VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. hey im using TMPG enc, i put it on the best quality when converting from divx to mpeg-1, it takes about 18hrs for 1/2 a movie, i changed the priority settings and put it on highest priority now it takes about 10hrs for 1/2 a movie, it uses 100% cpu usage (1300MHZ) but is only using 24 out of my 384 rdram, does anyone know how to make it use more ram and go faster?
    Quote Quote  
  2. As far as i know Ram wont help to decrease encoding time. The only what to do it is to either overclock your CPU (which wont even decrease it by much), or just get a better one (one that isnt intel). Also, you best to throw out your RDRAM its junk
    Quote Quote  
  3. its all i got right now and my computer is decent enough
    Quote Quote  
  4. hi,

    no RDRAM does not suck. I have a P4 1.3 512 RDRAM Asus Mother board m/c. i use DVDx and CCE 2.5 sp . it gets me the Job done in real time. it 1 hr mive in 1hr. I have also tried CCE 2,5 with DVDavi one pass vbr. which gave me a very good result almost in the real time for the vedio only and then i mux the audio which i get it from vob2audio takes 10 min.
    Baskaran Swamiappan
    Englewood,CO
    baskis@gmail.com
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD USA
    Search Comp PM
    Encode your video overnight and on through the next work day, so there's no perceived loss of time. When you're busy doing other things, the psychological time "decreases."

    Also, accept some video degradation as a trade-off to encoding time. Laying off some of those "best" settings will give you similar encoding results in half the time.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Hippo, your PC is fine. There are people who, if asked for advice on the problem of a car running a bit rough, would say, "drive it off a cliff, it sucks". Very helpful...some advice is worth what you pay for it - nothing.

    More RAM won't help appreciably. More CPU would (most encoding tasks are almost totally CPU dependent), but it's possible that your project settings (filters, motion estimation, etc) are responsible for a lot of this encoding time. Where do you have the motion estimation set in TMPGEnc?
    As Churchill famously predicted when Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming peace in his time: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war."
    Quote Quote  
  7. I set motion Estimate on Highest Quality (very slow), i dont want to change my settings, just the time it takes, but doesnt seem like i can so Thnx anyways ppl :)
    Quote Quote  
  8. no RDRAM does not suck

    Well, it sucks when it comes time to upgrade. performance is pretty good though, HOWEVER that shouldnt really help with encoding.
    Quote Quote  
  9. You'll save a good bit of time by taking your motion estimation down a notch to (merely) high. If you can tell the difference, you've got much better eyes (or a much larger TV) than I.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Yes, it takes %20 longer on highest quality, rather than high, and the difference it not noticeable by human eyes. Do that.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Extract the audio from the DivX to WAV with Virtual Dub and use that as audio source in TMPGEnc. It reduces the encode time a great deal.
    Quote Quote  
  12. i do that, but thnx anyways
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Search PM
    I'm sorry fellas, but rdram is mad nice. I only have 256mb and it out performs my 320mb sdram big time. Anyway, back to the original question, I found out from encoding with several different processors and dual processors that AMD athlons are the way to go. They handle multimedia way better than pentium and don't cost as much. I bought an Athlon XP 1700 (1.47 ghz) ($175 with the board), and it encodes my divx to mpeg-2 in about 3-4 hours when it is on the highest quality. If I lower the settings, i'm at around 2-2 1/2 hours. I'm scared of how the athlon 2+ ghz performs!!
    Quote Quote  
  14. Can't wait to build my dual 2100 xp Oh I can't wait till I graduate :P
    Quote Quote  
  15. in my experience, intel p4s have always kicked ass on amd when it comes to encoding. if only i could get a nice dual p4 2.4ghz system... would mean i could decode and reencode a dvd on highest quality (720x576@25fps, best vbr, highest motion search precision, floating point, a little bit of noise filtering, etc, etc) and it might get done under real time. better than the god damn 12 days it takes for my p2 350@392.
    Quote Quote  
  16. Member shardison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    California
    Search Comp PM
    Beg, buy, or borrow another 600MH or better computer or three (no monitor needed) and encode the movie in 2 or three sections (a section on each computer) and join them later. Even a slow computer might take twice as long as a new fast computer, but 6 cheap, slow computers will kick 1 fast computer in the butt. Of course the room they are in will get hot and your electric bill will go up. But you will encode faster.
    Quote Quote  
  17. You want fast, buy a DVD-RAM Recorder, record stright to DVD-R in real time, your time only takes as long as the movie and you end up with DVD-R.

    Bud
    Quote Quote  
  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Great advice. I have a spare 800MHz P3 (384 MB PC-133) laying around, enough spare parts to build a 1GHz Duron (256 or 384MB, depending on what I have, and I need a case & power supply) and an unused 10/100 hub to suppliment my current 1.4 GHz P4 (768MB RDRAM)

    Anyone got a spare case, power supply, and a couple 100 or 10/100 nic to donate?

    PS I'm not worried about electric bill. All 3 PC plus 2 LCD monitors wouldn't draw more than my 9 year old laser printer. I'd just have to leave my printer off most of the time, and to give up air conditioner this summer. All I ask is for cooler than normal summer.
    Quote Quote  
  19. Depending on how you are doing it... If you are frameserving from VDub, try using some of the filters available in Vdub instead of TMPGenc. Some VDub filters are really optimized for speed.

    Avoid the 2D Cleaner if possible. That filter increases encoding time like crazy.

    Or try AVIsynth for some filters. Some of those are lightning fast.


    Darryl
    Quote Quote  
  20. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    australia,brisbane
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by TheHippo
    hey im using TMPG enc, i put it on the best quality when converting from divx to mpeg-1, it takes about 18hrs for 1/2 a movie, i changed the priority settings and put it on highest priority now it takes about 10hrs for 1/2 a movie, it uses 100% cpu usage (1300MHZ) but is only using 24 out of my 384 rdram, does anyone know how to make it use more ram and go faster?
    your unit should encode a full movie of say 1hr 30 min in max 3hr 15min
    Quote Quote  
  21. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    australia,brisbane
    Search Comp PM
    todays first step to not to confuse you is your hard dirve configured to ultra ata 100
    go to http://support.intel.com/sites/support/index.htm
    and get knew busmaster drivers and ata 100 accelerator drivers
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!