Hey all,
I am doing some encodes to BD9 and I am still seeing a tiny amount of posterization if I stick my face in the monitor and scrutinize it closely. I know that hardware-accelerated encoding is a no-no if I am after quality.
I am curious if hardware-accelerated decoding also has an effect on the resulting video quality. Or could it just be that I'm reducing the bitrate way too much with BD9 size? Perhaps BD9 isn't the way to go and I should use BD25?
I really don't notice any of the posterization if I am not really looking closely into my monitor, but upon close inspection, it's definitely there.
Thanks.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
What do you shrink with? BD-Rebuilder ?
But how often do you stick your face in the monitor when watching movies.... -
If the decode is standard conform it should produce exact same output as any other decoder.
Decoder output should only differ regarding post-processing. (resizing, dithering, color changes)
-> it shouldn't matter whether the decoder is software or hardware basedusers currently on my ignore list: deadrats, Stears555, marcorocchini
Similar Threads
-
webm vp9 hardware decoding in html5 players
By codemaster in forum Software PlayingReplies: 3Last Post: 30th Jun 2016, 21:35 -
The newest LAV filters has hardware HEVC decoding support.
By Stears555 in forum Software PlayingReplies: 13Last Post: 1st Oct 2014, 17:27 -
Does packaging format of videos affect rendering quality?
By MarcMiller in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 6Last Post: 1st Nov 2011, 16:27 -
Urgent Help needed: all video converters corrupt my mp4 files, accelerating
By marilia05 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 6th Apr 2011, 05:50 -
Does using AviSynth affect quality?
By FrozenInferno in forum EditingReplies: 8Last Post: 27th Feb 2011, 11:41