VideoHelp Forum

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or Try ConvertXtoDVD and convert all your movies to DVD. Free trial ! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread
  1. Assume I want to rip/re-encode a Blue-Ray movie to a smaller video file (e.g. *.mkv or *.mp4).

    The original movie has a resolution of something about 2560 * 1440.

    I decide that a target bitrate of 2000 kbps should be sufficient for resulting video.

    Ok so far.

    Now I wonder which target resolution I should choose:
    Leaving it at the original resolution or shrinking it to
    1920*1080.

    Keep in mind the bitrate is fix!

    If I choose the bigger resolution then all the pixels would get a smaller portion of bits as content information. Therefore the quality per pixel would be worse than the quality per pixel in a smaller resolution.

    So what is recommended in general:
    Encode with more pixels (=resolution) in worse quality or less pixels (=resolution) in better quality (and expanding/scaling video later at watch time)?

    Is there much difference at all?
    Quote Quote  
  2. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    2560x1440 blu-ray?

    But why decide 2000kbps? I would use constant quality if you don't need an exact output file size.
    Quote Quote  
  3. So forget the "BlueRay" and take some video source.
    Furthermore it is not the question if it is 2000 CBR or 2000 VBR or 2076 kbits whatever.
    Thse are only simplified assumptions.

    The core question is still unanswered.
    Quote Quote  
  4. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    I would go with less pixels in better quality (less encoding artifacts like blocks).
    Last edited by Baldrick; 18th Mar 2015 at 03:25.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by pxstein View Post
    Is there much difference at all?
    If you go down to 2mb/s practically nothing will be left of your high definition source irrespective of how you transcode or how much you lower the resolution.

    How anyone can find satisfaction in degrading high definition videos to that extent is totally beyond me.

    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads