VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 42 of 42
  1. Encore is for authoring BD and DVD.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Originally Posted by jagabo View Post
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    I looked at two screen shots and honestly couldn't tell the difference.
    Try with this video.
    Is that some telecined video with a 2:3 cadence? I have no experience with that sort of video. All my video is video I shot myself. And I never use 24p even though I could. I supposed I could generate some line grid in AE to test it out. But since I had to drop down to 1280x720 and can't think of an alternative method of resizing, there is not much point anymore. Although it would be interesting to see if there is a difference.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    Encore is for authoring BD and DVD.
    You can't feed 1080p60 on a video BD or video DVD.

    You must convert it first and Encore is not the tool you would want to use.

    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    there is not much point anymore
    Try resizing to 720x540 or 640x480 before upscaling to 1440x1080 or 1280x720. You'll find severe artifacts. The patterns are chosen specifically to show that it can't be done cleanly but you will find similar patterns in a lot of real world video. Blinds in a window, the pattern on the size of a skyscraper in the distance, etc.

    Code:
    Spline36Resize(720,540)
    nnedi3_rpow2(2, cshift="Spline36Resize", fwidth=1440, fheight=1080)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	2step.png
Views:	185
Size:	71.9 KB
ID:	32389

    But you can resize directly to 1440x1080 without severe artifacts.

    Code:
    nnedi3_rpow2(2, cshift="Spline36Resize", fwidth=1440, fheight=1080)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	1step.png
Views:	181
Size:	68.0 KB
ID:	32390

    Be sure to view the images at their original size.
    Last edited by jagabo; 2nd Jul 2015 at 22:32.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    You can't feed 1080p60 on a video BD or video DVD.
    Not true. Do you have Encore? Try it. That is what the fake interlace flag is for. Doesn't even trigger the Transcode flag. I just finished authoring a blu-ray in 1920x1080p60. I just found that Encore is sluggish and since I am scaling up SD video, the cost outweigh the "benefits".

    Jagabo, thanks for the post. I can see what you mean by artifacts in the top left quadrant of the top image. I am surprised that resizing to square pixels then doubling introduces artifacts while doubling then resizing to square pixels does not. But, that is why I keep coming back to this forum. So much to learn about video.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member Skiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    Not true. Do you have Encore? Try it. That is what the fake interlace flag is for.
    "Fake interlace" means you have a 1080i (or 576i/480i) stream on BD which contains so called "progressive segmented frames" (PsF). However, since the frame rate is of course 25/29.97 interlaced you still cannot put 50p/60p on BD, except for 720p. PsF means you have a progressive video of 25 or 29.97 fps and encode it as if it were interlaced.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    You can't feed 1080p60 on a video BD or video DVD.
    Not true. Do you have Encore? Try it. That is what the fake interlace flag is for. Doesn't even trigger the Transcode flag. I just finished authoring a blu-ray in 1920x1080p60. I just found that Encore is sluggish and since I am scaling up SD video, the cost outweigh the "benefits".
    I have read about flagging 1080p29.976/1080p30 video as interlaced for Blu-Ray, where each frame is delivered as 2 simultaneous fields. Although the number of fields per second that created was within the spec, some old players supposedly had trouble with it.

    Flagged as interlaced, 1080p59.94/1080p60 would create twice as many fields as the spec permits, and is likely not to play correctly on some players.

    Skiller beat me!
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    Skiller beat me!
    LOL, funny watching people fall over each other to be the first to point out something wrong.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    LOL, funny watching people fall over each other to be the first to point out something wrong.
    LOL, funny watching people claim to have done the impossible.

    https://www.videohelp.com/hd
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    Skiller beat me!
    LOL, funny watching people fall over each other to be the first to point out something wrong.
    LOL It's a joke. It's more about being unintentionally repetitive. No current members here that I am aware of actually care who is first.

    It is true that some would care if someone claims to have done something that no Blu-Ray authoring program should accept.
    Quote Quote  
  11. U should see what I do on BD. It would blow ur minds!
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by SameSelf View Post
    U should see what I do on BD. It would blow ur minds!
    I doubt it. Someone can do anything they want with media files burned as data on BD.

    You mentioned using Encore. As Blu-Ray authoring software, Encore should follow the spec and either reject or convert 1080p60 video even it it is flagged as interlaced.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!