VideoHelp Forum

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Consider supporting us by disable your adblocker or try DVDFab and copy, convert or make Blu-rays and DVDs! :)
+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8
FirstFirst ... 6 7 8
Results 211 to 222 of 222
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Deutschland
    Search Comp PM
    Hi @all,

    although a longtime reader I just registered a few minutes ago after stumbling over this thread because I'm having a problem with Film 9. Earlier this day I read about this software at work and because I was looking for some specialised tools for restauration of some Super 8 movies that can do what Vegas Pro and DaVinci Resolve can't do and Film 9 seemed to be "the" solution. So I installed Film 9 on my laptop at work, which is an older Intel Core i5 2500, running Windows 7 Pro, and everything went fine. Now I'm at home and just installed Film 9 on this machine, which is running Windows 10 Pro on an Intel Core i5 6500 with 16 GB Ram. After installing all the necessary tools that were needed for Film 9 I tried to fire up the program, but without success. I can see the loading screen and the programm window for about 2 seconds, but then it's closing very quickly I looked in the eventviewer to see if I can find something related to this appcrash, burt all I could find was the error message, that a lot of Windows users seem to have after the update to v1809. You can read s.th. about this here: https://www.tenforums.com/general-support/118976-new-1809-update-now-shows-event-viewer.html

    Microsoft removed a service in the 1809 update which was called "tiledatamodelsvc" (Read more about it in posting #4 in the given link above.) but some entries in the registry had not been removed and this might cause the error message in the eventviewer. Windows is running absolutely fine though and I wasn't even aware that a problem might exist.
    Maybe it has s.th. to do with the appcrash. Time and date stamp of the error messages in the eventviewer are exactly the same with when I tried to start the program....

    I have to say that this is a clean machine which is mainly used for music production (Cubase 10, Wavelab 9.5) and some Videoediting using Vegas Pro 15, Davinci Resolve 15 and VirtualDub .
    Any ideas what might cause Film 9 to crash?


    Sorry for bad english...no native speaker ^^
    Last edited by sholee; 6th Dec 2018 at 18:28. Reason: Be kind to my mistakes...
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    IGNORE this post. My project codec changed from Lagarith to X.264, which affected some of my videos. Everything works fine now.
    "I have a problem playing some processed Film9 files in Windows Media Player. One file will play fine while another file shows random corruption while playing. VirtualDub plays the files with no problem. Any idea why? (I'm running a Windows 7, 64-bit system with Film9 version 2.13)

    I was hoping to distribute the Lagarith-based AVI files to family members to play in Windows Media Player without compressing the files to another format. The original source files had been compressed badly by someone else before I got them. I am trying not to degrade the images any more than they are already.

    During processing, there is a Video tab at the top of the processing window. What is this tab showing? There are occasional, random red lines that show up in the middle of the blue lines. What do the red lines indicate?"
    Thanks to everyone who has helped create this simplified interface to AviSynth and VirtualDub!

    Steve
    Last edited by stevevid; 7th Dec 2018 at 12:59. Reason: Problem solved
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    I have several films that were captured poorly by someone else that I am trying to improve. I have some basic questions about the before and after video format changes.

    The original files are interlaced in a weird sort of way (odd 3/2 pulldown). I set Film9 to Video Tape capture since the source is interlaced, retain the source clip dimensions, and use Lagarith encoding. I am not sure what format the resulting Film9 file is in. I assume progressive since the frame rate doubled -- true? Also, why did the Chroma Subsampling change from 4:1:1 to 4:2:0 and the aspect ratio change from 4:3 to 3:2? The before and after file information are included below.

    Original file information:
    Format : AVI
    Format/Info : Audio Video Interleave
    Commercial name : DVCPRO
    File size : 174 MiB
    Duration : 48 s 81 ms
    Overall bit rate mode : Constant
    Overall bit rate : 30.3 Mb/s
    Recorded date : 2018-07-08T17:19:21-05:00
    Writing library : VirtualDub build 32842/release

    Video
    ID : 0
    Format : DV
    Commercial name : DVCPRO
    Codec ID : dvsd
    Codec ID/Hint : Sony
    Duration : 48 s 81 ms
    Bit rate mode : Constant
    Bit rate : 24.4 Mb/s
    Encoded bit rate : 28.8 Mb/s
    Width : 720 pixels
    Height : 480 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 4:3
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPS
    Original frame rate : 29.970 (29970/1000) FPS
    Standard : NTSC
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:1:1
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Bottom Field First
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 2.357
    Stream size : 165 MiB (95%)
    Film9 file information:
    Format : AVI
    Format/Info : Audio Video Interleave
    File size : 407 MiB
    Duration : 48 s 81 ms
    Overall bit rate : 71.1 Mb/s
    Writing library : VirtualDub2 build 43073/release

    Video
    ID : 0
    Format : Lagarith
    Codec ID : LAGS
    Duration : 48 s 81 ms
    Bit rate : 71.1 Mb/s
    Width : 720 pixels
    Height : 480 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 3:2
    Frame rate : 59.940 (60000/1001) FPS
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 3.431
    Stream size : 407 MiB (100%)
    Thank you,
    Steve
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by stevevid View Post
    The original files are interlaced in a weird sort of way (odd 3/2 pulldown).
    You should post a short sample. However, it's not unusual for the 3/2 pattern to vary.
    I set Film9 to Video Tape capture since the source is interlaced
    If it's telecined it's not from a video but a film source originally.
    I assume progressive since the frame rate doubled -- true?
    Yes, bobbing a video makes it progressive.
    Also, why did the Chroma Subsampling change from 4:1:1 to 4:2:0
    Not sure, but mine are like that as well. I think it happens because they get converted to YV12, a subset of YUV.
    ...the aspect ratio change from 4:3 to 3:2?
    720/480=3/2. A Lagarith AVI doesn't carry the original aspect ratio information. You'll set that for the final encode. Since the Lagarith AVI is only an intermediate step, it doesn't really matter.
    Last edited by manono; 7th Dec 2018 at 14:20.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    Manono, thanks for the response.

    I have a question about "If it's telecined it's not from a video but a film source originally." I know film is inherently progressive, but I thought that once it is converted into an interlaced format that it is essentially like a video tape capture (ignoring telecine). This would mean that I should set Film9 to Video Tape capture type because of the interlaced format. Is this true?

    Once I finish my film capture system, my videos will be purely progressive since I will do a frame by frame capture.

    Thanks,
    Steve
    Quote Quote  
  6. I don't know anything about Film9 settings, but I do know a lot about telecine. While it may appear at first to be the same thing as interlaced video, it is most definitely NOT the same thing because there is no temporal difference between fields, but instead you merely have repeats. IVTC simply removes the duplicate fields and you are left with the original progressive film frames. Neglecting the re-encoding, you end up with something that has no degradation compared to the original. By contrast, any deinterlacing, even with an excellent deinterlacer like QTGMC, will always degrade the video which is why I always recommend not deinterlacing unless it is required by the workflow (e.g., if you resize, you must first deinterlace).

    I know a little about some of these commercial film transfer systems (I own a MovieStuff Workprinter for 8/Super 8 and built my own 16mm transfer system) and they do often have the ability to add telecine so that you could play the result directly on an old-fashioned (non HD) TV. In this day and age, when any TV can natively play any film speed, you would be crazy to ever enable the telecine feature. Just capture and save the result in progressive format and time the playback to 24 fps (sound film); 18 fps (Super 8); 16 fps (most 16mm silent film); or any other speed that seems to work (for older film, especially film from the 1910-1930 period, which was often hand-cranked).
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    France
    Search PM
    Hello stevevid,

    The output format of FILM9 is ALWAYS in Progressive, whatever the standard of the Clip Source.
    You have the choice between NTSC or PAL with the frequencies of these 2 Standards.
    The final dimension ratio corresponds to the Width/Height ratio (720/480 = 1.5 ie 3/2).
    Depending on the Codec chosen, the color space may vary. With Lagarith, it's 4:2:0. With AppleProRes, it's 4:2:2.
    Best Regards
    Gilles
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    How do the different Capture Type settings for the project affect the processing? This would be the difference between the Without Synchro, With Synchro, and Video Tape settings.

    Thank you,
    Steve
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    France
    Search PM
    Everything is indicated in the documentation (Page 16) and the help-icons available on the interface.
    Also in the FAQs.

    These 3 capture modes are simply differentiated to take into account, and in particular, the number of images of the Clip Source.
    In Without-Synchro, unnecessary images are deleted, which is not the case with With-Synchro and Video Tape.
    The treatment is then almost identical.

    Regards
    Gilles
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    Thank you. I knew what the manual said. I was just wondering how the internal processing changed based on the type of input. The feedback of "In Without-Synchro, unnecessary images are deleted, which is not the case with With-Synchro and Video Tape" helps a lot. Thank you. It helps me understand what is going on inside.

    Any thoughts on the different processing approaches between With Synchro and Video Tape? I ask because I'm not sure what to use with film that has been digitized by someone else where they have created a telecined format. It will be easy when I digitize my own film because all of the video will be captured frame by frame and stored as a progressive video.

    Steve
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    France
    Search PM
    There is very little difference between With-Synchro or Video Tape.
    With With-Synchro, you can reconstruct a different FrameRate output (Interpolation).
    It is especially useful for film captures (16, 8, Super-8 mm).

    Video Tape will take the FrameRate Source and keep it in the Finale (No Interpolation).
    This mode is useful for VHS, Hi8, DV, etc ... There is no problem for audio-video synchro.
    This mode is simpler.

    Gilles
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Search PM
    Thank you very much!

    Steve
    Quote Quote