VideoHelp Forum

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or Try ConvertXtoDVD and convert all your movies to DVD. Free trial ! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread
  1. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Introducing the Intel 750 Series SSDPEDMW400G4R5 HHHL (CEM2.0) 400GB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

    Performance:

    Max Sequential Read 2200 MB/s
    Max Sequential Write 900 MB/s
    4KB Random Read 430000 IOPS
    4KB Random Write 230000 IOPS
    Read Latency 20 µs
    Write Latency 20 µs
    MTBF 1,200,000 hours

    The numbers speak for themselves!



    $400 for 400GB!

    You need an X99 with adapter to get this to work with your computer.

    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    QUÉBEC
    Search Comp PM
    what are the real speed number for a pci-e ssd ? my 2 ssd in raid0 benchmark at more than 1000 mb/s but in reality i can only write/read at 300 /400 max.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by imhh1 View Post
    ..in reality i can only write/read at 300 /400 max.
    How did you test it?

    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    QUÉBEC
    Search Comp PM
    I simply copy and paste a huge file. i get 200 mb/s max (so 400 total R/W)
    Quote Quote  
  5. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by imhh1 View Post
    I simply copy and paste a huge file. i get 200 mb/s max (so 400 total R/W)
    Copy and paste from where?

    If you want to test this properly you obviously should use a ram disk.

    Quote Quote  
  6. Nobody buys a SSD like this one and uses it for file copying. So I don't know why you are asking that ?

    But if you're still interested, look at some hardware benchmarks that have real life tests, like copying "z" quantity of files of "x" MB filesize, not synthetic benchmarks.

    eg. look at the file copy test 10@1000MB would probably be close to what you are interested in for large file transfers
    http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Storage/PCIe-SSD-Roundup-Samsung-SM951-NVMe-vs-AHCI-XP941...uential-Perfor
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    If the numbers speak for themselves, then why are YOU having to post this?

    Scott

    (it does sound good though)
    Quote Quote  
  8. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Cornucopia View Post
    If the numbers speak for themselves, then why are YOU having to post this?
    I am without reply....

    Quote Quote  
  9. Rancid User ron spencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ish-ka-bibble
    Search Comp PM
    what is price...what is for?
    'Do I look absolutely divine and regal, and yet at the same time very pretty and rather accessible?' - Queenie
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    San Francisco
    Search Comp PM
    Just curious, your MTBF (mean time between failures) is something akin to "average" that only math geeks truly understand.
    .
    But I can calculate 1,200,000 / (24 * 365.25) = 136.89 years running continuously.
    .
    How on earth do such numbers come to be? they ran 1,200,000 video cards and 137 failed after one hour?
    .
    pcG
    Quote Quote  
  11. http://www.ssdreview.com/review/compare/intel-750-series-1200gb-pci-e-0135/crystaldiskbenchmark.html

    Whole new level my ass. Random 4K read: 44 MB/s. Just slightly faster than my 35 MB/s "old-school" SSD.
    The numbers sure speak for themselves alright.
    Save yourself the embarrassment in the future by not fantasizing prior to its release.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by -Habanero- View Post
    http://www.ssdreview.com/review/compare/intel-750-series-1200gb-pci-e-0135/crystaldiskbenchmark.html

    Whole new level my ass. Random 4K read: 44 MB/s. Just slightly faster than my 35 MB/s "old-school" SSD.
    The numbers sure speak for themselves alright.
    Save yourself the embarrassment in the future by not fantasizing prior to its release.
    I'd say the single thread Crystal Disk benchmark you selected (perhaps intentionally?) is garbage.

    Just use the website you refer to and compare with any SSD and the difference is obvious.

    Once I get the adapter for my MSI board this thing definitely is on my list.

    Last edited by newpball; 11th Jul 2015 at 11:06.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    I'd say the single thread Crystal Disk benchmark you selected (perhaps intentionally?) is garbage.
    Right because we all own servers where high queue depths are commonplace. Consumer SSDs will rarely use a queue depth higher than 1 or 2.
    You must always assume worst case scenario.

    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    Just use the website you refer to and compare with any SSD and the difference is obvious.
    I see a difference, just not as huge as the one that gave you such a hard-on 2 months ago.

    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    Once I get the adapter for my MSI board this thing definitely is on my list.
    Your business, not ours.
    Quote Quote  
  14. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by -Habanero- View Post
    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    I'd say the single thread Crystal Disk benchmark you selected (perhaps intentionally?) is garbage.
    Right because we all own servers where high queue depths are commonplace. Consumer SSDs will rarely use a queue depth higher than 1 or 2.
    You must always assume worst case scenario.

    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    Just use the website you refer to and compare with any SSD and the difference is obvious.
    I see a difference, just not as huge as the one that gave you such a hard-on 2 months ago.

    Originally Posted by newpball View Post
    Once I get the adapter for my MSI board this thing definitely is on my list.
    Your business, not ours.
    Not sure what you are arguing about, if you don't like it then don't buy it!

    What's next, new technology ideas should not be posted in the computer forum because you (or your royal "we") don't need it?

    Quote Quote  
  15. I think it's pretty clear.

    You: SSDs just got to another level! Look at all these amazing, biased, outright misleading and deceitful numbers from the company's website that mean practically nothing!
    Me: 25% faster random read speed is a whole new level?
    You: Your benchmark is garbage because it tests single-thread reads.
    Me: 99% of consumer operations are single-thread RW.
    You: DURRRR I don't understand!

    Why it's useless to argue with trolls...
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads