I just finished building my workstation and was very disappointed to get very low scores in RealBench and Unigine Valley. My graphics card was initially in the PCI-E 2.0 slot on my X99 Pro mobo, but then I switched it to a PCI-E 3.0 slot and got literally double the scores. Is this difference normal between PCI-E 2.0 vs 3.0? I'm wondering if maybe something is faulty.
Unigine Valley Score using PCI-E 2.0: 1294
Unigine Valley Score using PCI-E 3.0: 2456
My realbench score using PCI-E 2.0:
Image Editing: 79808
Time: 107.507
Encoding: 111448
Time: 107.565
OpenCL: 60660
KSamples/sec: 1462
Heavy Multitasking: 64760
Time: 151.019
System Score: 67037
After switching to 3.0 my Heavy Multitasking time dropped to 93seconds!!
PCPartPicker part list: http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/jhCnrH
CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K 3.3GHz 6-Core Processor
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 82.5 CFM CPU Cooler
Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard
Memory: Crucial 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-2133 Memory
Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive
Storage: Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Storage: Western Digital BLACK SERIES 2TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
Video Card: EVGA GeForce GTX 970 4GB SSC ACX 2.0 Video Card
Case: Fractal Design Define R5 (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: XFX XTR 750W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 (OEM) (64-bit)
Case Fan: Noctua NF-A14 PWM 82.5 CFM 140mm Fan
Monitor: Dell U2515H 60Hz 25.0" Monitor
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
-
Check the manual. That will tell you the limitations on the expansion slots. For example if they share bandwidth with other expansion slots and other connections on the board, or use fewer lanes.
The manual for the X99 Pro says the following:1 x PCI Express 2.0 x16 slot*** (max. at x4 mode, compatible with PCIe x1 and PCIe x4 devices)
[Edit]There is usually one video card slot that is supposed to be populated first. Additional x16 slots are usually intended to be used for SLI or crossfire.Last edited by usually_quiet; 10th May 2015 at 09:09. Reason: correction
-
Thanks for that information! I'm really new to this so learning all the time. If you could answer one more question... The manual says;
The PCIe x16_3 slot supports x8 devices only -
In my post above, I wrote "There is usually one video card slot that is supposed to be populated first." Chapter one page 14 (1-14) in the PDF version of the manual provides ASUS's recommendations for installing VGA cards. According to those, you shouldn't be using the PCIe x16_3 slot unless you have two video cards installed. If you have only one video card installed, it should be in the PCIe x16_1 slot
As you saw, the PCIe x16_3 operates as a x8 slot rather than an x16 slot. While x8 might not significantly decrease the performance of some less powerful video cards, I would think that you would want a GTX 970 in the slot that provides the best possible performance.Last edited by usually_quiet; 10th May 2015 at 12:45. Reason: grammar
-
It definitely should be in the first slot as recommended by the manual.
Similar Threads
-
MPC poor performance in Win7
By Apexi in forum Software PlayingReplies: 10Last Post: 16th Oct 2013, 12:42 -
SD Card slot
By Kevvy in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 14Last Post: 31st Jan 2013, 12:21 -
Poor performance playing 1080p on my computer
By juarez in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 12Last Post: 11th Jul 2012, 15:43 -
PCI Express Card Adaptor for laptop without a slot
By OldMedia in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 13th Jun 2012, 14:30 -
Very poor performance on ATi 650 USB PLZ HELP
By Marto2008 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 12Last Post: 16th Jun 2010, 18:54