I've been ripping all my blurays with only the 5.1 track. I primarily play these files on a stereo setup so the surround sound track is being mixed together via software then played over my speakers. For my stereo setup would it be better to have the original steroe mix that comes with the bluray? And also have the surround sound track to still have the option when I play them on a home theater setup?
Or would the quality of the stereo mix be far worse than the DTS 5.1 mixed down since the surround sound track is closer to the master?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Some mastering engineers & audiophile purists would say that a pre-mix down to stereo from 5.1 would be noticeably more optimized (esp. better with placement & EQ balance) than the auto-mixdown that is done upon playback of 5.1 into 2.0 systems.
Me, there may have been a handful of titles where I could tell the difference, but most I cannot. IOW, the auto mixdown is good enough.
You, depends on how discerning & picky you are.
I doubt if the stereo version (on a stereo system) would ever be WORSE.
ScottLast edited by Cornucopia; 8th Sep 2015 at 10:38.
-
I figured that would be the case. I might keep the 2.0 track mainly as a completionist thing. Thank you
Similar Threads
-
Surround channel downmixing to stereo in movie rips - why?
By smokeluvr1971 in forum AudioReplies: 5Last Post: 14th May 2014, 18:30 -
How to create a dubbed track with stereo language and 5.1 Original track
By BRFan in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 5Last Post: 30th Jul 2013, 16:56 -
What's wrong with this surround-sound audio track?
By Mephesto in forum AudioReplies: 11Last Post: 5th Feb 2013, 03:13 -
stereo downmix: surround vs surround 2
By codemaster in forum AudioReplies: 7Last Post: 29th Aug 2012, 11:06 -
PC Audio: Stereo to Pseudo-Surround Software
By Salem874 in forum AudioReplies: 0Last Post: 22nd Feb 2011, 14:31