VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5
FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 121 to 135 of 135
Thread
  1. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Looking more and more like an intra compressor, or maybe something like FFV1. 240 Mbps lol, mind your step.


    Tveon claims 4K streams at under 2 Mbps
    http://www.rethinkresearch.biz/articles/tveon-claims-4k-streams-at-under-2-mbps/
    ^New kid on the block
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=172044

    We know what it is. It's advanced ascii art written on top of a low bitrate video stream.
    Quote Quote  
  3. 240 Mbps lol
    This was a test for Contribution of "lossless" Ultra HD feed from the stadium to Telefonica’s Movistar+ and Canal+ stations .
    Current technology at least need 1 Gbps bandwidth for lossless Contribution of Ultra HD.

    Tveon claims 4K streams at under 2 Mbps
    http://www.rethinkresearch.biz/articles/tveon-claims-4k-streams-at-under-2-mbps/
    ^New kid on the block

    There are alot of claims out there but they are just a claim without any third party evaluation or serious evidence to support their claims. This is another example.

    A new approach to condensing data leads to a 99% compression rate
    http://www.theserverside.com/feature/Has-a-New-York-startup-achieved-a-99-compression-rate
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXxjNK3fedc
    http://xlabsai.com/
    Quote Quote  
  4. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by david55 View Post
    This was a test for Contribution of "lossless" Ultra HD feed from the stadium to Telefonica’s Movistar+ and Canal+ stations .
    Current technology at least need 1 Gbps bandwidth for lossless Contribution of Ultra HD.
    I knew it was lossless when I made my previous post, why I also mentioned FFV1. And lossless is pretty hard to compress, so 240Mbps for 4K is understandable. But considering the name of this thread ("V-Nova a new video codec 50% more efficient than hevc"), this is another ridiculous test and gives little credit to their bigger claim of being better than HEVC. We also don't know the color space they are talking about, leaving us unable to make any comparison. What does this "lossless Contribution of Ultra HD" equate in color space?

    Originally Posted by david55 View Post
    There are alot of claims out there but they are just a claim without any third party evaluation or serious evidence to support their claims.
    The only public evaluation I've seen says that it's better than JPEG2000 intra video and close to but not as good as H.264 intra. All the other companies just give V-NOVA a pat on the back publicly to rustle HEVC's jimmies.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by ndjamena View Post
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=172044

    We know what it is. It's advanced ascii art written on top of a low bitrate video stream.

    Ultra rare pepe for you


    Please try hard to ignore most of the trolling there; Stears555 is already on several ignore lists.
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1741798#post1741798
    epic
    Last edited by KarMa; 23rd Nov 2015 at 17:59.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    All jokes aside, THAT ^^^^^^ is the general idea.

    Remove all the non-display ascii characters, modify the rest so that they don't look like letters and are optimised to mimic video details instead, add a few extra commands to stack or blend or whatever, then write it all over a low bitrate h.264 or h.265 stream and viola, the underlying stream takes care of the gradients, Perseus takes care of the details.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM

    https://forum.videohelp.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=31520&d=1430752717

    Ok, so I missed this the first time around. I think it really is intra-only, considering they list it twice. So they have an intra-only codec that is worse than H.264 intra.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kazakhstan
    Search Comp PM
    Hi! An interesting so the nebula around this encoder. At what stage of the project?
    Quote Quote  
  9. Informitv validates V-Nova PERSEUS video compression performance

    Visually lossless 4K /UHD contribution download report

    Supports High Dynamic Range video download report

    Already capable of 8K image compression download report

    http://www.rapidtvnews.com


    http://www.sportsvideo.org


    http://informitv.com
    Last edited by david55; 18th Apr 2016 at 04:36.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Sky Italia deploys PERSEUS compression for IPTV

    http://www.v-net.tv

    https://www.abcbourse.com

    http://finance.yahoo.com
    Last edited by david55; 19th Apr 2016 at 06:43.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Dinosaur Supervisor KarMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    US
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by ndjamena View Post
    All jokes aside, THAT ^^^^^^ is the general idea.

    Remove all the non-display ascii characters, modify the rest so that they don't look like letters and are optimised to mimic video details instead, add a few extra commands to stack or blend or whatever, then write it all over a low bitrate h.264 or h.265 stream and viola, the underlying stream takes care of the gradients, Perseus takes care of the details.
    Looks like you were right but I still don't know where you were getting that info. According to streamingmedia.com, they use a low bitrate H.264 video as their base and then Perseus fills in the rest. With the goal of giving better efficiency compared to normal H.264.

    http://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/Review-V-Nova-Perse...pe-111816.aspx

    The author of this article seems to think MP4 and H.264 are one in the same, while H.265 is something entirely different. Which is troubling.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kazakhstan
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!