

    Assuming I read this right. http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/M2/Pages/Agreement.aspx
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by KarMa View Post
    Looked up the royalties for decoding MPEG2, and it seems like it recently dropped.

    On January 1, 2002 it dropped from $4 to $2.50, and then on January 1, 2010 it dropped to $2. January 1, 2016 says it should be $0.50, and after January 1, 2018 it can be $0.35.

    Assuming I read this right. http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/M2/Pages/Agreement.aspx
    The license key needs to be purchased from the Raspberry Pi Store. I thought you had checked, but apparently not. The Raspberry Pi Store charges £2.40. ($3.42 at the current exchange rate) The one-time fee is nominal regardless. Most family restaurants charge more for a slice of pie.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    if you want 'Pi' pay the price for mpeg2
    or buy a Media Player for $49 that will play almost anything and has mpeg2 support built in

    you asked about Tv's that play MKV
    they aren't widely available
    a new TV is a lot more $$ than a $4 license fee

    it really Not worth the time and effort to Quibble about it
    Quote Quote  
  17. I'm a Super Moderator johns0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    canada
    Search Comp PM
    My mom's 2013 46" Samsung TV plays any mkv,mp4,avi and mpeg that plug in the usb,it's not that the video files are getting any better or advanced it's just that they need to be within the specs and that means no head shrinking,5.1 profiles or variable frame rates and subtitles that are out of spec.
    I think,therefore i am a hamster.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by hech54 View Post
    Originally Posted by Ally68 View Post
    Steer clear of new LG models, they don't last long.
    Obviously you have zero experience in this since you:
    Originally Posted by Ally68 View Post
    never did switch over to LED
    Correct?
    Incorrect
    LCD to LED was never really an upgrade
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Led is still an LCD TV
    The change is in the light source
    The first LCD TVs used florescent light tubes
    Then LED light source
    Then really large sets used mirrored reflected light DLP?
    THEN CAME edge lit led lighting using fiber optics to place the light behind the LCD panel
    This is when TV's became really thin
    Everyone is still and LCD panel TV the edge lit fiber optic
    It's what makes the high contrast deep blacks possessible
    By eliminating light bleed over between adjoining pixels
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Ally68 View Post
    LCD to LED was never really an upgrade
    It depends on how you define "upgrade". In general, a TV which uses LEDs for back lighting has a thinner bezel, weighs less, uses less electricity, and runs cooler than a TV which uses fluorescent back lighting. If someone buys an LED TV which uses a quantum dot film to diffuse the back light, the color range will be improved considerably. Samsung calls it "Nano-Crystal Color".
    Quote Quote  
  21. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by theewizard View Post
    if you want 'Pi' pay the price for mpeg2
    or buy a Media Player for $49 that will play almost anything and has mpeg2 support built in

    you asked about Tv's that play MKV
    they aren't widely available
    a new TV is a lot more $$ than a $4 license fee

    it really Not worth the time and effort to Quibble about it
    My TV is going out. That's the original point. So I need a TV. Hoping whatever I get will play a good percentage of file types.
    _____________________
    Micallen
    Quote Quote  
  22. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    And that's what I mean
    Why the quibbling discussion of $4 MPEG license, if you are shopping for a new TV
    Which ever one you buy it won't play everything
    The problem with mkv is it too open, too lienate , you can put anything in it
    And that audio and video may not match the specs for the TV decoding

    Me I would choose a reasonable priced TV with a picture I like, multiple HDMI ports etc...
    And then add a multi media player, connected via HDMI
    I would not be overly concerned about what the TV can play via USB
    I have four ways to play video files via devices connected to the TV by HDMI
    PC, Sony media player, PVR, and via playback thru DVD/BD player USB input
    Last edited by theewizard; 13th Jun 2016 at 12:00.
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by micallen View Post
    Originally Posted by theewizard View Post
    if you want 'Pi' pay the price for mpeg2
    or buy a Media Player for $49 that will play almost anything and has mpeg2 support built in

    you asked about Tv's that play MKV
    they aren't widely available
    a new TV is a lot more $$ than a $4 license fee

    it really Not worth the time and effort to Quibble about it
    My TV is going out. That's the original point. So I need a TV. Hoping whatever I get will play a good percentage of file types.
    I helped my mother pick out a new TV last year. A media player was not a consideration in the selection process, but after we brought it home and I set it up for Mom, I found out that the small, inexpensive Samsung smart TV she bought happened to have a fairly competent media player. The file and format compatibility for the media player were spelled out in a fair amount of detail in the owner's manual. Unless a TV has just been released, most of the time the owners manual can be located online.

    Mom's TV also collected data and supplied targeted pop-up ads, until I turned off the features responsible for that.
    Quote Quote  
  24. My Samsung 55" playes AVI, MKV, MP4, MTS
    YMMV
    Quote Quote  
  25. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I'm not disputing that some TVs will play some mkv files
    As long as the video and audio match the specs, and most likely this specs are the same as the mp4 specs
    But will it play files with out of spec aspect ratio , to high a bit rate, files that are HEVC instead h264,
    You can stick anything in an mkv , mp4, mpeg2 are more constrained/controlled
    Quote Quote  
  26. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by theewizard View Post
    And that's what I mean
    Why the quibbling discussion of $4 MPEG license, if you are shopping for a new TV
    Which ever one you buy it won't play everything
    The problem with mkv is it if too open, too lienate , you can put anything in it
    And that audio and video may not match the specs for the TV decoding
    The OP, micallen, asked about TV media players first and later asked a question about a problem with media playback on his Raspberry Pi, running Kodi. micallen has so far said nothing about the Raspberry Pi's MPEG-2 decoder license fee being too high. That was all KarMa.
    Quote Quote  
  27. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by theewizard View Post
    I'm not disputing that some TVs will play some mkv files
    As long as the video and audio match the specs, and most likely this specs are the same as the mp4 specs
    But will it play files with out of spec aspect ratio , to high a bit rate, files that are HEVC instead h264,
    You can stick anything in an mkv , mp4, mpeg2 are more constrained/controlled
    Mom's TV plays HEVC video and AAC audio in an MKV container. I tested it with a legal download of Sintel, which is 1920x824 and 2:35:1 aspect ratio. Will it play everything? No. No hardware-based media player will play everything. Even stand alone Android media players running Kodi can be limited by their CPU. ...but there is no question that TV media players are getting better.
    Quote Quote  
  28. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    My LG TV would play about 98% of what I tried in the beginning, Now it's more like 10%.
    As a stop-gap, I've tried streaming via PlayOn (just starting experimenting with that) to my Dish Hopper receiver, but that is hit and miss.

    It's nice to have the media player as part of the TV. It makes it easier. And neater.
    _____________________
    Micallen
    Quote Quote  
  29. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Moralez View Post
    My Samsung 55" playes AVI, MKV, MP4, MTS
    YMMV
    What's the model # of the TV ?
    _____________________
    Micallen
    Quote Quote  
  30. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Moralez View Post
    My Samsung 55" playes AVI, MKV, MP4, MTS
    YMMV
    AVI and MKV are containers and can contain many different types of video files, many of which are incompatible with built-in media players (there are numerous threads about this).

    The best advice has already been given, get a separate media player and you'll get a much higher level of playback compatibility and value. A built-in media HDTV media player is analogous to an OEM stereo in a car. The cost to the manufacturer is minimal, but they'll tack on the full retail price to car. Better to save the additional $50-$100 retail cost on the HDTV and get a good separate media player.

    Also, since you're already trying streaming (PlayOn), I'd suggest Plex or Mezzmo (both free for the basic edition) and set it to transcode your stream for greatest compatibility.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!