VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19
Thread
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    England
    Search PM
    Hi,

    I am capturing some old VHS tape and have noticed a strange noise / pattern on my captures.
    It resembles a vertical herring bone pattern and is worse on some colours than others. The VHS tape used is not the best but even so the noise/pattern is frustrating.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2014-11-11 at 10.00.02.png
Views:	1325
Size:	743.2 KB
ID:	28475Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2014-11-11 at 10.02.11.png
Views:	1439
Size:	792.3 KB
ID:	28476

    My hardware is as follows:-

    AJA Kona LSe.
    Panasonic SVHS deck 7350.

    Software:-

    AJA VTR-Xchange
    Final Cut Pro X
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Memphis TN, US
    Search PM
    You appear to be using a Mac. Maybe this should be moved to the Mac forum?
    If Mac is the case, I'm afraid you're limited when it come to the kind of video repair needed here. But it could also be a fault of your capture device.
    - My sister Ann's brother
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    England
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by LMotlow View Post
    You appear to be using a Mac. Maybe this should be moved to the Mac forum?
    If Mac is the case, I'm afraid you're limited when it come to the kind of video repair needed here. But it could also be a fault of your capture device.
    I'm pretty sure that it's nothing at all to do with Mac / Windows etc. The AJA Kona LSe card works on either system. I am just interested to hear from anyone who has encountered similar noise / pattern and may know what causes it or better still how to resolve it
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    I believe the "resolve it" part was the point. The software (and possibly hardware) available to a Mac user is extremely limited compared to that available to your average Windows user.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    England
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by ndjamena View Post
    I believe the "resolve it" part was the point. The software (and possibly hardware) available to a Mac user is extremely limited compared to that available to your average Windows user.
    Maybe so, but this issue is not the amount of software available for either OS, it is how to prevent the noise / pattern during capture. When I say resolve I was not meaning filtering the noise post capture via software but preventing it in the first place. I have some excellent noise reduction filters but would prefer to get a clean capture to begin with

    To me it does seem to be some kind of interference but I am no expert hence asking the question.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member hech54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Yank in Europe
    Search PM
    This conversation should be taking place in the Mac section.
    http://www.promax.com/p-721-aja-kona-lse-capture-card.aspx
    The card is designed for use on the Macintosh platform, making it an excellent choice for Final Cut Pro users.
    Also....what are you capturing as?.....uncompressed AVI?
    Does your card really have BNC connectors as inputs?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Memphis TN, US
    Search PM
    I didn't imply that using a Mac would be a cause, although the capture device might have something to do with it. The noise is a type of RF effect. Filters that clean it usually make use of convolution matrices and masking techniques.

    One filter often used to clean this particular type of RF noise, which can take many forms such as floating gray bands or moire as well as fine checkered grids, is Avisynth's DeStripe plugin script. One example of its use is here: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/333982-Bizarre-vertical-lines?p=2072013&viewfull=1#post2072013. Another example here: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1449523&postcount=9 . The script is called DeStripe.avs and originally appeared here: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1408276&postcount=31. DeStripe requires that video is de-interlaced, inverse telecined, or otherwise without field or frame blending. The colorspace must be YV12.

    Another filter that often works a little better on fine-grid hash or herringbone is VirtualDub's fsn.vfd filter ("Frequency Noise Suppressor). An example of its use is here: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/362889-Advice-on-a-VHS-transfer?p=2326764&viewfull=1#post2326764 . The fsn.vdf filter is listed among many VirtualDub noise suppressors on this web page: http://www.infognition.com/VirtualDubFilters/denoising.html. A copy of the vdf filter and brief documentation can be downloaded here: http://www.infognition.com/cgi/getfilter?id=137 . It originally appeared on a tiny and rather uninformative Russian website (the page is in Russian but can be read via Google Translate): http://acobw.narod.ru/fsn.html. The filter works only on deinterlaced video in RGB.

    A long time ago I noticed a similar filter plugin for After Effects Pro, but it was part of a package that cost well into 4 figures. Perhaps someone makes an RF noise suppressor plugin for FCP ? ?

    The problem can often be caused by faulty connectors or bad grounding somewhere in the capture circuit.
    - My sister Ann's brother
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    England
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by hech54 View Post
    This conversation should be taking place in the Mac section.
    http://www.promax.com/p-721-aja-kona-lse-capture-card.aspx
    The card is designed for use on the Macintosh platform, making it an excellent choice for Final Cut Pro users.
    Also....what are you capturing as?.....uncompressed AVI?
    Does your card really have BNC connectors as inputs?
    Capturing as DVCPRO which results in a 95GB file so it's definitely not compression artefacts.

    Yes the Kona LSe has BNC connections same as my VTR, It also has a breakout cable with :-

    3x BNC R,G,B in / out.
    3 x BNC YPbPr in / out.
    4 x XLR connectors Audio in / out.
    + Sync cable.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    England
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by LMotlow View Post
    I didn't imply that using a Mac would be a cause, although the capture device might have something to do with it. The noise is a type of RF effect. Filters that clean it usually make use of convolution matrices and masking techniques.

    One filter often used to clean this particular type of RF noise, which can take many forms such as floating gray bands or moire as well as fine checkered grids, is Avisynth's DeStripe plugin script. One example of its use is here: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/333982-Bizarre-vertical-lines?p=2072013&viewfull=1#post2072013. Another example here: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1449523&postcount=9 . The script is called DeStripe.avs and originally appeared here: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=1408276&postcount=31. DeStripe requires that video is de-interlaced, inverse telecined, or otherwise without field or frame blending. The colorspace must be YV12.

    Another filter that often works a little better on fine-grid hash or herringbone is VirtualDub's fsn.vfd filter ("Frequency Noise Suppressor). An example of its use is here: https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/362889-Advice-on-a-VHS-transfer?p=2326764&viewfull=1#post2326764 . The fsn.vdf filter is listed among many VirtualDub noise suppressors on this web page: http://www.infognition.com/VirtualDubFilters/denoising.html. A copy of the vdf filter and brief documentation can be downloaded here: http://www.infognition.com/cgi/getfilter?id=137 . It originally appeared on a tiny and rather uninformative Russian website (the page is in Russian but can be read via Google Translate): http://acobw.narod.ru/fsn.html. The filter works only on deinterlaced video in RGB.

    A long time ago I noticed a similar filter plugin for After Effects Pro, but it was part of a package that cost well into 4 figures. Perhaps someone makes an RF noise suppressor plugin for FCP ? ?

    The problem can often be caused by faulty connectors or bad grounding somewhere in the capture circuit.
    Thanks for the info, the noise is frustrating I have both tried both re-vision denoise and NeatVideo both of which do a pretty damn good job at removing the noise but I'm determined to prevent it at source. Will probably end up being a dodgy cable or something equally as silly
    Quote Quote  
  10. It might be a lack of comb filtering when separating composite into luma and chroma. Without a comb filter you will get herringbone noise anywhere there's color. The more saturated the color the more herringbone noise. Or it could be some other source of high frequency noise somewhere in the chain.

    A short non-reencoded sample would make analysis easier.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member Skiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Search PM
    The noise pattern is not on the tape because it is too high of a frequency for VHS to store it like that. It looks like a grounding issue between VCR and capture device to me. You didn't mention anything about S-Video inputs on your capture device, just YPbPr and RGB. I just looked it up – the Panasonic 7350 has S-Video out and Composite out (via BNC). Which are you using and how?
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    It's not a true "fix" of the problem directly, but a multiple capture+merge would greatly alleviate the problem, as it is extremely unlikely that the noise pattern is regular and in the same spot(s).

    Lot of effort, though.

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  13. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    This is also not a true fix but an inverted high pass of 0.4 pixels should remove the pattern.
    Image Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	high passed.png
Views:	824
Size:	625.0 KB
ID:	28480  

    Last edited by newpball; 11th Nov 2014 at 13:07.
    Quote Quote  
  14. The noise pattern is not on the tape because it is too high of a frequency for VHS to store it like that. It looks like a grounding issue between VCR and capture device to me
    I have seen these "interference's" captured on tape ( the source of the problem can be also unaligned antenna or interference's in the cable if you used cable TV, analog of course in the time of the recording it to the tape ) and there some filters and scripts that can help, median is not one of them for this kind of problems.
    Maybe Defreq (avysinth) http://avisynth.org.ru/defreq/defreq.html can be more suitible for this kind of problem
    Quote Quote  
  15. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    Depends. If the noise is already captured/recorded on tape, Median/TimeAveraging won't work. If it's a playback-only error, it could work. Both are possible.

    Looking at what Defreq does from a visual standpoint, doesn't seem like it would be that helpful, but I haven't scoured the algorithm either.

    @newpball, an "inverted HP filter" = a LP filter = blurring. It can work, but would "throw the baby out with the bathwater".

    Scott
    Quote Quote  
  16. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Cornucopia View Post
    @newpball, an "inverted HP filter" = a LP filter = blurring. It can work, but would "throw the baby out with the bathwater".
    Scott
    Frequency separation is a standard method to remove high frequency noise.

    I suppose you think the results I posted are not very good, so if you think my method is so bad why don't you put an image of your superior method next to the image I posted? Or even better if the poster can provide a 10 second video we can put both our results here.

    Last edited by newpball; 14th Nov 2014 at 00:13.
    Quote Quote  
  17. Member Cornucopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Deep in the Heart of Texas
    Search PM
    You do understand how time averaging works, right? It needs 3, 5, 9, etc. separate captures/passes of TBC'd identical-length frames in order to provide the variety needed for the Median to work. Yes, I'm confident that my suggestion would work better than yours given what you showed (it would retain noise-free smoothness without exhibiting the blurring, plus is ~noise-type agnostic), but I no longer have the equipment to do those kinds of transfers (long since transferred all my VHS -> digital and don't do this as a service anymore, even though I did it for over a decade at my last production company).

    So, no, I don't have any material to show you. Perhaps others do, such as Lordsmurf or Orsetto. However, time averaging is quite labor-intensive and so is not meant (or necessary) for your everyday job. Clearly, the Median method cannot make use of a single clip from a single pass. That's why I wrote the "lot of effort" bit.

    What I can show you (and others) is that you are throwing out more than just noise with your suggested filter/setting. Here is the (normalized) difference between the original and your filtered version. The normalization (aka expansion of contrast) exaggerates the differences, so those differences aren't as obvious when used normally. However, it makes clear the fact that WHAT your filter is filtering goes well beyond the noise, to the point where you can recognize the train + windows + clouds that have had elements removed. One of the prime tenets of restoration/enhancement/noise-reduction is to err on the conservative side of processing.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Difference.png
Views:	1009
Size:	532.2 KB
ID:	28516

    Scott

    <edit>I do have a link to something similarly done in a research paper (with pix): https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00510866/document</edit>
    Last edited by Cornucopia; 14th Nov 2014 at 01:18.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern California
    Search PM
    This is the actual difference:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	difference.png
Views:	653
Size:	483.0 KB
ID:	28517

    That, I think is already pretty good for a simple operation.

    Yes you can go show the normalized difference, but what for? To demonstrate how lousy my suggestion is?

    Again if you know better, show it (and don't worry after you show it I will normalize it as well)

    Last edited by newpball; 14th Nov 2014 at 01:37.
    Quote Quote  
  19. Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Memphis TN, US
    Search PM
    Both methods are valid, one way or the other, more or less. Would be more interesting and effective if we had some real video to work with instead of chopped up, resized stills. Can't do a damn thing with stills.

    Combination of resize and/or Virtualdub's frequency noise suppressor. Some real, unprocessed video please? Then we can debate to our heart's content. I resized/added borders to have 8x8 blocks and mod-8 to work with. Were these cropped in YUV using odd pixel numbers?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	try4.jpg
Views:	800
Size:	111.0 KB
ID:	28524
    Click image for larger version

Name:	try3.jpg
Views:	677
Size:	84.5 KB
ID:	28525
    Last edited by LMotlow; 14th Nov 2014 at 08:26.
    - My sister Ann's brother
    Quote Quote  
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!